Modifying PagedList in Android Paging Architecture library









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2












I'm currently looking into incorporating the Paging Architecture library (version 2.1.0-beta01 at the time of writing) into my app. One components is a list which allows the user to delete individual items from it. This list is network-only and caching localy with Room does not make sense.



PagedList is immutable and does not support modification. I have read that having a copy of the list which is than modified and returned as the new one is the way to go. The documentation states the same:




If you have more granular update signals, such as a network API signaling an update to a single item in the list, it's recommended to load data from the network into memory. Then present that data to the PagedList via a DataSource that wraps an in-memory snapshot. Each time the in-memory copy changes, invalidate the previous DataSource, and a new one wrapping the new state of the snapshot can be created.




I currently have the basic recommended implementation to show a simple list. My DataSource looks like this:



class MyDataSource<SomeItem> : PageKeyedDataSource<Int, SomeItem>() 

override fun loadInitial(params: LoadInitialParams<Int>, callback: LoadInitialCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
// Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.


override fun loadAfter(params: LoadParams<Int>, callback: LoadCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
// Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.


override fun loadBefore(params: LoadParams<Int>, callback: LoadCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
// Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.




How would a concrete implementation of an in-memory cache (without Room and without invalidating the entire dataset) as referenced in the documentation look like?










share|improve this question



























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    I'm currently looking into incorporating the Paging Architecture library (version 2.1.0-beta01 at the time of writing) into my app. One components is a list which allows the user to delete individual items from it. This list is network-only and caching localy with Room does not make sense.



    PagedList is immutable and does not support modification. I have read that having a copy of the list which is than modified and returned as the new one is the way to go. The documentation states the same:




    If you have more granular update signals, such as a network API signaling an update to a single item in the list, it's recommended to load data from the network into memory. Then present that data to the PagedList via a DataSource that wraps an in-memory snapshot. Each time the in-memory copy changes, invalidate the previous DataSource, and a new one wrapping the new state of the snapshot can be created.




    I currently have the basic recommended implementation to show a simple list. My DataSource looks like this:



    class MyDataSource<SomeItem> : PageKeyedDataSource<Int, SomeItem>() 

    override fun loadInitial(params: LoadInitialParams<Int>, callback: LoadInitialCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
    // Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.


    override fun loadAfter(params: LoadParams<Int>, callback: LoadCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
    // Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.


    override fun loadBefore(params: LoadParams<Int>, callback: LoadCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
    // Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.




    How would a concrete implementation of an in-memory cache (without Room and without invalidating the entire dataset) as referenced in the documentation look like?










    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      I'm currently looking into incorporating the Paging Architecture library (version 2.1.0-beta01 at the time of writing) into my app. One components is a list which allows the user to delete individual items from it. This list is network-only and caching localy with Room does not make sense.



      PagedList is immutable and does not support modification. I have read that having a copy of the list which is than modified and returned as the new one is the way to go. The documentation states the same:




      If you have more granular update signals, such as a network API signaling an update to a single item in the list, it's recommended to load data from the network into memory. Then present that data to the PagedList via a DataSource that wraps an in-memory snapshot. Each time the in-memory copy changes, invalidate the previous DataSource, and a new one wrapping the new state of the snapshot can be created.




      I currently have the basic recommended implementation to show a simple list. My DataSource looks like this:



      class MyDataSource<SomeItem> : PageKeyedDataSource<Int, SomeItem>() 

      override fun loadInitial(params: LoadInitialParams<Int>, callback: LoadInitialCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
      // Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.


      override fun loadAfter(params: LoadParams<Int>, callback: LoadCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
      // Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.


      override fun loadBefore(params: LoadParams<Int>, callback: LoadCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
      // Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.




      How would a concrete implementation of an in-memory cache (without Room and without invalidating the entire dataset) as referenced in the documentation look like?










      share|improve this question















      I'm currently looking into incorporating the Paging Architecture library (version 2.1.0-beta01 at the time of writing) into my app. One components is a list which allows the user to delete individual items from it. This list is network-only and caching localy with Room does not make sense.



      PagedList is immutable and does not support modification. I have read that having a copy of the list which is than modified and returned as the new one is the way to go. The documentation states the same:




      If you have more granular update signals, such as a network API signaling an update to a single item in the list, it's recommended to load data from the network into memory. Then present that data to the PagedList via a DataSource that wraps an in-memory snapshot. Each time the in-memory copy changes, invalidate the previous DataSource, and a new one wrapping the new state of the snapshot can be created.




      I currently have the basic recommended implementation to show a simple list. My DataSource looks like this:



      class MyDataSource<SomeItem> : PageKeyedDataSource<Int, SomeItem>() 

      override fun loadInitial(params: LoadInitialParams<Int>, callback: LoadInitialCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
      // Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.


      override fun loadAfter(params: LoadParams<Int>, callback: LoadCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
      // Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.


      override fun loadBefore(params: LoadParams<Int>, callback: LoadCallback<Int, SomeItem>)
      // Simple load from API and notification of `callback`.




      How would a concrete implementation of an in-memory cache (without Room and without invalidating the entire dataset) as referenced in the documentation look like?







      android kotlin android-architecture-components android-paging






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 17 at 22:44









      Martin Zeitler

      12.2k33560




      12.2k33560










      asked Nov 10 at 21:43









      rubengees

      1,26911021




      1,26911021






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          You are correct in that a DataSource is meant to hold immutable data.
          I believe this is because Room and Paging Library is trying to have more opinionated design decisions and advocate for immutable data.



          This is why in the official docs, they have a section for updating or mutating your dataset should invalidate the datasource when such a change occurs.




          Updating Paged Data: If you have more granular update signals, such as a network API signaling an update to a single item in the list, it's recommended to load data from network into memory. Then present that data to the PagedList via a DataSource that wraps an in-memory snapshot. Each time the in-memory copy changes, invalidate the previous DataSource, and a new one wrapping the new state of the snapshot can be created.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource




          With that in mind, I believe it's possible to solve the problem you described using a couple of steps.



          This may not be the cleanest way, as it involves 2 steps.



          You can get a reference the the snapshot that the PagedList is holding, which is a type MutableList. Then, you can just remove or update the item inside that snapshot, without invalidating the data source.



          Then step two would be to calling something like notifyItemRemoved(index) or notifyItemChanged(index).



          Since you can't force the DataSource to notify the observers of the change, you'll have to do that manually.



          pagedList.snapshot().remove(index) // Removes item from the pagedList
          adapter.notifyItemRemoved(index) // Triggers recyclerview to redraw/rebind to account for the deleted item.



          There maybe a better solution found in your DataSource.Factory.
          According to the official docs, your DataSource.Factory should be the one to emit a new PagedList once the data is updated.




          Updating Paged Data: To page in data from a source that does provide updates, you can create a DataSource.Factory, where each DataSource created is invalidated when an update to the data set occurs that makes the current snapshot invalid. For example, when paging a query from the Database, and the table being queried inserts or removes items. You can also use a DataSource.Factory to provide multiple versions of network-paged lists. If reloading all content (e.g. in response to an action like swipe-to-refresh) is required to get a new version of data, you can connect an explicit refresh signal to call invalidate() on the current DataSource.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource



          I haven't found a good solution for this second approach however.






          share|improve this answer






















          • Upvoted for the detailed answer and for the effort
            – Ümañg ßürmån
            Nov 23 at 7:56










          • Thank you for this detailed answer, but this approach does not work. The snapshot returned may be of type MutableList, but does not actually implement the interface. Calling for example removeAt yields an UnsupportedOperationException. Also, the documentation states that snapshots are not meant for reflecting modification and are in fact also immutable. So thanks for the answer, but downvoting, because it's incorrect and may mislead other people.
            – rubengees
            Nov 23 at 20:57











          • Ah, I see. Then I the only other way I can think of is the second option mentioned above, and utilizing the DataSource.Factory.
            – Felipe Roriz
            Nov 24 at 2:49










          • Yes, that seems the way to go. I have not yet found a way of implementing that and tried to get help on that with this question.
            – rubengees
            Nov 25 at 0:21










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53243704%2fmodifying-pagedlist-in-android-paging-architecture-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          You are correct in that a DataSource is meant to hold immutable data.
          I believe this is because Room and Paging Library is trying to have more opinionated design decisions and advocate for immutable data.



          This is why in the official docs, they have a section for updating or mutating your dataset should invalidate the datasource when such a change occurs.




