CppCon 2018, Nicolai Josuttis: Why are these interpreted as iterators?










34















Nicolai Josuttis' "The Nightmare of Initialization in C++" presentation at CppCon 2018 had, at one point, the following piece of code:



std::vector< std::string > v07 = "1", "2" ;


Nicolai said the following (transcription mine):




The problem is, what happens here is, we interpret these two parameters as iterators. So these are iterators, so this is the beginning of the range, and this is the end of the range, and they should refer to the same range of characters; because characters convert implicitly to strings this will compile. If you're lucky, you'll get a coredump. If not, you've got a big problem.




He lost me there. Can somebody explain what is going on here, exactly, step by step?










share|improve this question


























    34















    Nicolai Josuttis' "The Nightmare of Initialization in C++" presentation at CppCon 2018 had, at one point, the following piece of code:



    std::vector< std::string > v07 = "1", "2" ;


    Nicolai said the following (transcription mine):




    The problem is, what happens here is, we interpret these two parameters as iterators. So these are iterators, so this is the beginning of the range, and this is the end of the range, and they should refer to the same range of characters; because characters convert implicitly to strings this will compile. If you're lucky, you'll get a coredump. If not, you've got a big problem.




    He lost me there. Can somebody explain what is going on here, exactly, step by step?










    share|improve this question
























      34












      34








      34


      4






      Nicolai Josuttis' "The Nightmare of Initialization in C++" presentation at CppCon 2018 had, at one point, the following piece of code:



      std::vector< std::string > v07 = "1", "2" ;


      Nicolai said the following (transcription mine):




      The problem is, what happens here is, we interpret these two parameters as iterators. So these are iterators, so this is the beginning of the range, and this is the end of the range, and they should refer to the same range of characters; because characters convert implicitly to strings this will compile. If you're lucky, you'll get a coredump. If not, you've got a big problem.




      He lost me there. Can somebody explain what is going on here, exactly, step by step?










      share|improve this question














      Nicolai Josuttis' "The Nightmare of Initialization in C++" presentation at CppCon 2018 had, at one point, the following piece of code:



      std::vector< std::string > v07 = "1", "2" ;


      Nicolai said the following (transcription mine):




      The problem is, what happens here is, we interpret these two parameters as iterators. So these are iterators, so this is the beginning of the range, and this is the end of the range, and they should refer to the same range of characters; because characters convert implicitly to strings this will compile. If you're lucky, you'll get a coredump. If not, you've got a big problem.




      He lost me there. Can somebody explain what is going on here, exactly, step by step?







      c++ initialization c++17






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 15 '18 at 12:39









      DevSolarDevSolar

      48.4k1498171




      48.4k1498171






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          43














          Below code



          std::vector< std::string > v07 = "1", "2" ;


          is equivalent to



          std::string s = "1","2"; // call string(const char*, const char*)
          std::vector<std::string> v07 = s; // initializer list with one item


          the issue is with



           s="1","2";


          This calls string(const char* start, const char* end) constructor,
          but start and end must refer to the same string object. "1" and "2" are two different objects, so it leads to UB.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 3





            What exactly does UB stand for?

            – John
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:48






          • 1





            see stackoverflow.com/a/2766749/3729797 for UB, Undefined Behaviour

            – Julien Rousé
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:51











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53319710%2fcppcon-2018-nicolai-josuttis-why-are-these-interpreted-as-iterators%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          43














          Below code



          std::vector< std::string > v07 = "1", "2" ;


          is equivalent to



          std::string s = "1","2"; // call string(const char*, const char*)
          std::vector<std::string> v07 = s; // initializer list with one item


          the issue is with



           s="1","2";


          This calls string(const char* start, const char* end) constructor,
          but start and end must refer to the same string object. "1" and "2" are two different objects, so it leads to UB.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 3





            What exactly does UB stand for?

            – John
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:48






          • 1





            see stackoverflow.com/a/2766749/3729797 for UB, Undefined Behaviour

            – Julien Rousé
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:51
















          43














          Below code



          std::vector< std::string > v07 = "1", "2" ;


          is equivalent to



          std::string s = "1","2"; // call string(const char*, const char*)
          std::vector<std::string> v07 = s; // initializer list with one item


          the issue is with



           s="1","2";


          This calls string(const char* start, const char* end) constructor,
          but start and end must refer to the same string object. "1" and "2" are two different objects, so it leads to UB.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 3





            What exactly does UB stand for?

            – John
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:48






          • 1





            see stackoverflow.com/a/2766749/3729797 for UB, Undefined Behaviour

            – Julien Rousé
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:51














          43












          43








          43







          Below code



          std::vector< std::string > v07 = "1", "2" ;


          is equivalent to



          std::string s = "1","2"; // call string(const char*, const char*)
          std::vector<std::string> v07 = s; // initializer list with one item


          the issue is with



           s="1","2";


          This calls string(const char* start, const char* end) constructor,
          but start and end must refer to the same string object. "1" and "2" are two different objects, so it leads to UB.






          share|improve this answer















          Below code



          std::vector< std::string > v07 = "1", "2" ;


          is equivalent to



          std::string s = "1","2"; // call string(const char*, const char*)
          std::vector<std::string> v07 = s; // initializer list with one item


          the issue is with



           s="1","2";


          This calls string(const char* start, const char* end) constructor,
          but start and end must refer to the same string object. "1" and "2" are two different objects, so it leads to UB.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 15 '18 at 15:41









          MSalters

          135k8119270




          135k8119270










          answered Nov 15 '18 at 12:52









          rafix07rafix07

          8,0481715




          8,0481715







          • 3





            What exactly does UB stand for?

            – John
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:48






          • 1





            see stackoverflow.com/a/2766749/3729797 for UB, Undefined Behaviour

            – Julien Rousé
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:51













          • 3





            What exactly does UB stand for?

            – John
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:48






          • 1





            see stackoverflow.com/a/2766749/3729797 for UB, Undefined Behaviour

            – Julien Rousé
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:51








          3




          3





          What exactly does UB stand for?

          – John
          Nov 15 '18 at 20:48





          What exactly does UB stand for?

          – John
          Nov 15 '18 at 20:48




          1




          1





          see stackoverflow.com/a/2766749/3729797 for UB, Undefined Behaviour

          – Julien Rousé
          Nov 15 '18 at 20:51






          see stackoverflow.com/a/2766749/3729797 for UB, Undefined Behaviour

          – Julien Rousé
          Nov 15 '18 at 20:51




















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53319710%2fcppcon-2018-nicolai-josuttis-why-are-these-interpreted-as-iterators%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64

          政党

          天津地下鉄3号線