PMC







Warning:
The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function.
more...










My NCBISign in to NCBISign Out









<!---->











Logo of micrenvLink to Publisher's site














Microbes Environ. 2012 Sep; 27(3): 257–262.


Published online 2012 Mar 23. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11309




PMCID: PMC4036051

PMID: 22446306



Inoculation of Bacillus sphaericus UPMB-10 to Young Oil Palm and Measurement of Its Uptake of Fixed Nitrogen Using the 15N Isotope Dilution Technique




Fitri Abdul Aziz Zakry,1,2Zulkifli H. Shamsuddin,1,*Khairuddin Abdul Rahim,3Zin Zawawi Zakaria,4 and Anuar Abdul Rahim1



Fitri Abdul Aziz Zakry


1Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia


2Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Campus, Malaysia


Find articles by Fitri Abdul Aziz Zakry



Zulkifli H. Shamsuddin


1Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia


Find articles by Zulkifli H. Shamsuddin



Khairuddin Abdul Rahim


3Agrotechnology and Biosciences Division, Malaysian Nuclear Agency, Malaysia


Find articles by Khairuddin Abdul Rahim



Zin Zawawi Zakaria


4Biology Division, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Malaysia


Find articles by Zin Zawawi Zakaria



Anuar Abdul Rahim


1Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia


Find articles by Anuar Abdul Rahim






Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer



1Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia


2Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Campus, Malaysia


3Agrotechnology and Biosciences Division, Malaysian Nuclear Agency, Malaysia


4Biology Division, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Malaysia


*Corresponding author. E-mail: ym.ude.mpu.irga@mahsluz; Tel: +603–8947–4964; Fax: +603–8947–4919.


Received 2011 Sep 21; Accepted 2012 Jan 15.



This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.







Abstract


There are increasing applications of diazotrophic rhizobacteria in the sustainable agriculture system. A field experiment on young immature oil palm was conducted to quantify the uptake of N derived from N2 fixation by the diazotroph Bacillus sphaericus strain UPMB-10, using the 15N isotope dilution method. Eight months after 15N application, young immature oil palms that received 67% of standard N fertilizer application together with B. sphaericus inoculation had significantly lower 15N enrichment than uninoculated palms that received similar N fertilizers. The dilution of labeled N served as a marker for the occurrence of biological N2 fixation. The proportion of N uptake that was derived from the atmosphere was estimated as 63% on the whole plant basis. The inoculation process increased the N and dry matter yields of the palm leaflets and rachis significantly. Field planting of young, immature oil palm in soil inoculated with B. sphaericus UPMB-10 might mitigate inorganic fertilizer-N application through supplementation by biological nitrogen fixation. This could be a new and important source of nitrogen biofertilizer in the early phase of oil palm cultivation in the field.



Keywords: biological nitrogen fixation, Elaeis guineensis Jacq., inoculation, 15N isotope dilution, PGPR



Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) thrives well in Malaysia and many other countries in Southeast Asia and Africa. With Malaysia presently ranked second in the world after Indonesia as a producer of palm oil, the commodity is a major contributor to the country’s economic development. Oil palm in Malaysia occupied a planted area of 4.69 million hectares in 2009, or about two-thirds of the total land area under agriculture (http://econ.mpob.gov.my/economy/Overview_2009.pdf). The crop is commonly cultivated in tropical soils, which are normally deficient in nitrogen. Young oil palms are badly affected by the insufficiency of nitrogen, which causes yellowing of the leaves, and eventually necrosis (9). The excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizer for oil palm planting, however, could pose a hazard to the agro-environment. Such practice would also increase oil palm management costs, making the industry less profitable and hence less attractive. Diazotrophic plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) may hold the key to the availability of nitrogen fertilizers that are cost-effective while being environmentally friendly. Biological N2 fixation (BNF) is recognized as an important component of the nitrogen cycle in a range of ecosystems, including several extreme environments (6, 8, 13, 24). Several PGPRs, including strains of Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Bacillus and Herbaspirillum, have been reported to exert a beneficial effect upon the plant growth of many crops, such as cotton (22), maize (3), sugarcane (27), rice (19) and oil palm (1).


Several methods are used to assess the ability of PGPRs to fix atmospheric nitrogen. In this regard, the techniques based on 15N isotope dilution are versatile and can be adapted to various experimental situations (15, 23). Using the 15N isotope dilution approach, N2 fixation by diazotrophic bacteria has been shown to contribute up to 20–50% of the total oil palm seedling N requirements under glasshouse conditions (2). Inoculation of these bacteria into the rhizosphere also improves nutrient accumulation of oil palm seedlings under field nursery conditions (1). Using the 15N natural abundance technique, de Carvalho and co-workers showed the high potential for N2 fixation to benefit some oil palms in the nursery where nitrogen derived from atmosphere (NDFA) could reach 50% of the plant’s requirement (14). Bacillus sphaericus UPMB-10, a rhizobacterium isolated from oil palm roots in Malaysia, has been shown to be a potential biofertilizer-providing microorganism with the ability to contribute 28% of the plant’s total nitrogen requirement through atmospheric nitrogen fixation (2).


As an extension of the earlier findings by Amir et al.(1, 2), this is the first study on oil palm that reports the extent of uptake of N derived from N2 fixation by the PGPR, Bacillus sphaericus UPMB-10, under field conditions, using the 15N isotope dilution method.




Materials and Methods


The experiment was conducted in a field at Tangkah Estate, Sime Darby Plantation Berhad (formerly Golden Hope Plantation Berhad), Tangkak, Johor, in southern Peninsular Malaysia (2°21′ N, 102°40′ E). Some chemical properties of the 0–15 cm layer of the Bungor soil (Ultisol) in the experimental area are presented in Table 1. Fourteen-month-old GH500 cloned oil palms were allowed to establish for 5 months after transplantation in the field in a triangular planting pattern of 8 m by 8 m (Fig. 1). The upkeep and maintenance of the trial plots included a normal estate manuring schedule of inorganic straight fertilizers, comprising N as ammonium sulfate, P as Christmas Island Rock Phosphate, K as muriate of potash, Mg as kieserite and B as borate (17). Straight fertilizer is a fertilizer that contributes a single nutrient to the crops.






Fig. 1

A plot with 16 recording oil palms (including 2 randomly selected palms receiving 15N-labeled fertilizer) and two outermost rows serving as a buffer. The buffer oil palms help to prevent cross-contamination between plots. They were treated the same as the recording palms in the 15N isotopic microplot. Recording palms were also used to conduct vegetative growth measurements (data not presented in the present study).





Table 1


Chemical properties of the soil2 (Ultisol) from the oil palm experimental field in Tangkak, Johor
















pH (KCl) (1:2.5)mg kg−1


Total NAvailable


P1KCaMg
4.716.022.319.055.015.0




1Extracted with an aqueous solution of 0.05 M HCl and 0.0125 M H2SO4


2Bungor sandy clay loam soil, with 1.2% total C content



Bacillus sphaericus UPMB-10, isolated in Malaysia from oil palm roots (2), was subcultured on tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Merck KGaA Germany) to produce a pure mother culture for inoculum production. The carrier-based inoculum of UPMB-10 strain was prepared by transferring 1.0 mL of a 24-h culture (≥1×109 cfu mL−1) to 100 mL tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Merck KGaA) contained in 500 mL flasks. The flasks were incubated on an orbital shaker at 28±2°C for 24 hours and the number of viable cells in the culture was determined by the spread-plate method on TSA after 24-h incubation. An aliquot (30 mL) of broth culture was withdrawn from the flask when the cell concentration reached 109 cfu mL−1 and was injected through a puncture into a double layered gamma-irradiated (50 kGy) polyethylene bag containing a mixture of (a) ground oil palm frond with the following compositions: 492 mg kg−1 total N, 54 mg kg−1 available P, 30 mg kg−1 available K, 4 mg kg−1 available Ca and 1 mg kg−1 available Mg, and (b) a commercial peat-based organic fertilizer with the following compositions: 253 mg kg−1 total N, 389 mg kg−1 available P, 172 mg kg−1 available K, 536 mg kg−1 available Ca and 126 mg kg−1 available Mg. The polyethylene bag contained 1,500 g of (a) and 500 g of (b) in a homogenous mixture. The inoculated bags were incubated at room temperature (28±2°C) for 2 weeks before use. The cultures were then checked for quality by the spread-plate method. The minimum population of strain UPMB-10 was ≥109 cfu g−1 during field inoculation.