          Updating Paged Data: If you have more granular update signals, such as a network API signaling an update to a single item in the list, it's recommended to load data from network into memory. Then present that data to the PagedList via a DataSource that wraps an in-memory snapshot. Each time the in-memory copy changes, invalidate the previous DataSource, and a new one wrapping the new state of the snapshot can be created.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource




          With that in mind, I believe it's possible to solve the problem you described using a couple of steps.



          This may not be the cleanest way, as it involves 2 steps.



          You can get a reference the the snapshot that the PagedList is holding, which is a type MutableList. Then, you can just remove or update the item inside that snapshot, without invalidating the data source.



          Then step two would be to calling something like notifyItemRemoved(index) or notifyItemChanged(index).



          Since you can't force the DataSource to notify the observers of the change, you'll have to do that manually.



          pagedList.snapshot().remove(index) // Removes item from the pagedList
          adapter.notifyItemRemoved(index) // Triggers recyclerview to redraw/rebind to account for the deleted item.



          There maybe a better solution found in your DataSource.Factory.
          According to the official docs, your DataSource.Factory should be the one to emit a new PagedList once the data is updated.




          Updating Paged Data: To page in data from a source that does provide updates, you can create a DataSource.Factory, where each DataSource created is invalidated when an update to the data set occurs that makes the current snapshot invalid. For example, when paging a query from the Database, and the table being queried inserts or removes items. You can also use a DataSource.Factory to provide multiple versions of network-paged lists. If reloading all content (e.g. in response to an action like swipe-to-refresh) is required to get a new version of data, you can connect an explicit refresh signal to call invalidate() on the current DataSource.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource



          I haven't found a good solution for this second approach however.






          share|improve this answer






















          • Upvoted for the detailed answer and for the effort
            – Ümañg ßürmån
            Nov 23 at 7:56










          • Thank you for this detailed answer, but this approach does not work. The snapshot returned may be of type MutableList, but does not actually implement the interface. Calling for example removeAt yields an UnsupportedOperationException. Also, the documentation states that snapshots are not meant for reflecting modification and are in fact also immutable. So thanks for the answer, but downvoting, because it's incorrect and may mislead other people.
            – rubengees
            Nov 23 at 20:57











          • Ah, I see. Then I the only other way I can think of is the second option mentioned above, and utilizing the DataSource.Factory.
            – Felipe Roriz
            Nov 24 at 2:49










          • Yes, that seems the way to go. I have not yet found a way of implementing that and tried to get help on that with this question.
            – rubengees
            Nov 25 at 0:21














          up vote
          0
          down vote













          You are correct in that a DataSource is meant to hold immutable data.
          I believe this is because Room and Paging Library is trying to have more opinionated design decisions and advocate for immutable data.



          This is why in the official docs, they have a section for updating or mutating your dataset should invalidate the datasource when such a change occurs.




          Updating Paged Data: If you have more granular update signals, such as a network API signaling an update to a single item in the list, it's recommended to load data from network into memory. Then present that data to the PagedList via a DataSource that wraps an in-memory snapshot. Each time the in-memory copy changes, invalidate the previous DataSource, and a new one wrapping the new state of the snapshot can be created.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource




          With that in mind, I believe it's possible to solve the problem you described using a couple of steps.



          This may not be the cleanest way, as it involves 2 steps.



          You can get a reference the the snapshot that the PagedList is holding, which is a type MutableList. Then, you can just remove or update the item inside that snapshot, without invalidating the data source.



          Then step two would be to calling something like notifyItemRemoved(index) or notifyItemChanged(index).



          Since you can't force the DataSource to notify the observers of the change, you'll have to do that manually.



          pagedList.snapshot().remove(index) // Removes item from the pagedList
          adapter.notifyItemRemoved(index) // Triggers recyclerview to redraw/rebind to account for the deleted item.



          There maybe a better solution found in your DataSource.Factory.
          According to the official docs, your DataSource.Factory should be the one to emit a new PagedList once the data is updated.




          Updating Paged Data: To page in data from a source that does provide updates, you can create a DataSource.Factory, where each DataSource created is invalidated when an update to the data set occurs that makes the current snapshot invalid. For example, when paging a query from the Database, and the table being queried inserts or removes items. You can also use a DataSource.Factory to provide multiple versions of network-paged lists. If reloading all content (e.g. in response to an action like swipe-to-refresh) is required to get a new version of data, you can connect an explicit refresh signal to call invalidate() on the current DataSource.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource



          I haven't found a good solution for this second approach however.






          share|improve this answer






















          • Upvoted for the detailed answer and for the effort
            – Ümañg ßürmån
            Nov 23 at 7:56










          • Thank you for this detailed answer, but this approach does not work. The snapshot returned may be of type MutableList, but does not actually implement the interface. Calling for example removeAt yields an UnsupportedOperationException. Also, the documentation states that snapshots are not meant for reflecting modification and are in fact also immutable. So thanks for the answer, but downvoting, because it's incorrect and may mislead other people.
            – rubengees
            Nov 23 at 20:57











          • Ah, I see. Then I the only other way I can think of is the second option mentioned above, and utilizing the DataSource.Factory.
            – Felipe Roriz
            Nov 24 at 2:49










          • Yes, that seems the way to go. I have not yet found a way of implementing that and tried to get help on that with this question.
            – rubengees
            Nov 25 at 0:21












          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          You are correct in that a DataSource is meant to hold immutable data.
          I believe this is because Room and Paging Library is trying to have more opinionated design decisions and advocate for immutable data.



          This is why in the official docs, they have a section for updating or mutating your dataset should invalidate the datasource when such a change occurs.




          Updating Paged Data: If you have more granular update signals, such as a network API signaling an update to a single item in the list, it's recommended to load data from network into memory. Then present that data to the PagedList via a DataSource that wraps an in-memory snapshot. Each time the in-memory copy changes, invalidate the previous DataSource, and a new one wrapping the new state of the snapshot can be created.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource




          With that in mind, I believe it's possible to solve the problem you described using a couple of steps.



          This may not be the cleanest way, as it involves 2 steps.



          You can get a reference the the snapshot that the PagedList is holding, which is a type MutableList. Then, you can just remove or update the item inside that snapshot, without invalidating the data source.



          Then step two would be to calling something like notifyItemRemoved(index) or notifyItemChanged(index).



          Since you can't force the DataSource to notify the observers of the change, you'll have to do that manually.



          pagedList.snapshot().remove(index) // Removes item from the pagedList
          adapter.notifyItemRemoved(index) // Triggers recyclerview to redraw/rebind to account for the deleted item.



          There maybe a better solution found in your DataSource.Factory.
          According to the official docs, your DataSource.Factory should be the one to emit a new PagedList once the data is updated.




          Updating Paged Data: To page in data from a source that does provide updates, you can create a DataSource.Factory, where each DataSource created is invalidated when an update to the data set occurs that makes the current snapshot invalid. For example, when paging a query from the Database, and the table being queried inserts or removes items. You can also use a DataSource.Factory to provide multiple versions of network-paged lists. If reloading all content (e.g. in response to an action like swipe-to-refresh) is required to get a new version of data, you can connect an explicit refresh signal to call invalidate() on the current DataSource.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource



          I haven't found a good solution for this second approach however.






          share|improve this answer














          You are correct in that a DataSource is meant to hold immutable data.
          I believe this is because Room and Paging Library is trying to have more opinionated design decisions and advocate for immutable data.



          This is why in the official docs, they have a section for updating or mutating your dataset should invalidate the datasource when such a change occurs.




          Updating Paged Data: If you have more granular update signals, such as a network API signaling an update to a single item in the list, it's recommended to load data from network into memory. Then present that data to the PagedList via a DataSource that wraps an in-memory snapshot. Each time the in-memory copy changes, invalidate the previous DataSource, and a new one wrapping the new state of the snapshot can be created.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource




          With that in mind, I believe it's possible to solve the problem you described using a couple of steps.



          This may not be the cleanest way, as it involves 2 steps.



          You can get a reference the the snapshot that the PagedList is holding, which is a type MutableList. Then, you can just remove or update the item inside that snapshot, without invalidating the data source.



          Then step two would be to calling something like notifyItemRemoved(index) or notifyItemChanged(index).



          Since you can't force the DataSource to notify the observers of the change, you'll have to do that manually.



          pagedList.snapshot().remove(index) // Removes item from the pagedList
          adapter.notifyItemRemoved(index) // Triggers recyclerview to redraw/rebind to account for the deleted item.



