How to use @Bindable in child POJO?









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I made a layout that must be used for 2 POJO. So i created an Interface like this:



public interface GameItemParent 
...
boolean isChecked();



One of child classes:



public class FavoriteGame implements GameItemParent,Observable 
@SerializedName(SerCons.C_CHECKED) private int checked;

private PropertyChangeRegistry registry = new PropertyChangeRegistry();

public FavoriteGame()


@Bindable public boolean isChecked()
return checked == 1;


public void setChecked(boolean checked, boolean notifyObserver)
this.checked = checked ? 1 : 0;
if (notifyObserver)
registry.notifyChange(this, BR.checked);


public void inverseChecked()
setChecked(!isChecked(), true);


@Override public void addOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.add(callback);


@Override public void removeOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.remove(callback);

...



the XML file that listens to 'isChecked' changes:



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<layout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
>
<data>
<import type="android.view.View"/>
<variable
name="game"
type="com.consoleco.console.objectParents.GameItemParent"
/>
</data>
<androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout
.../>
<androidx.appcompat.widget.AppCompatCheckBox
android:id="@+id/checkBox"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:checked="@game.checked"
android:visibility="@game.hasCheckButton() ? View.VISIBLE : View.GONE"
app:buttonTint="?attr/colorAccent"
app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintStart_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
/>
</androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout>
</layout>


As you noticed, I declared 'GameItemParent' interface as 'game' data. Because I have to use this XML for another child too.



Now when I change 'isChecked' at runtime, the UI (actually the checkbox) doesn't get change.










share|improve this question























  • Why are you not using BaseObservable
    – Khemraj
    Nov 12 at 8:03











  • Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:04










  • Then you can make the parent class only extending BaseObservable?
    – Khemraj
    Nov 12 at 8:05










  • I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:11














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I made a layout that must be used for 2 POJO. So i created an Interface like this:



public interface GameItemParent 
...
boolean isChecked();



One of child classes:



public class FavoriteGame implements GameItemParent,Observable 
@SerializedName(SerCons.C_CHECKED) private int checked;

private PropertyChangeRegistry registry = new PropertyChangeRegistry();

public FavoriteGame()


@Bindable public boolean isChecked()
return checked == 1;


public void setChecked(boolean checked, boolean notifyObserver)
this.checked = checked ? 1 : 0;
if (notifyObserver)
registry.notifyChange(this, BR.checked);


public void inverseChecked()
setChecked(!isChecked(), true);


@Override public void addOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.add(callback);


@Override public void removeOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.remove(callback);

...



the XML file that listens to 'isChecked' changes:



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<layout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
>
<data>
<import type="android.view.View"/>
<variable
name="game"
type="com.consoleco.console.objectParents.GameItemParent"
/>
</data>
<androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout
.../>
<androidx.appcompat.widget.AppCompatCheckBox
android:id="@+id/checkBox"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:checked="@game.checked"
android:visibility="@game.hasCheckButton() ? View.VISIBLE : View.GONE"
app:buttonTint="?attr/colorAccent"
app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintStart_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
/>
</androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout>
</layout>


As you noticed, I declared 'GameItemParent' interface as 'game' data. Because I have to use this XML for another child too.



Now when I change 'isChecked' at runtime, the UI (actually the checkbox) doesn't get change.










share|improve this question























  • Why are you not using BaseObservable
    – Khemraj
    Nov 12 at 8:03











  • Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:04










  • Then you can make the parent class only extending BaseObservable?
    – Khemraj
    Nov 12 at 8:05










  • I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:11












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I made a layout that must be used for 2 POJO. So i created an Interface like this:



public interface GameItemParent 
...
boolean isChecked();



One of child classes:



public class FavoriteGame implements GameItemParent,Observable 
@SerializedName(SerCons.C_CHECKED) private int checked;

private PropertyChangeRegistry registry = new PropertyChangeRegistry();

public FavoriteGame()


@Bindable public boolean isChecked()
return checked == 1;


public void setChecked(boolean checked, boolean notifyObserver)
this.checked = checked ? 1 : 0;
if (notifyObserver)
registry.notifyChange(this, BR.checked);


public void inverseChecked()
setChecked(!isChecked(), true);


@Override public void addOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.add(callback);


@Override public void removeOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.remove(callback);

...



the XML file that listens to 'isChecked' changes:



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<layout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
>
<data>
<import type="android.view.View"/>
<variable
name="game"
type="com.consoleco.console.objectParents.GameItemParent"
/>
</data>
<androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout
.../>
<androidx.appcompat.widget.AppCompatCheckBox
android:id="@+id/checkBox"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:checked="@game.checked"
android:visibility="@game.hasCheckButton() ? View.VISIBLE : View.GONE"
app:buttonTint="?attr/colorAccent"
app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintStart_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
/>
</androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout>
</layout>


As you noticed, I declared 'GameItemParent' interface as 'game' data. Because I have to use this XML for another child too.



Now when I change 'isChecked' at runtime, the UI (actually the checkbox) doesn't get change.










share|improve this question















I made a layout that must be used for 2 POJO. So i created an Interface like this:



public interface GameItemParent 
...
boolean isChecked();



One of child classes:



public class FavoriteGame implements GameItemParent,Observable 
@SerializedName(SerCons.C_CHECKED) private int checked;

private PropertyChangeRegistry registry = new PropertyChangeRegistry();

public FavoriteGame()


@Bindable public boolean isChecked()
return checked == 1;


public void setChecked(boolean checked, boolean notifyObserver)
this.checked = checked ? 1 : 0;
if (notifyObserver)
registry.notifyChange(this, BR.checked);


public void inverseChecked()
setChecked(!isChecked(), true);


@Override public void addOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.add(callback);


@Override public void removeOnPropertyChangedCallback(OnPropertyChangedCallback callback)
registry.remove(callback);

...



the XML file that listens to 'isChecked' changes:



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<layout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
>
<data>
<import type="android.view.View"/>
<variable
name="game"
type="com.consoleco.console.objectParents.GameItemParent"
/>
</data>
<androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout
.../>
<androidx.appcompat.widget.AppCompatCheckBox
android:id="@+id/checkBox"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:checked="@game.checked"
android:visibility="@game.hasCheckButton() ? View.VISIBLE : View.GONE"
app:buttonTint="?attr/colorAccent"
app:layout_constraintBottom_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintEnd_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintStart_toEndOf="@+id/icon"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="@+id/icon"
/>
</androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout>
</layout>


As you noticed, I declared 'GameItemParent' interface as 'game' data. Because I have to use this XML for another child too.



Now when I change 'isChecked' at runtime, the UI (actually the checkbox) doesn't get change.







android android-databinding






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 at 7:49

























asked Nov 11 at 8:14









Doctor Henry

527414




527414











  • Why are you not using BaseObservable
    – Khemraj
    Nov 12 at 8:03











  • Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:04










  • Then you can make the parent class only extending BaseObservable?
    – Khemraj
    Nov 12 at 8:05










  • I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:11
















  • Why are you not using BaseObservable
    – Khemraj
    Nov 12 at 8:03











  • Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:04










  • Then you can make the parent class only extending BaseObservable?
    – Khemraj
    Nov 12 at 8:05










  • I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:11















Why are you not using BaseObservable
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:03





Why are you not using BaseObservable
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:03













Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:04




Because I extended children from another parent and cannot use inheritance
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:04












Then you can make the parent class only extending BaseObservable?
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:05




Then you can make the parent class only extending BaseObservable?
– Khemraj
Nov 12 at 8:05












I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:11




I can't extend parent class from BaseObservable.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:11












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The GameItemParent is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable:



public interface GameItemParent extends Observable 
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 6:35







  • 1




    Did you also add the @Bindable annotation to isChecked()?
    – tynn
    Nov 12 at 7:15










  • I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 7:51










  • My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:05











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53246938%2fhow-to-use-bindable-in-child-pojo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The GameItemParent is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable:



public interface GameItemParent extends Observable 
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 6:35







  • 1




    Did you also add the @Bindable annotation to isChecked()?
    – tynn
    Nov 12 at 7:15










  • I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 7:51










  • My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:05















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The GameItemParent is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable:



public interface GameItemParent extends Observable 
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 6:35







  • 1




    Did you also add the @Bindable annotation to isChecked()?
    – tynn
    Nov 12 at 7:15










  • I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 7:51










  • My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:05













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






The GameItemParent is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable:



public interface GameItemParent extends Observable 
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();






share|improve this answer














The GameItemParent is a simple interface and therefore the binding library only knows about the property itself. It should be working, when it also extends the Observable:



public interface GameItemParent extends Observable 
...
@Bindable boolean isChecked();







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 12 at 7:14

























answered Nov 11 at 19:56









tynn

18.8k54374




18.8k54374











  • Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 6:35







  • 1




    Did you also add the @Bindable annotation to isChecked()?
    – tynn
    Nov 12 at 7:15










  • I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 7:51










  • My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:05

















  • Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 6:35







  • 1




    Did you also add the @Bindable annotation to isChecked()?
    – tynn
    Nov 12 at 7:15










  • I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 7:51










  • My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
    – Doctor Henry
    Nov 12 at 8:05
















Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 6:35





Thanks. I did this before (and add addOnPropertyChangedCallback,... in child class). But not works.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 6:35





1




1




Did you also add the @Bindable annotation to isChecked()?
– tynn
Nov 12 at 7:15




Did you also add the @Bindable annotation to isChecked()?
– tynn
Nov 12 at 7:15












I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 7:51




I used @Bindable. But didn't work again.
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 7:51












My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:05





My apologize. Your solution worked. The problem was with this function: public void inverseChecked() setChecked(isChecked(), true); .
– Doctor Henry
Nov 12 at 8:05


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53246938%2fhow-to-use-bindable-in-child-pojo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64

政党

天津地下鉄3号線