In the field, the plants were laid down in randomized complete block design with 4 treatments and 4 replicates, as shown in Table 2. The (Uninoculated−Ni+15Ni) and (Uninoculated+100% Ni+15Ni) treatments served as negative and positive controls, respectively, and also as a benchmark for deficient N (negative control) and optimum N (positive control). The (Inoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) treatment involved inoculation with B. sphaericus strain UPMB-10 inoculum. The (Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) control treatment had similar Ni (67%) to the inoculated treatment. All uninoculated treatments were provided with killed inoculum (gamma-irradiated at 50 kGy) per palm. ‘100% Ni’ and ‘67% Ni’ refer to the full recommended inorganic N fertilizer regime (17) and 67% of the full N fertilizer regime, respectively.



Table 2


Treatment design and description of biological nitrogen fixation by inoculated PGPR Bacillus sphaericus UPMB-10 in association with the growth of immature oil palm












TreatmentsDescriptions
Uninoculated-Ni+15NiNo inorganic-N fertilization, with no inoculation, supplemented with 10.13 atom %15N excess of inorganic-N-labeled fertilizer.
Uninoculated+67% Ni+15NiInorganic normal N fertilizer (unlabeled ammonium sulfate) applied at 67% standard estate rate, with no inoculation, supplemented with 10.13 atom %15N excess of inorganic-N-labeled fertilizer.
Inoculated+67% Ni+15NiInorganic normal N fertilizer (unlabeled ammonium sulfate) applied at 67% standard estate rate, with B. sphaericus strain UPMB-10 inoculation, supplemented with 10.13 atom %15N excess of inorganic-N-labeled fertilizer.
Uninoculated+100% Ni+15NiInorganic normal N fertilizer (unlabeled ammonium sulfate) applied at full (100%) standard estate rate, with no inoculation, supplemented with 10.13 atom %15N excess of inorganic-N-labeled fertilizer.


Note: All treatments were labeled with 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate (10.13 atom %15N enrichment as a tracer) according to 1 g N m−2.



Recordings were made from 16 palms for each of the 16 plots (4 treatments by 4 replicates). Palms in the two outermost rows served as a buffer (Fig. 1). The 15N-labeled fertilizer used was (15NH4)2SO4 (ammonium sulfate) with 10.13 atom % 15N excess (at.%15Ne) serving as a tracer. The field experiment was initiated by the application of 15N-labeled fertilizer 5 months after transplanting. Within the 16 recording palms, 2 palms (micro-plot) received labeled 15N, with 10.13 at.%15Ne ammonium sulfate at a rate of 1 g N m−2 (Fig. 1). The 15N-labeled fertilizer was uniformly applied in liquid form using 2 L distilled water per isotopic plot of 1 m2 size. The plots were then covered with black polythene sheets evenly to reduce 15N-labeled fertilizer loss. A week later, the black polythene sheets at the 15N isotopic microplots were removed after the inner surface of each sheet was rinsed with water prior to inoculum application (31). The black polythene sheets were used once only for all inoculated and uninoculated 15N isotopic microplots. Inoculum for the first inoculation was then applied followed by the second inoculation four months later. The (Inoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) treatment was carried out at a rate of 2 kg inoculum (containing more than 109 cfu g−1B. sphaericus UPMB-10) by raking the surface of soil to a depth of approximately 5 cm within an area of 1 m2, and at a rate equivalent to 296 kg ha−1.


Harvesting was carried out 240 days (8 months) after the 15N-labeled fertilizer application. Four palms from each treatment were harvested destructively, and separated into leaflets, rachis, stem and roots. The major roots were extracted with a backhoe tractor, and the remaining roots were excavated by shoveling and sieving the soil within the area occupied by the harvested palm. Fresh weights and weights of oven-dried (70°C for 72 h) sub-samples were recorded. Samples were ground to pass through 0.5 mm sieves and analyzed for total N by the semi-micro Kjeldahl method (5) and atom %15N excess using the NOI-6PC emission spectrometer at Malaysian Nuclear Agency, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. The 15N abundance found in palm tissue was corrected for the atom %15N excess present in the atmosphere (0.3663 at.%15Ne) (30).


