How to use @Bindable in child POJO?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I made a layout that must be used for 2 POJO. So i created an Interface like this:
public interface GameItemParent
...
boolean isChecked();
One of child classes:
public class FavoriteGame implements GameItemParent,Observable
@SerializedName(SerCons.C_CHECKED) private int checked;
private PropertyChangeRegistry registry = new PropertyChangeRegistry();
public FavoriteGame()
@Bindable public boolean isChecked()
return checked == 1;
public void setChecked(boolean checked, boolean notifyObserver)
this.checked = checked ? 1 : 0;
if (notifyObserver)
registry.notifyChange(this, BR.checked);
public void inverseChecked()
setChecked(!isChecked(), true);
@Override public void addOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.add(callback);
@Override public void removeOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.remove(callback);
...
the XML file that listens to 'isChecked' changes:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<layout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
>
<data>
<import type="android.view.View"/>
<variable
name="game"
type="com.consoleco.console.objectParents.GameItemParent"
/>
</data>
<androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout
.../>
<androidx.appcompat.widget.AppCompatCheckBox
android:id="@+id/checkBox"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:checked="@game.checked"
android:visibility="@game.hasCheckButton() ? View.VISIBLE : View.GONE"
app:buttonTint="?attr/colorAccent"
app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintStart_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
/>
</androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout>
</layout>
As you noticed, I declared 'GameItemParent' interface as 'game' data. Because I have to use this XML for another child too.
Now when I change 'isChecked' at runtime, the UI (actually the checkbox) doesn't get change.
android android-databinding
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I made a layout that must be used for 2 POJO. So i created an Interface like this:
public interface GameItemParent
...
boolean isChecked();
One of child classes:
public class FavoriteGame implements GameItemParent,Observable
@SerializedName(SerCons.C_CHECKED) private int checked;
private PropertyChangeRegistry registry = new PropertyChangeRegistry();
public FavoriteGame()
@Bindable public boolean isChecked()
return checked == 1;
public void setChecked(boolean checked, boolean notifyObserver)
this.checked = checked ? 1 : 0;
if (notifyObserver)
registry.notifyChange(this, BR.checked);
public void inverseChecked()
setChecked(!isChecked(), true);
@Override public void addOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.add(callback);
@Override public void removeOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.remove(callback);
...
the XML file that listens to 'isChecked' changes:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<layout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
>
<data>
<import type="android.view.View"/>
<variable
name="game"
type="com.consoleco.console.objectParents.GameItemParent"
/>
</data>
<androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout
.../>
<androidx.appcompat.widget.AppCompatCheckBox
android:id="@+id/checkBox"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:checked="@game.checked"
android:visibility="@game.hasCheckButton() ? View.VISIBLE : View.GONE"
app:buttonTint="?attr/colorAccent"
app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintStart_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
/>
</androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout>
</layout>
As you noticed, I declared 'GameItemParent' interface as 'game' data. Because I have to use this XML for another child too.
Now when I change 'isChecked' at runtime, the UI (actually the checkbox) doesn't get change.
android android-databinding
Why are you not usingBaseObservable
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:03
Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:04
Then you can make the parent class only extendingBaseObservable
?
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:05
I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:11
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I made a layout that must be used for 2 POJO. So i created an Interface like this:
public interface GameItemParent
...
boolean isChecked();
One of child classes:
public class FavoriteGame implements GameItemParent,Observable
@SerializedName(SerCons.C_CHECKED) private int checked;
private PropertyChangeRegistry registry = new PropertyChangeRegistry();
public FavoriteGame()
@Bindable public boolean isChecked()
return checked == 1;
public void setChecked(boolean checked, boolean notifyObserver)
this.checked = checked ? 1 : 0;
if (notifyObserver)
registry.notifyChange(this, BR.checked);
public void inverseChecked()
setChecked(!isChecked(), true);
@Override public void addOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.add(callback);
@Override public void removeOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.remove(callback);
...
the XML file that listens to 'isChecked' changes:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<layout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
>
<data>
<import type="android.view.View"/>
<variable
name="game"
type="com.consoleco.console.objectParents.GameItemParent"
/>
</data>
<androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout
.../>
<androidx.appcompat.widget.AppCompatCheckBox
android:id="@+id/checkBox"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:checked="@game.checked"
android:visibility="@game.hasCheckButton() ? View.VISIBLE : View.GONE"
app:buttonTint="?attr/colorAccent"
app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintStart_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
/>
</androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout>
</layout>
As you noticed, I declared 'GameItemParent' interface as 'game' data. Because I have to use this XML for another child too.
Now when I change 'isChecked' at runtime, the UI (actually the checkbox) doesn't get change.
android android-databinding
I made a layout that must be used for 2 POJO. So i created an Interface like this:
public interface GameItemParent
...
boolean isChecked();
One of child classes:
public class FavoriteGame implements GameItemParent,Observable
@SerializedName(SerCons.C_CHECKED) private int checked;
private PropertyChangeRegistry registry = new PropertyChangeRegistry();
public FavoriteGame()
@Bindable public boolean isChecked()
return checked == 1;
public void setChecked(boolean checked, boolean notifyObserver)
this.checked = checked ? 1 : 0;
if (notifyObserver)
registry.notifyChange(this, BR.checked);
public void inverseChecked()
setChecked(!isChecked(), true);
@Override public void addOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.add(callback);
@Override public void removeOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.remove(callback);
...
the XML file that listens to 'isChecked' changes:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<layout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
>
<data>
<import type="android.view.View"/>
<variable
name="game"
type="com.consoleco.console.objectParents.GameItemParent"
/>
</data>
<androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout
.../>
<androidx.appcompat.widget.AppCompatCheckBox
android:id="@+id/checkBox"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:checked="@game.checked"
android:visibility="@game.hasCheckButton() ? View.VISIBLE : View.GONE"
app:buttonTint="?attr/colorAccent"
app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintStart_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
/>
</androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout>
</layout>
As you noticed, I declared 'GameItemParent' interface as 'game' data. Because I have to use this XML for another child too.
Now when I change 'isChecked' at runtime, the UI (actually the checkbox) doesn't get change.
android android-databinding
android android-databinding
edited Nov 12 at 7:49
asked Nov 11 at 8:14
Doctor Henry
527414
527414
Why are you not usingBaseObservable
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:03
Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:04
Then you can make the parent class only extendingBaseObservable
?
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:05
I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:11
add a comment |
Why are you not usingBaseObservable
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:03
Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:04
Then you can make the parent class only extendingBaseObservable
?
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:05
I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:11
Why are you not using
BaseObservable
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:03
Why are you not using
BaseObservable
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:03
Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:04
Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:04
Then you can make the parent class only extending
BaseObservable
?– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:05
Then you can make the parent class only extending
BaseObservable
?– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:05
I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:11
I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:11
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The GameItemParent
is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable
:
public interface GameItemParent extends Observable
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();
Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 6:35
1
Did you also add the@Bindable
annotation toisChecked()
?
– tynn
Nov 12 at 7:15
I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 7:51
My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The GameItemParent
is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable
:
public interface GameItemParent extends Observable
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();
Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 6:35
1
Did you also add the@Bindable
annotation toisChecked()
?
– tynn
Nov 12 at 7:15
I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 7:51
My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:05
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The GameItemParent
is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable
:
public interface GameItemParent extends Observable
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();
Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 6:35
1
Did you also add the@Bindable
annotation toisChecked()
?
– tynn
Nov 12 at 7:15
I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 7:51
My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:05
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The GameItemParent
is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable
:
public interface GameItemParent extends Observable
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();
The GameItemParent
is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable
:
public interface GameItemParent extends Observable
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();
edited Nov 12 at 7:14
answered Nov 11 at 19:56
tynn
18.8k54374
18.8k54374
Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 6:35
1
Did you also add the@Bindable
annotation toisChecked()
?
– tynn
Nov 12 at 7:15
I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 7:51
My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:05
add a comment |
Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 6:35
1
Did you also add the@Bindable
annotation toisChecked()
?
– tynn
Nov 12 at 7:15
I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 7:51
My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:05
Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 6:35
Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 6:35
1
1
Did you also add the
@Bindable
annotation to isChecked()
?– tynn
Nov 12 at 7:15
Did you also add the
@Bindable
annotation to isChecked()
?– tynn
Nov 12 at 7:15
I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 7:51
I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 7:51
My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:05
My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53246938%2fhow-to-use-bindable-in-child-pojo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why are you not using
BaseObservable
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:03
Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:04
Then you can make the parent class only extending
BaseObservable
?– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:05
I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:11