How to extend the n-Queens problem to three dimensions?
I am facing a problem that "How to extend the n-Queens problem to three dimensions?" I cannot figure it out.
java n-queens
add a comment |
I am facing a problem that "How to extend the n-Queens problem to three dimensions?" I cannot figure it out.
java n-queens
add a comment |
I am facing a problem that "How to extend the n-Queens problem to three dimensions?" I cannot figure it out.
java n-queens
I am facing a problem that "How to extend the n-Queens problem to three dimensions?" I cannot figure it out.
java n-queens
java n-queens
asked Nov 14 '18 at 5:18
Judith8899Judith8899
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Answer could be very long but esentially you add one more rule to the most known problem:
height
The solution is represented by a set D, if for the Cartesian product, D×D, each element ((ik, jk), (il, jl)) either satisfies all of the following rules or fails all of them.
(1) ik ≠ il (not on same column)
(2) jk ≠ jl (not on same row)
(3) ik + jk ≠ il + jl (not on same diagonal)
(4) ik − jk ≠ il − jl (not on same diagonal)
To make it 3d you add:
(5) ih ≠ jh (not on the same vertical plane with height h)
https://medium.com/@abhijith0505/the-n-queens-in-3-d-640e20130912
Don't forget about diagonals with height.
– Mad Physicist
Nov 14 '18 at 5:26
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53293621%2fhow-to-extend-the-n-queens-problem-to-three-dimensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Answer could be very long but esentially you add one more rule to the most known problem:
height
The solution is represented by a set D, if for the Cartesian product, D×D, each element ((ik, jk), (il, jl)) either satisfies all of the following rules or fails all of them.
(1) ik ≠ il (not on same column)
(2) jk ≠ jl (not on same row)
(3) ik + jk ≠ il + jl (not on same diagonal)
(4) ik − jk ≠ il − jl (not on same diagonal)
To make it 3d you add:
(5) ih ≠ jh (not on the same vertical plane with height h)
https://medium.com/@abhijith0505/the-n-queens-in-3-d-640e20130912
Don't forget about diagonals with height.
– Mad Physicist
Nov 14 '18 at 5:26
add a comment |
Answer could be very long but esentially you add one more rule to the most known problem:
height
The solution is represented by a set D, if for the Cartesian product, D×D, each element ((ik, jk), (il, jl)) either satisfies all of the following rules or fails all of them.
(1) ik ≠ il (not on same column)
(2) jk ≠ jl (not on same row)
(3) ik + jk ≠ il + jl (not on same diagonal)
(4) ik − jk ≠ il − jl (not on same diagonal)
To make it 3d you add:
(5) ih ≠ jh (not on the same vertical plane with height h)
https://medium.com/@abhijith0505/the-n-queens-in-3-d-640e20130912
Don't forget about diagonals with height.
– Mad Physicist
Nov 14 '18 at 5:26
add a comment |
Answer could be very long but esentially you add one more rule to the most known problem:
height
The solution is represented by a set D, if for the Cartesian product, D×D, each element ((ik, jk), (il, jl)) either satisfies all of the following rules or fails all of them.
(1) ik ≠ il (not on same column)
(2) jk ≠ jl (not on same row)
(3) ik + jk ≠ il + jl (not on same diagonal)
(4) ik − jk ≠ il − jl (not on same diagonal)
To make it 3d you add:
(5) ih ≠ jh (not on the same vertical plane with height h)
https://medium.com/@abhijith0505/the-n-queens-in-3-d-640e20130912
Answer could be very long but esentially you add one more rule to the most known problem:
height
The solution is represented by a set D, if for the Cartesian product, D×D, each element ((ik, jk), (il, jl)) either satisfies all of the following rules or fails all of them.
(1) ik ≠ il (not on same column)
(2) jk ≠ jl (not on same row)
(3) ik + jk ≠ il + jl (not on same diagonal)
(4) ik − jk ≠ il − jl (not on same diagonal)
To make it 3d you add:
(5) ih ≠ jh (not on the same vertical plane with height h)
https://medium.com/@abhijith0505/the-n-queens-in-3-d-640e20130912
answered Nov 14 '18 at 5:22
cMinorcMinor
13k64198335
13k64198335
Don't forget about diagonals with height.
– Mad Physicist
Nov 14 '18 at 5:26
add a comment |
Don't forget about diagonals with height.
– Mad Physicist
Nov 14 '18 at 5:26
Don't forget about diagonals with height.
– Mad Physicist
Nov 14 '18 at 5:26
Don't forget about diagonals with height.
– Mad Physicist
Nov 14 '18 at 5:26
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53293621%2fhow-to-extend-the-n-queens-problem-to-three-dimensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown