Enable Constraint - Peformance Impact










0















The below statement consumes a huge amount of time for a table containing 70 million records.



ALTER TABLE <table-name> ENABLE CONSTRAINT <constraint-name>


Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint.



Even though the constraint got enabled, the process just hung for more than 5 hours.



Any ideas on how this can be optimized










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    "Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint?" Yes.

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:28






  • 1





    As for optimising it, there probably aren't that many options. Some details would be useful. What sort of constraint is it? Why was it disabled? What happened while it was disabled?

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:29






  • 1





    Depends on how the constrains was disabled, see the documentation. But usually - YES - enabling the constraint causes scanning of all rows in order to validate the constraint.

    – krokodilko
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:29











  • @APC- it is a part of an existing stored procedure that we can enable this constraint .. It was disabled in order to update test data on some columns.. Post that it was enabled again.. But this step got hung and it took a huge amount of time

    – Tiny
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:32






  • 1





    But what sort of constraint was it? Check constraint? Primary key? Foreign key? And what is the perceived benefit of disabling the constraint before the update compared to doing the update with it enabled?

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:38















0















The below statement consumes a huge amount of time for a table containing 70 million records.



ALTER TABLE <table-name> ENABLE CONSTRAINT <constraint-name>


Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint.



Even though the constraint got enabled, the process just hung for more than 5 hours.



Any ideas on how this can be optimized










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    "Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint?" Yes.

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:28






  • 1





    As for optimising it, there probably aren't that many options. Some details would be useful. What sort of constraint is it? Why was it disabled? What happened while it was disabled?

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:29






  • 1





    Depends on how the constrains was disabled, see the documentation. But usually - YES - enabling the constraint causes scanning of all rows in order to validate the constraint.

    – krokodilko
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:29











  • @APC- it is a part of an existing stored procedure that we can enable this constraint .. It was disabled in order to update test data on some columns.. Post that it was enabled again.. But this step got hung and it took a huge amount of time

    – Tiny
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:32






  • 1





    But what sort of constraint was it? Check constraint? Primary key? Foreign key? And what is the perceived benefit of disabling the constraint before the update compared to doing the update with it enabled?

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:38













0












0








0








The below statement consumes a huge amount of time for a table containing 70 million records.



ALTER TABLE <table-name> ENABLE CONSTRAINT <constraint-name>


Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint.



Even though the constraint got enabled, the process just hung for more than 5 hours.



Any ideas on how this can be optimized










share|improve this question
















The below statement consumes a huge amount of time for a table containing 70 million records.



ALTER TABLE <table-name> ENABLE CONSTRAINT <constraint-name>


Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint.



Even though the constraint got enabled, the process just hung for more than 5 hours.



Any ideas on how this can be optimized







oracle oracle11g ddl database-administration






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 '18 at 18:28







Tiny

















asked Nov 15 '18 at 18:02









TinyTiny

360729




360729







  • 1





    "Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint?" Yes.

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:28






  • 1





    As for optimising it, there probably aren't that many options. Some details would be useful. What sort of constraint is it? Why was it disabled? What happened while it was disabled?

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:29






  • 1





    Depends on how the constrains was disabled, see the documentation. But usually - YES - enabling the constraint causes scanning of all rows in order to validate the constraint.

    – krokodilko
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:29











  • @APC- it is a part of an existing stored procedure that we can enable this constraint .. It was disabled in order to update test data on some columns.. Post that it was enabled again.. But this step got hung and it took a huge amount of time

    – Tiny
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:32






  • 1





    But what sort of constraint was it? Check constraint? Primary key? Foreign key? And what is the perceived benefit of disabling the constraint before the update compared to doing the update with it enabled?

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:38












  • 1





    "Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint?" Yes.

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:28






  • 1





    As for optimising it, there probably aren't that many options. Some details would be useful. What sort of constraint is it? Why was it disabled? What happened while it was disabled?

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:29






  • 1





    Depends on how the constrains was disabled, see the documentation. But usually - YES - enabling the constraint causes scanning of all rows in order to validate the constraint.