N2 fixation in the whole palm was calculated from weighted atom excess (WAE) in the inoculated palm (Inoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) and uninoculated palm (Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni), using the following formula (15):


WAE=AE(Lf)×TN(Lf)+AE(Rc)×TN(Rc)+AE(St)×TN(St)+AE(Rt)×TN(Rt)TN (Lf+Rc+St+Rt)×100

where AE, TN, Lf, Rc, St and Rt are atom % 15N excess, total N, leaflets, rachis, stems and roots, respectively.


The % of N derived from atmospheric N (%Ndfa) was then calculated as follows:


%Ndfa=1-WAE in inoculated oil palmWAE in uninoculated oil palm×100

The data were statistically analyzed using a linear contrast one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test (SPSS Statistics version 17.0). The data were tested for significance of differences between the experimental treatments.




Results



Dry matter yield


The inoculated palms (Inoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) accumulated the highest total dry matter at 10.5 kg palm−1 followed by uninoculated palms fertilized with the full rate of N (Uninoculated+100% Ni+15Ni) at 8.4 kg palm−1, and uninoculated palms fertilized with 67% inorganic-N (Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) at 8.3 kg palm−1 (Table 3). Among the plant parts, the dry weight of the rachis and leaflets increased significantly (p<0.05) after inoculation with B. sphaericus UPMB-10, as compared with uninoculated palms supplied with 67% inorganic N fertilizer. Rachis accounted for the highest proportion of dry matter, making up nearly 40% of the total weight. This was followed by leaflets (27%), stems (16%) and roots (14%). It was evident from this that over the 240 days of the trial, the growth of the young immature oil palms in field occurred predominantly aboveground, especially in the rachis and leaflets.



Table 3


Dry matter yield (% of total dry matter) and its distribution in plant parts of field-grown immature oil palm






































TreatmentsDry matter yield (kg palm−1) Mean±SEMTotal dry matter yield (kg palm−1)Total dry matter yield (kg ha−1)b


LeafletsRachisStemsRoots
Uninoculated-Ni+15Ni1.8±0.2 (27.8)a2.6±0.3 (40.2)1.1±0.1 (16.4)1.0±0.2 (15.6)6.5968
Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni2.0±0.2 (24.3)3.6±0.4 (43.3)1.3±0.2 (15.9)1.4±0.1 (16.5)8.31,228
Inoculated+67% Ni+15Ni2.8±0.5* (26.4)4.7±0.7* (44.9)1.7±0.3 (15.7)1.4±0.1 (13.0)10.51,557
Uninoculated+100% Ni+15Ni2.2±0.2 (26.5)3.7±0.3 (44.4)1.3±0.1 (15.7)1.1±0.2 (13.4)8.41,245




avalues in parentheses represent % of total dry matter.


b1 ha=148 palms


*p<0.05 versus control (Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) (One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-hoc test)





Total nitrogen yield


The amount of N present in young immature oil palm on average was 95 g palm−1 (Table 4), with the distributions among plant parts being 60% in leaflets, 15% in rachis, 16% in stem and 9% in roots. On average, the palms inoculated with B. sphaericus UPMB-10 (Inoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) accumulated more N at 125 g palm−1 than uninoculated palms (Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) at 90 g palm−1, although this difference was not statistically significant. Among the palm parts, leaflets and rachis accumulated significantly higher amounts of N (p<0.05) at 75 g palm−1 and 19 g palm−1 respectively, than uninoculated palms, where N contents were 53 g palm−1 and 12 g palm−1, respectively.



Table 4


Total N yield (% of total N) and its distribution in immature oil palm

































TreatmentsN yield (g palm−1) Mean±SEMTotal N yield


LeafletsRachisStemRoots
Uninoculated − Ni + 15Ni40.4±5.7 (66.3)a8.3±1.1 (13.7)7.0±0.6 (11.5)5.8±1.2 (8.5)61.0
Uninoculated + 67% Ni + 15Ni53.4±5.9 (59.3)12.1±1.4 (13.4)15.4±2.1 (17.1)9.1±1.0 (10.2)90.0
Inoculated + 67% Ni + 15Ni75.0±12.6* (60.2)18.9±4.5* (15.2)20.6±3.9 (16.6)10.0±0.8 (8.0)124.5
Uninoculated + 100% Ni + 15Ni57.0±5.3 (54.8)19.9±3.3* (19.1)18.9±1.7 (18.2)8.2±1.7 (7.9)104.0




avalues in parentheses represent % of total N in palm


*p<0.05 versus control (Uninoculated+67%Ni+15Ni) (One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-hoc test)





Uptake of labeled nitrogen


The weighted %15N atom excess for the reference palms (Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) was 0.065 at.%15Ne. This was significantly higher (p<0.05) than 0.023 at.%15Ne obtained for the inoculated palms (Inoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) after 240 days in the field. Among plant parts, leaflets of inoculated palms showed significantly lower 15N enrichment at 0.021 at.%15Ne than uninoculated palms, which gave an average reading of 0.091 at.%15Ne. Rachis, stems and roots on average also had lower but insignificant 15N enrichment at 0.030, 0.017 and 0.031 at.%15Ne respectively, than at 0.034, 0.019 and 0.034 at.%15Ne, respectively for uninoculated oil palms (Table 5).



Table 5


Distribution of %15N atom excess in different plant parts and the mean weighted atom excess (WAE) for the whole plant

































Treatments% 15N atom excess (Mean±SEM)WAE (whole palm)


LeafletsRachisStemsRoots
Uninoculated-Ni+15Ni0.048±0.00280.061±0.00450.041±0.00460.069±0.00670.051±0.0033
Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni0.091±0.01590.034±0.00190.019±0.00170.034±0.00430.065±0.0089
Inoculated+67% Ni+15Ni0.021*±0.00030.030±0.00320.017±0.00210.031±0.00190.023*±0.0009
Uninoculated+100% Ni+15Ni0.015*±0.00060.024±0.00310.030±0.00470.037±0.00390.021*±0.0011




*p<0.05 versus control (Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) (One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-hoc test).

Note: (Uninoculate-Ni+15Ni) and (Uninoculated+100% Ni+15Ni) are negative (no nitrogen fertilizer application) and positive controls (full nitrogen fertilizer application at estate recommended rate), respectively. All treatments were labeled with 15Ni as a tracer to quantify biological nitrogen fixation using indirect 15N isotope dilution technique.






Nitrogen fixation


On the basis of the whole palm, inoculation with UPMB-10 strain had 63.4%Ndfa (78.1 g N fixed palm−1), which is equivalent to 17.4 kg N ha−1 year−1, at a planting density of 148 palms ha−1 (Table 6). The mean %Ndfa in different plant parts was 74.7, 12.7, 13.2 and 13.4 for leaflets, rachis, stems and roots, respectively (based on the weighted atom % 15N excess values). Among the plant parts, the %Ndfa in inoculated palm leaflets accumulated the highest fixed N (74.7%Ndfa or 55.4 g palm−1, equivalent to 12.3 kg N ha−1 year−1, at a planting density of 148 palms ha−1).



Table 6


Estimates of proportions (%Ndfa) and amounts, g N palm−1* of N fixed in the whole plant and in the different plant parts of field grown immature oil palm, with Bacillus sphaericus UPMB-10 inoculation

















%Ndfa (amount of N2 fixed, g palm−1) Mean±SEM


Whole palmLeafletsRachisStemsRoots
63.4±4.574.7±3.612.7±7.913.2±6.913.4±8.4
(78.1±11.6)(55.4±8.3)(3.0±1.9)(2.5±1.0)(1.5±1.0)



