How to make assertions in Chisel be just warnings and not stop simulation
We have added assertions to our Chisel code, but we only want them to warn, not stop the simulation. Is there a way to tell Chisel to do this?
For example:
assert(x(1) =/= nxt_val(1))
We want this to just give us a warning, so we can collect the log, to find places where clock gating is most effective.
riscv chisel
add a comment |
We have added assertions to our Chisel code, but we only want them to warn, not stop the simulation. Is there a way to tell Chisel to do this?
For example:
assert(x(1) =/= nxt_val(1))
We want this to just give us a warning, so we can collect the log, to find places where clock gating is most effective.
riscv chisel
add a comment |
We have added assertions to our Chisel code, but we only want them to warn, not stop the simulation. Is there a way to tell Chisel to do this?
For example:
assert(x(1) =/= nxt_val(1))
We want this to just give us a warning, so we can collect the log, to find places where clock gating is most effective.
riscv chisel
We have added assertions to our Chisel code, but we only want them to warn, not stop the simulation. Is there a way to tell Chisel to do this?
For example:
assert(x(1) =/= nxt_val(1))
We want this to just give us a warning, so we can collect the log, to find places where clock gating is most effective.
riscv chisel
riscv chisel
asked Nov 12 '18 at 18:24
seanhalleseanhalle
389117
389117
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Can you just write a method that you pass the condition and perhaps a behavior flag.
object warnAssert {
def apply(condition: Bool, message: String = "", isFatal: Boolean = false)
(isFatal, message.isEmpty)
case (true, true) => assert(condition)
case (true, false) => assert(condition, message)
case (false, _) => when(bool) printf("Warning: %sn", message) // line number should get included here
add a comment |
Chick's answer is reasonable, although I suspect you're looking for something that Verilog simulators register as an error rather than a printf.
Unfortunately the simulation construct support in FIRRTL is pretty primitive--assert emitting $fatal
is an example of this. We generally have dealt with this via FIRRTL transforms, or simulator-specific stuff (implementing see our Verilator testing top for example). As discussed at the CCC, I think we should invest more effort in better simulation libraries. If you have ideas and suggestions, it would be super helpful if you could package them up in an RFC: https://github.com/freechipsproject/chisel3/issues.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53267994%2fhow-to-make-assertions-in-chisel-be-just-warnings-and-not-stop-simulation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Can you just write a method that you pass the condition and perhaps a behavior flag.
object warnAssert {
def apply(condition: Bool, message: String = "", isFatal: Boolean = false)
(isFatal, message.isEmpty)
case (true, true) => assert(condition)
case (true, false) => assert(condition, message)
case (false, _) => when(bool) printf("Warning: %sn", message) // line number should get included here
add a comment |
Can you just write a method that you pass the condition and perhaps a behavior flag.
object warnAssert {
def apply(condition: Bool, message: String = "", isFatal: Boolean = false)
(isFatal, message.isEmpty)
case (true, true) => assert(condition)
case (true, false) => assert(condition, message)
case (false, _) => when(bool) printf("Warning: %sn", message) // line number should get included here
add a comment |
Can you just write a method that you pass the condition and perhaps a behavior flag.
object warnAssert {
def apply(condition: Bool, message: String = "", isFatal: Boolean = false)
(isFatal, message.isEmpty)
case (true, true) => assert(condition)
case (true, false) => assert(condition, message)
case (false, _) => when(bool) printf("Warning: %sn", message) // line number should get included here
Can you just write a method that you pass the condition and perhaps a behavior flag.
object warnAssert {
def apply(condition: Bool, message: String = "", isFatal: Boolean = false)
(isFatal, message.isEmpty)
case (true, true) => assert(condition)
case (true, false) => assert(condition, message)
case (false, _) => when(bool) printf("Warning: %sn", message) // line number should get included here
answered Nov 13 '18 at 17:39
Chick MarkleyChick Markley
1,515810
1,515810
add a comment |
add a comment |
Chick's answer is reasonable, although I suspect you're looking for something that Verilog simulators register as an error rather than a printf.
Unfortunately the simulation construct support in FIRRTL is pretty primitive--assert emitting $fatal
is an example of this. We generally have dealt with this via FIRRTL transforms, or simulator-specific stuff (implementing see our Verilator testing top for example). As discussed at the CCC, I think we should invest more effort in better simulation libraries. If you have ideas and suggestions, it would be super helpful if you could package them up in an RFC: https://github.com/freechipsproject/chisel3/issues.
add a comment |
Chick's answer is reasonable, although I suspect you're looking for something that Verilog simulators register as an error rather than a printf.
Unfortunately the simulation construct support in FIRRTL is pretty primitive--assert emitting $fatal
is an example of this. We generally have dealt with this via FIRRTL transforms, or simulator-specific stuff (implementing see our Verilator testing top for example). As discussed at the CCC, I think we should invest more effort in better simulation libraries. If you have ideas and suggestions, it would be super helpful if you could package them up in an RFC: https://github.com/freechipsproject/chisel3/issues.
add a comment |
Chick's answer is reasonable, although I suspect you're looking for something that Verilog simulators register as an error rather than a printf.
Unfortunately the simulation construct support in FIRRTL is pretty primitive--assert emitting $fatal
is an example of this. We generally have dealt with this via FIRRTL transforms, or simulator-specific stuff (implementing see our Verilator testing top for example). As discussed at the CCC, I think we should invest more effort in better simulation libraries. If you have ideas and suggestions, it would be super helpful if you could package them up in an RFC: https://github.com/freechipsproject/chisel3/issues.
Chick's answer is reasonable, although I suspect you're looking for something that Verilog simulators register as an error rather than a printf.
Unfortunately the simulation construct support in FIRRTL is pretty primitive--assert emitting $fatal
is an example of this. We generally have dealt with this via FIRRTL transforms, or simulator-specific stuff (implementing see our Verilator testing top for example). As discussed at the CCC, I think we should invest more effort in better simulation libraries. If you have ideas and suggestions, it would be super helpful if you could package them up in an RFC: https://github.com/freechipsproject/chisel3/issues.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 19:37
jkoenigjkoenig
2,608717
2,608717
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53267994%2fhow-to-make-assertions-in-chisel-be-just-warnings-and-not-stop-simulation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown