投資組合

Multi tool use投資組合(Investment portfolio),又名資產投資組合,所重視的是資產,例如股票、债券、外幣、期权、貴金屬、金融衍生工具、房地产、土地、古董、上市公司地位(俗稱「殼」)、藝術品、及至紅酒等。一個投資組合是一個投資者手上持手的資產性投資組合的成分,其中可分類為進取型、保守型等。一個優質的資產投資組合最理想的是具高流動性、平穩及较高收益、低投資風險等。
資產投資組合的成份不會包括消費品,例如跑车、电视机、化妝品、成衣等,因為它們都並無增值潛力,甚至只有折舊。
投资组合风险和收益的计算如下:
Portfolio Risk
For Example Correlation Coefficient = .4
Stocks | σ | % of Portfolio | Avg Return
|
---|
ABC Corp | 28 | 60% | 15%
|
Big Corp | 42 | 40% | 21%
|
Standard Deviation = weighted avg = 33.6 (Brealey, 2010 p.165) &(Brealey, 2010 p.170): The expected return on your portfolio is simply a weighted average of the expected returns on the individual stocks: Expected portfolio return=股票1的标准偏差σ1乘以x1股票1的投资组合所占百分比例+投资品2的标准偏差σ2乘以x2投资产品2所占的百分比例=σ1*r1+σ2*r2;
Standard Deviation
Portfolio Variance = 28.1 =x21σ21+x22σ22+2(x1x2ρ12σ1σ2)
Real Standard Deviation:
= (28)(.6) + (42)(.4) + 2(.4)(.6)(28)(42)(.4)
= 28.1 CORRECT
投资组合收益Return : r = (15%)(.60) + (21%)(.4) = 17.4%
delta是标准偏差Standard deviation,离正态分布远的偏差就大。
delta=variance投资组合方差的开平方,variance方差的算术平方根。方差计算公式如下:
Portfolio variance投资组合方差=x21σ21+x22σ22+2(x1x2ρ12σ1σ2)
Expected portfolio return=stock1 return * stock1 percent of portfolio + stock2 return * stock2 percent of portfolio
Reference:《Principles of Corporate Finance》10th Edition, Brealey 2010
相關
- 投资
- 证券投资基金
- 财务管理
- 个人理财
- 強積金
- VaR
- REITs
投資策略、投資心法
外參考
Aks u 9zDSSHXoXWW,OWQyUinFPzIe8QY51Dua 8i,SWouroL 6Pm,3Z
Popular posts from this blog
Ramiro Burr's New Blog - to go back: www.ramiroburr.com From Latin rock to reggaeton, boleros to blues,Tex-Mex to Tejano, conjunto to corridos and beyond, Ramiro Burr has it covered. If you have a new CD release, a trivia question or are looking for tour info, post a message here or e-mail Ramiro directly at: musicreporter@gmail.com Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64 By Ramiro Burr on October 23, 2008 8:40 AM | Permalink | Comments (12) | TrackBacks (0) UPDATE: Luis Silva Funeral Service details released Visitation 4-9 p.m. Saturday, Rosary service 6 p.m. Saturday at Porter Loring, 1101 McCullough Ave Funeral Service 10:30 a.m. Monday St. Anthony De Padua Catholic Church, Burial Service at Chapel Hills, 7735 Gibbs Sprawl Road. Porter Loring (210) 227-8221 Related New Flash: Irma Laura Lopez: long time record promoter killed in accident NewsFlash: 9:02 a.m. (New comments below) Luis Silva , one of the most well-known ...
1 I having trouble getting my ResourceDictionary.MergedDictionaries to load from app.xaml. My WPF app has a static class with a Main defined and startup object set to it. Within Main I created an instance of App and run it. The override OnStartup fires and the mainwindow.cs InitializeComponent gives the error "Message "Cannot find resource named 'MaterialDesignFloatingActionMiniAccentButton'. If I put the resources in the mainwindow.xaml everything is fine, but I wanted them to load at the app level so I they are not in each page. Any help appreciated. public partial class App protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e) base.OnStartup(e); var app = new MainWindow(); var context = new MainWindowViewModel(); app.DataContext = context; app.Show(); from the Main.. var app = new App(); app.Run(); app.xaml.. <Application x:Class="GS.Server.App" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:...
up vote 2 down vote favorite There is a clear pattern that show for two separate subsets (set of columns); If one value is missing in a column, values of other columns in the same subset are missing for any row. Here is a visualization of missing data My tries up until now, I used ycimpute library to learn from other values, and applied Iterforest. I noted, score of Logistic regression is so weak (0.6) and thought Iterforest might not learn enough or anyway, except from outer subset which might not be enough? for example the subset with 11 columns might learn from the other columns but not from within it's members, and the same goes for the subset with four columns. This bar plot show better quantity of missings So of course, dealing with missings is better than dropping rows because It would affect my prediction which does contain the same missings quantity relatively. Any better way to deal with these ? [EDIT] The nullity pattern is confirmed: machine-learning cor...