*In parentheses





Discussion


Many researchers consider 15N isotope dilution to be the most accurate technique to quantify biological N2 fixation by plants under greenhouse and nursery conditions, and even in the field (2, 11, 12, 20, 25). In our study, the atom % 15N excess in the whole young oil palm inoculated with B. sphaericus UPMB-10 (Inoculated+67% Ni+15Ni) was significantly lower than in uninoculated palms (Uninoculated+67% Ni+15Ni), thus indicating that substantial N2 fixation occurred. B. sphaericus UPMB-10 inoculation resulted in the acquisition of N from the atmosphere, which contributed 63% (almost two-thirds) of the plant N uptake. This was equivalent to 78 g N fixed palm−1 in the 240 day period of growth or 11.6 kg N ha−1, based on a planting density of 148 palms ha−1. The findings in this study support the previous work of Amir et al.(2), but the 63% proportional contribution of fixed N was even higher than the 28% they had earlier reported. The higher contribution of N by B. sphaericus UPMB-10 inoculation through BNF in the present study could have resulted from the use of solid inoculum application, a strategy adopted after studying the outcomes and suggestions from the previous work of Amir et al.(1, 2). In the present study, field inoculation was conducted using solid substrate inoculum, not as in the earlier reports (1, 2), which used liquid inoculum. The solid substrate inoculum has several added benefits over liquid inoculum as it provides a substantial amount of carbon source, which was lacking in the liquid inoculum. In addition, the solid substrate inoculum was incubated for a minimum of two weeks to allow the inoculum population to reach 1×109 cfu g−1 substrate. Thus, the inoculum in the inoculated treatment in young oil palms would have a high population of B. sphaericus UPMB-10 and more supply of organic substrate to sustain growth and multiply in the soil, and subsequently offer more Ndfa (63%) through N2-fixing activity. The enhancement of N2-fixing activity could be due to a higher concentration of carbon sources; namely, starch, hemicellulose and degradation products from beneficial soil microbial interactions (28). In addition, the role of solid substrate in supplying an organic carbon source and other degradation products could also provide ‘shelter’ for bacterial cells from direct sunlight and as a buffer zone for solid substrate-soil surface interactions prior to rhizosphere colonization.


Among the plant parts, the accumulation of N in leaflets significantly increased in inoculated oil palms in parallel with the respective increases in %Ndfa values as compared with the uninoculated control palms. This could be related to the high amount of N nutrition required in the leaves for photosynthesis, especially crucial in the early growth stages of oil palm in the field (10).


In this present study, the roots contained 13% of the total N2 fixed by the whole palm and 14% of the accumulated dry matter. This relatively small proportion of the roots in relation to the whole plant was similar to the 12% reported by Carranca et al.(7) in pea roots and 8–15% reported by Samba et al.(25) for legume roots of Crotalaria species. In both of these studies, roots were omitted from their 15N evaluations. Nevertheless, due caution is advisable since ignoring the contribution from roots might result in significant underestimation of N2 fixed in some plants, as has been reported in Acacia sp., Faidherbia albida, Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena leucocephala and Pterocarpus sp. (18, 21, 26, 29). Nevertheless, this does not appear to be the case for oil palm, which is a non-nodulating and non-leguminous crop. Conversely, much of the total dry matter was accumulated aboveground.


The present study indicated that inoculation with B. sphaericus UPMB-10 significantly improved N and dry matter yields of leaflets and rachis of young immature oil palms 8 months after treatment, although this effect was not observed in the stem or roots. The leaflets and rachis together accounted for most of the N and dry weight accumulation of the plants. To secure compelling evidence of biological N2 fixation, Boddey (4) maintained that associative biological N2 fixation should include both higher N yield and lower 15N enrichment of the inoculated plant compared to the uninoculated plant. A significant dry matter or fruit yield increase due to inoculation with diazotrophic organisms should be accompanied by such evidence before it can be confidently concluded that the response is due to N2 fixation, and not to some other factors. The present study, which showed both higher N yield and lower 15N enrichment as a result of soil inoculation with B. sphaericus UPMB-10, is in agreement with the criteria suggested by Boddey (4). What was still left to be demonstrated was an increase in fruit yield. Since immature oil palms were used in the present study, the effect of inoculation on the fruit yield was outside the scope of the present study. Nevertheless, nutritional, growth and BNF measurements up to palm maturity (2.5 years after planting) and fruit-bearing stages (3 years after planting) in future studies would provide a clearer picture of the effect of B. sphaericus UPMB-10 inoculation on oil palm cultivation. In addition, the planting density, soil type and trial location would need to be carefully considered in order to reduce the soil and spatial variability factors that could compromise data accuracy (14, 16).


In conclusion, field planting of young immature oil palm in soil inoculated with Bacillus sphaericus UPMB-10 reduced N fertilizer dependence through the supplementation of N by biological nitrogen fixation. The inoculation process contributed N2 fixation from the atmosphere, which provided 63%, or nearly two-thirds of the total N uptake of the young immature oil palm. Hence, B. sphaericus UPMB-10 has the potential to be formulated for use as a biofertilizer. It is proposed that the experimental period should be extended in future studies until the flowering and fruiting stages of the oil palm to elucidate further the role of the diazotrophic rhizobacterium B. sphaericus UPMB-10 in promoting the growth and fruit yield of oil palm.




Acknowledgements


We are grateful to the Golden Hope Research Centre, Golden Hope Plantation Berhad (now Sime Darby Plantation Berhad) for arrangement of the field trial. Grateful appreciation is also extended to Tangkah Estate Management for providing and supporting the field preparation and maintenance; to the staff of Agrotechnology and Biosciences Division, Malaysian Nuclear Agency (Nuclear Malaysia), for technical assistance in 15N field application and assays, and to MINTec-SINAGAMA, Nuclear Malaysia, for gamma irradiation services. The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) (IRPA (EA): 09-02-04-0497-EA001) is acknowledged for research funding and also Universiti Putra Malaysia for overall support of the study.




References



1. Amir HG, Shamsuddin ZH, Halimi MS, Marziah M, Ramlan MF. Enhancement in nutrient accumulation and growth of oil palm seedlings caused by PGPR under field nursery conditions. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2005;36:2059–2066.

2. Amir HG, Shamsuddin ZH, Halimi MS, Ramlan MF, Marziah M. N2fixation, nutrient accumulation and plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria in association with oil palm seedlings. Pakistan J Biol Sc. 2003;6:1269–1272.

3. Balandreau J. The spermosphere model to select for plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Kennedy IR, Choudhury ATMA, editors. Biofertilisers in Action. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation; Canberra: 2002. pp. 55–63.

4. Boddey RM. Methods for quantification of nitrogen fixation associated with gramineae. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 1987;6:209–266.

5. Bremner JM. Nitrogen-Total. In: Spark DL, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Chemical Methods. American Society of Agronomy, Inc; Madison, Wisconsin: 1996. pp. 1085–1121.

6. Çakmakçi R, Dönmez F, Aydin A, Sahin F. Growth promotion of plants by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:1482–1487.

7. Carranca CA, Varennes DE, Rolston DE. Biological nitrogen fixation by fababean, pea and chickpea, under field conditions, estimated by 15N isotope dilution technique. Eur J Agron. 1999;10:49–56.

8. Chalk PM. The contribution of associative and symbiotic nitrogen fixation to the nitrogen nutrition of non-legumes. Plant Soil. 1991;132:29–39.

9. Chew PS, Pushparajah E. Nitrogen management and fertilization of tropical plantation tree crops. In: Bacon PE, editor. Nitrogen Fertilization in the Environment. Marcel Dekker; New York, USA: 1995. pp. 225–294.

10. Corley RHV, Tinker PB. The Oil Palm. 4th ed. Blackwell Science Ltd., Blackwell Publishing Company; Oxford: 2003.

11. Danso SKA, Zapata F, Awonaike KO. Measurement of biological N2fixation in field-grown Robinia pseudoacacia L. Soil Biol Biochem. 1995;27:415–419.

12. Danso SKA, Bowen GD, Sanginga N. Biological nitrogen fixation in trees in agro-ecosystems. Plant Soil. 1992;141:177–196.

13. Dart PJ. Nitrogen fixation associated with non-legumes in agriculture. Plant Soil. 1986;90:303–334.

14. de Carvalho ALV, Alves BJR, Baldani VLD, Reis VM. Application of 15N natural abundance technique for evaluating biological nitrogen fixation in oil palm ecotypes at nursery stage in pot experiments and at mature plantation sites. Plant Soil. 2008;302:71–78.

15. Fried M, Danso SKA, Zapata F. The methodology of measurement of N2fixation by non-legumes as inferred in field experiments with legumes. Can J Microbiol. 1983;29:1053–1062.

16. Gerritsma W, Soebagyo FX. An analysis of the growth of leaf area of oil palms in Indonesia. Exp Agr. 1999;35:293–308.

17. Goh KJ, Härdter R. General oil palm nutrition. In: Fairhurst TH, Härdter R, editors. Oil Palm: Management for Large and Sustainable Yields. PPI; Switzerland: 2003. pp. 191–230.

18. Gueye M, Ndoye I, Dianda M, Danso SKA, Dreyfus B. Active N2fixation in several Faidherbia albida provenances. A Soil Res Rehab. 1997;11:63–70.

19. James EK, Gyaneshwar P, Barraquio WL, Mathan N, Ladha JK. Endophytic diazotrophs associated with rice. In: Ladha JK, Reddy PM, editors. The Quest for Nitrogen Fixation in Rice. International Rice Research Institute; Los Baños: 2000. pp. 119–140.

20. Liyanage M, de S, Danso SKA, Jayasundara HPS. Biological nitrogen fixation in four Gliricidia sepium genotypes. Plant Soil. 1994;161:267–274.

21. Ndoye I, Gueye M, Danso SKA, Dreyfus B. Nitrogen fixation in Faidherbia albida, Acacia raddiana, Acacia senegal and Acacia seyal estimated using 15N isotope dilution technique. Plant Soil. 1995;172:175–180.

22. Patil PL, Patil SP. Uptake of nitrogen by cotton inoculated with Azotobacter. J Maharashtra Agricultural Universities. 1984;9:171–172.

23. Rennie RJ, Rennie DA. Techniques for quantifying N2fixation in association with non-legumes under field and green house conditions. Can J Microbiol. 1983;29:1022–1035.

24. Saad MS, Ali AS, Sabuddin, Yunus AG, Shamsuddin ZH. Effects of Azospirillum inoculation on sweet potato grown on sandy tin-tailing soil. Comm Soil Sc Plant Anal. 1999;30:1583–1592.

25. Samba RT, Sylla SN, Neyra M, Gueye M, Dreyfus B, Ndoye I. Biological nitrogen fixation in Crotalaria species estimated using the 15N isotope dilution method. African J Biotech. 2002;1:17–22.

26. Sanginga N, Zapata F, Danso SKA, Bowen GD. Estimating nitrogen fixation in Leucaena and Gliricidia using different 15N labelling methods. In: Mulongoy K, Gueye M, Spencer DC, editors. Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Sustainability of Tropical Agriculture. IITA, Wiley-Sayce and AABNF co-publication; Chichester, New York, Grisbane, Toronto and Singapore: 1992. pp. 265–275.

27. Shankariah C, Hunsigi G. In: Hogarth DM, editor. Field responses of sugarcane to associative N2fixers and P solubilis; Proceedings of the 24th International Society of Sugarcane Technologists; Brisbane. 2001. pp. 40–45.

28. Shrestha A, Toyota K, Okazaki M, Suga Y, Quevedo MA, Loreto AB, Mariscal AA. Enhancement of nitrogen-fixing activity of enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from sago palm (Metroxylon sagu) by microbial interaction with non-nitrogen fixers. Microbes Environ. 2007;22:59–70.

29. Sylla SN, Ndoye I, Gueye M, Dreyfus B, Ba AT. Assessment of nitrogen fixation in Pterocarpus erinaceus and P. lucens using 15N labelling techniques. A Soil Res Rehab. 1999;12:247–254.

30. Warembourg FR. Nitrogen fixation in soil and plant system. In: Knowles R, Blackburn TH, editors. Nitrogen Isotope Technique. Academic Press; London: 1993. pp. 127–155.

31. Zakry FAA, Anuar AR, Zin ZZ, Shamsuddin ZH, Khairuddin AR. Use of 15N isotope dilution technique in field evaluation of N2fixation in young oil palm inoculated with Bacillus sphaericus UPMB-10. In: Abdul Rahim KB, editor. FNCA Biofertilizer Newsletter. Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia; Tokyo: 2005. pp. 3–5.






Articles from Microbes and Environments are provided here courtesy of Nakanishi Printing

















Formats:


  • Article
  • |
  • PubReader
  • | |
  • PDF (320K)
  • |
  • Citation






















(function($)
$('.skiplink').each(function(i, item)
var href = $($(item).attr('href'));
href.attr('tabindex', '-1').addClass('skiptarget'); // ensure the target can receive focus
$(item).on('click', function(event)
event.preventDefault();
$.scrollTo(href, 0,
onAfter: function()
href.focus();

);
);
);
)(jQuery);





Support Center
Support Center




















statistics
<!---->




Popular posts from this blog

Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64

ReactJS Fetched API data displays live - need Data displayed static

政党