    – krokodilko
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:29











  • @APC- it is a part of an existing stored procedure that we can enable this constraint .. It was disabled in order to update test data on some columns.. Post that it was enabled again.. But this step got hung and it took a huge amount of time

    – Tiny
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:32






  • 1





    But what sort of constraint was it? Check constraint? Primary key? Foreign key? And what is the perceived benefit of disabling the constraint before the update compared to doing the update with it enabled?

    – APC
    Nov 15 '18 at 18:38







1




1





"Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint?" Yes.

– APC
Nov 15 '18 at 18:28





"Does table scan all rows while enabling the constraint?" Yes.

– APC
Nov 15 '18 at 18:28




1




1





As for optimising it, there probably aren't that many options. Some details would be useful. What sort of constraint is it? Why was it disabled? What happened while it was disabled?

– APC
Nov 15 '18 at 18:29





As for optimising it, there probably aren't that many options. Some details would be useful. What sort of constraint is it? Why was it disabled? What happened while it was disabled?

– APC
Nov 15 '18 at 18:29




1




1





Depends on how the constrains was disabled, see the documentation. But usually - YES - enabling the constraint causes scanning of all rows in order to validate the constraint.

– krokodilko
Nov 15 '18 at 18:29





Depends on how the constrains was disabled, see the documentation. But usually - YES - enabling the constraint causes scanning of all rows in order to validate the constraint.

– krokodilko
Nov 15 '18 at 18:29













@APC- it is a part of an existing stored procedure that we can enable this constraint .. It was disabled in order to update test data on some columns.. Post that it was enabled again.. But this step got hung and it took a huge amount of time

– Tiny
Nov 15 '18 at 18:32





@APC- it is a part of an existing stored procedure that we can enable this constraint .. It was disabled in order to update test data on some columns.. Post that it was enabled again.. But this step got hung and it took a huge amount of time

– Tiny
Nov 15 '18 at 18:32




1




1





But what sort of constraint was it? Check constraint? Primary key? Foreign key? And what is the perceived benefit of disabling the constraint before the update compared to doing the update with it enabled?

– APC
Nov 15 '18 at 18:38





But what sort of constraint was it? Check constraint? Primary key? Foreign key? And what is the perceived benefit of disabling the constraint before the update compared to doing the update with it enabled?

– APC
Nov 15 '18 at 18:38












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














As guys said before, depends on constrain type it is possibility skip validate existing data by ALTER TABLE ENABLE NOVALIDATE CONSTRAINT . And check this data by some additional procedure or query.



You can find documentation about that here https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/general005.htm#ADMIN11546






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53325428%2fenable-constraint-peformance-impact%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    As guys said before, depends on constrain type it is possibility skip validate existing data by ALTER TABLE ENABLE NOVALIDATE CONSTRAINT . And check this data by some additional procedure or query.



    You can find documentation about that here https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/general005.htm#ADMIN11546






    share|improve this answer





























      3














      As guys said before, depends on constrain type it is possibility skip validate existing data by ALTER TABLE ENABLE NOVALIDATE CONSTRAINT . And check this data by some additional procedure or query.



      You can find documentation about that here https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/general005.htm#ADMIN11546






      share|improve this answer



























        3












        3








        3







        As guys said before, depends on constrain type it is possibility skip validate existing data by ALTER TABLE ENABLE NOVALIDATE CONSTRAINT . And check this data by some additional procedure or query.



        You can find documentation about that here https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/general005.htm#ADMIN11546






        share|improve this answer















        As guys said before, depends on constrain type it is possibility skip validate existing data by ALTER TABLE ENABLE NOVALIDATE CONSTRAINT . And check this data by some additional procedure or query.



        You can find documentation about that here https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/general005.htm#ADMIN11546







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 15 '18 at 21:50









        marc_s

        581k13011211268




        581k13011211268










        answered Nov 15 '18 at 21:38









        Yevhen ZhovtonohYevhen Zhovtonoh

        1764




        1764





























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53325428%2fenable-constraint-peformance-impact%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64

            政党

            天津地下鉄3号線