          There maybe a better solution found in your DataSource.Factory.
          According to the official docs, your DataSource.Factory should be the one to emit a new PagedList once the data is updated.




          Updating Paged Data: To page in data from a source that does provide updates, you can create a DataSource.Factory, where each DataSource created is invalidated when an update to the data set occurs that makes the current snapshot invalid. For example, when paging a query from the Database, and the table being queried inserts or removes items. You can also use a DataSource.Factory to provide multiple versions of network-paged lists. If reloading all content (e.g. in response to an action like swipe-to-refresh) is required to get a new version of data, you can connect an explicit refresh signal to call invalidate() on the current DataSource.




          Source: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/arch/paging/DataSource



          I haven't found a good solution for this second approach however.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 22 at 17:15

























          answered Nov 22 at 16:26









          Felipe Roriz

          1244




          1244











          • Upvoted for the detailed answer and for the effort
            – Ümañg ßürmån
            Nov 23 at 7:56










          • Thank you for this detailed answer, but this approach does not work. The snapshot returned may be of type MutableList, but does not actually implement the interface. Calling for example removeAt yields an UnsupportedOperationException. Also, the documentation states that snapshots are not meant for reflecting modification and are in fact also immutable. So thanks for the answer, but downvoting, because it's incorrect and may mislead other people.
            – rubengees
            Nov 23 at 20:57











          • Ah, I see. Then I the only other way I can think of is the second option mentioned above, and utilizing the DataSource.Factory.
            – Felipe Roriz
            Nov 24 at 2:49










          • Yes, that seems the way to go. I have not yet found a way of implementing that and tried to get help on that with this question.
            – rubengees
            Nov 25 at 0:21
















          • Upvoted for the detailed answer and for the effort
            – Ümañg ßürmån
            Nov 23 at 7:56










          • Thank you for this detailed answer, but this approach does not work. The snapshot returned may be of type MutableList, but does not actually implement the interface. Calling for example removeAt yields an UnsupportedOperationException. Also, the documentation states that snapshots are not meant for reflecting modification and are in fact also immutable. So thanks for the answer, but downvoting, because it's incorrect and may mislead other people.
            – rubengees
            Nov 23 at 20:57











          • Ah, I see. Then I the only other way I can think of is the second option mentioned above, and utilizing the DataSource.Factory.
            – Felipe Roriz
            Nov 24 at 2:49










          • Yes, that seems the way to go. I have not yet found a way of implementing that and tried to get help on that with this question.
            – rubengees
            Nov 25 at 0:21















          Upvoted for the detailed answer and for the effort
          – Ümañg ßürmån
          Nov 23 at 7:56




          Upvoted for the detailed answer and for the effort
          – Ümañg ßürmån
          Nov 23 at 7:56












          Thank you for this detailed answer, but this approach does not work. The snapshot returned may be of type MutableList, but does not actually implement the interface. Calling for example removeAt yields an UnsupportedOperationException. Also, the documentation states that snapshots are not meant for reflecting modification and are in fact also immutable. So thanks for the answer, but downvoting, because it's incorrect and may mislead other people.
          – rubengees
          Nov 23 at 20:57





          Thank you for this detailed answer, but this approach does not work. The snapshot returned may be of type MutableList, but does not actually implement the interface. Calling for example removeAt yields an UnsupportedOperationException. Also, the documentation states that snapshots are not meant for reflecting modification and are in fact also immutable. So thanks for the answer, but downvoting, because it's incorrect and may mislead other people.
          – rubengees
          Nov 23 at 20:57













          Ah, I see. Then I the only other way I can think of is the second option mentioned above, and utilizing the DataSource.Factory.
          – Felipe Roriz
          Nov 24 at 2:49




          Ah, I see. Then I the only other way I can think of is the second option mentioned above, and utilizing the DataSource.Factory.
          – Felipe Roriz
          Nov 24 at 2:49












          Yes, that seems the way to go. I have not yet found a way of implementing that and tried to get help on that with this question.
          – rubengees
          Nov 25 at 0:21




          Yes, that seems the way to go. I have not yet found a way of implementing that and tried to get help on that with this question.
          – rubengees
          Nov 25 at 0:21

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53243704%2fmodifying-pagedlist-in-android-paging-architecture-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64

          ReactJS Fetched API data displays live - need Data displayed static

          政党