Calculating the variance of sample, knowing the mean of population










3














Suppose that I somehow know the mean of the population. And I want to calculate the variance of a sample.
Should I subtract population mean or sample mean?
Is there any situation in which I should use population mean?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ali Slais is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • I think the question is somewhat unclear. Do you want to calculate the variance in the sample? Do you want to estimate the expected variance of the sample mean (i.e. variance in the mean if you repeated the sampling procedure)? Or do you want to obtain the best possible estimate for the population variance given your observed sample and prior knowledge of the population mean?
    – Jacob Socolar
    13 hours ago















3














Suppose that I somehow know the mean of the population. And I want to calculate the variance of a sample.
Should I subtract population mean or sample mean?
Is there any situation in which I should use population mean?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ali Slais is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • I think the question is somewhat unclear. Do you want to calculate the variance in the sample? Do you want to estimate the expected variance of the sample mean (i.e. variance in the mean if you repeated the sampling procedure)? Or do you want to obtain the best possible estimate for the population variance given your observed sample and prior knowledge of the population mean?
    – Jacob Socolar
    13 hours ago













3












3








3







Suppose that I somehow know the mean of the population. And I want to calculate the variance of a sample.
Should I subtract population mean or sample mean?
Is there any situation in which I should use population mean?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ali Slais is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Suppose that I somehow know the mean of the population. And I want to calculate the variance of a sample.
Should I subtract population mean or sample mean?
Is there any situation in which I should use population mean?







variance mean sample average population






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ali Slais is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ali Slais is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 16 hours ago





















New contributor




Ali Slais is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 20 hours ago









Ali Slais

162




162




New contributor




Ali Slais is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ali Slais is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ali Slais is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • I think the question is somewhat unclear. Do you want to calculate the variance in the sample? Do you want to estimate the expected variance of the sample mean (i.e. variance in the mean if you repeated the sampling procedure)? Or do you want to obtain the best possible estimate for the population variance given your observed sample and prior knowledge of the population mean?
    – Jacob Socolar
    13 hours ago
















  • I think the question is somewhat unclear. Do you want to calculate the variance in the sample? Do you want to estimate the expected variance of the sample mean (i.e. variance in the mean if you repeated the sampling procedure)? Or do you want to obtain the best possible estimate for the population variance given your observed sample and prior knowledge of the population mean?
    – Jacob Socolar
    13 hours ago















I think the question is somewhat unclear. Do you want to calculate the variance in the sample? Do you want to estimate the expected variance of the sample mean (i.e. variance in the mean if you repeated the sampling procedure)? Or do you want to obtain the best possible estimate for the population variance given your observed sample and prior knowledge of the population mean?
– Jacob Socolar
13 hours ago




I think the question is somewhat unclear. Do you want to calculate the variance in the sample? Do you want to estimate the expected variance of the sample mean (i.e. variance in the mean if you repeated the sampling procedure)? Or do you want to obtain the best possible estimate for the population variance given your observed sample and prior knowledge of the population mean?
– Jacob Socolar
13 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














No one would like to use sample estimator, when population parameter is known. So, if population mean is given, then use population mean, but then use $n$ in denominators instead of $n-1$ because no degree of freedom will be lost in this case.



So, sample variance (when population mean is not known)
$$s^2 = frac1n-1sum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - bar X right)^2$$



So, sample variance (when population mean is known)
$$s^2 = frac1nsum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - mu right)^2$$
where, $mu$ is population mean.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    0














    The true answer is vague: it depends on your prior model of the data. If you assumed the data to be normally distributed with a known mean, you could use the gamma distribution as the conjugate prior for Bayesian inference. Maybe use moment-matching estimates rather than using optimizing procedures for simplicity.



    The Bayesian approach might sound like overkill in such a simple context, but frequentist statistics depend a lot more on best-practices-like procedures that don't extend in a simple fashion to nonstandard problems like the one you're posing.






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "65"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Ali Slais is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f384415%2fcalculating-the-variance-of-sample-knowing-the-mean-of-population%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      No one would like to use sample estimator, when population parameter is known. So, if population mean is given, then use population mean, but then use $n$ in denominators instead of $n-1$ because no degree of freedom will be lost in this case.



      So, sample variance (when population mean is not known)
      $$s^2 = frac1n-1sum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - bar X right)^2$$



      So, sample variance (when population mean is known)
      $$s^2 = frac1nsum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - mu right)^2$$
      where, $mu$ is population mean.






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        3














        No one would like to use sample estimator, when population parameter is known. So, if population mean is given, then use population mean, but then use $n$ in denominators instead of $n-1$ because no degree of freedom will be lost in this case.



        So, sample variance (when population mean is not known)
        $$s^2 = frac1n-1sum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - bar X right)^2$$



        So, sample variance (when population mean is known)
        $$s^2 = frac1nsum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - mu right)^2$$
        where, $mu$ is population mean.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          3












          3








          3






          No one would like to use sample estimator, when population parameter is known. So, if population mean is given, then use population mean, but then use $n$ in denominators instead of $n-1$ because no degree of freedom will be lost in this case.



          So, sample variance (when population mean is not known)
          $$s^2 = frac1n-1sum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - bar X right)^2$$



          So, sample variance (when population mean is known)
          $$s^2 = frac1nsum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - mu right)^2$$
          where, $mu$ is population mean.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          No one would like to use sample estimator, when population parameter is known. So, if population mean is given, then use population mean, but then use $n$ in denominators instead of $n-1$ because no degree of freedom will be lost in this case.



          So, sample variance (when population mean is not known)
          $$s^2 = frac1n-1sum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - bar X right)^2$$



          So, sample variance (when population mean is known)
          $$s^2 = frac1nsum_i = 1^nleft(X_i - mu right)^2$$
          where, $mu$ is population mean.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 14 hours ago

























          answered 17 hours ago









          Neeraj

          1,166719




          1,166719























              0














              The true answer is vague: it depends on your prior model of the data. If you assumed the data to be normally distributed with a known mean, you could use the gamma distribution as the conjugate prior for Bayesian inference. Maybe use moment-matching estimates rather than using optimizing procedures for simplicity.



              The Bayesian approach might sound like overkill in such a simple context, but frequentist statistics depend a lot more on best-practices-like procedures that don't extend in a simple fashion to nonstandard problems like the one you're posing.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                0














                The true answer is vague: it depends on your prior model of the data. If you assumed the data to be normally distributed with a known mean, you could use the gamma distribution as the conjugate prior for Bayesian inference. Maybe use moment-matching estimates rather than using optimizing procedures for simplicity.



                The Bayesian approach might sound like overkill in such a simple context, but frequentist statistics depend a lot more on best-practices-like procedures that don't extend in a simple fashion to nonstandard problems like the one you're posing.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  The true answer is vague: it depends on your prior model of the data. If you assumed the data to be normally distributed with a known mean, you could use the gamma distribution as the conjugate prior for Bayesian inference. Maybe use moment-matching estimates rather than using optimizing procedures for simplicity.



                  The Bayesian approach might sound like overkill in such a simple context, but frequentist statistics depend a lot more on best-practices-like procedures that don't extend in a simple fashion to nonstandard problems like the one you're posing.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  The true answer is vague: it depends on your prior model of the data. If you assumed the data to be normally distributed with a known mean, you could use the gamma distribution as the conjugate prior for Bayesian inference. Maybe use moment-matching estimates rather than using optimizing procedures for simplicity.



                  The Bayesian approach might sound like overkill in such a simple context, but frequentist statistics depend a lot more on best-practices-like procedures that don't extend in a simple fashion to nonstandard problems like the one you're posing.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 16 hours ago









                  user8948

                  1205




                  1205




















                      Ali Slais is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Ali Slais is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Ali Slais is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Ali Slais is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f384415%2fcalculating-the-variance-of-sample-knowing-the-mean-of-population%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64

                      ReactJS Fetched API data displays live - need Data displayed static

                      政党