Myujth

I had some serious speed issues with the LINQ in this code (variable names have been changed)

var A = _service.GetA(param1, param2); // Returns Enumerable results

var results = (from b in _B.All() // _B.All() returns IQueryable
 join c in _C.All() on b.Id equals c.Id // _C.All() returns IQueryable
 join a in A on a.Id equals c.Id
 where b.someId == id && a.boolVariable // A bool value
 select new
 
 ...
 ).ToList();

This LINQ took over 10 seconds to execute even though the number of rows in B and C tables were less than 100k.

I looked into this and by trial and error I managed to get the LINQ execution time to 200ms by changing the code to this:

var A = _service.GetA(param1, param2).Where(a => a.boolVariable); // Returns Enumerable results

var results = (from b in _B.All() // _B.All() returns IQueryable
 join c in _C.All() on b.Id equals c.Id // _C.All() returns IQueryable
 join a in A on a.Id equals c.Id
 where b.someId == id
 select new
 
 ...
 ).ToList();

So my question is, why does this simple change have such drastic effects on the LINQ performance? The only change is that I filter the Enumerable list beforehand, the A enumerable has about 30 items before filtering and 15 after filtering.

In your first scenario: first it joins all the records in A which would take long time to join, then filters out for a.boolVariable.

In your second scenario you have a smaller subset of records for A prior to joining - of course this would take less time to join.