Coding Help on Stata
I have an unbalanced panel data set that gives me information on how much banks lend in different areas. Geography id and bank id are numeric variables that were created using a Stata command like egen id=group(var)
.
The geography id goes from 1 to n and the bank id goes from 1 to k. To give you a more concrete idea of how my data look:
Geography ID (gid) | Bank ID (bid) | lending
-----------------------------------------------
1 | 1 | 25
1 | 2 | 32
1 | 4 | 83
----------------------------------------------
2 | 1 | 76
2 | 3 | 22
---------------------------------------------
3 | 2 | 42
3 | 3 | 12
3 | 5 | 22
--------------------------------------------
My final goal is to create a dataframe that has all the pairwise combinations of the geographical areas such that:
1 2 3 ......... n
-------------------------------
1|(1,1) (1,2) (1,3)......(1,n)
2|(2,1) (2,2) (2,3)......(2,n)
.| . . .
n|(n,1) . ......(n,n)
Such that entry (i,j)
gives me:
(i,j)=(Lending from Banks Operating in Area i and j)/(Total Lending in Area i and j)
So for instance given the above data
(1,1)=1 (1,2)=(25+76)/(25+32+83+76+22) (1,3)=(32+42)/(25+32+83+42+12+22)
I have a feeling that as a first step I should use levelsof
and bysort
in a loop but I am unsure on how exactly to tackle the problem.
Even if you can't provide an exact solution I would be extremely grateful receiving any help or suggestion. Although I prefer Stata I also have some knowledge of Matlab/R, so if you think it would be more suitable for that problem I am open to suggestions.
r matlab stata
add a comment |
I have an unbalanced panel data set that gives me information on how much banks lend in different areas. Geography id and bank id are numeric variables that were created using a Stata command like egen id=group(var)
.
The geography id goes from 1 to n and the bank id goes from 1 to k. To give you a more concrete idea of how my data look:
Geography ID (gid) | Bank ID (bid) | lending
-----------------------------------------------
1 | 1 | 25
1 | 2 | 32
1 | 4 | 83
----------------------------------------------
2 | 1 | 76
2 | 3 | 22
---------------------------------------------
3 | 2 | 42
3 | 3 | 12
3 | 5 | 22
--------------------------------------------
My final goal is to create a dataframe that has all the pairwise combinations of the geographical areas such that:
1 2 3 ......... n
-------------------------------
1|(1,1) (1,2) (1,3)......(1,n)
2|(2,1) (2,2) (2,3)......(2,n)
.| . . .
n|(n,1) . ......(n,n)
Such that entry (i,j)
gives me:
(i,j)=(Lending from Banks Operating in Area i and j)/(Total Lending in Area i and j)
So for instance given the above data
(1,1)=1 (1,2)=(25+76)/(25+32+83+76+22) (1,3)=(32+42)/(25+32+83+42+12+22)
I have a feeling that as a first step I should use levelsof
and bysort
in a loop but I am unsure on how exactly to tackle the problem.
Even if you can't provide an exact solution I would be extremely grateful receiving any help or suggestion. Although I prefer Stata I also have some knowledge of Matlab/R, so if you think it would be more suitable for that problem I am open to suggestions.
r matlab stata
In R that could be accomplished withxtabs( Lending ~ Geograph_ID + Bank_ID, data=dat)
. Or possible something with tapply if there are multiple entries in any given cell (which is not presented in the data schema you displayed.) It would be an N x K matrix, not an N x N one. It's not clear how there could be different total in an i-j combo than a single item in that same combo.
– 42-
Nov 15 '18 at 0:09
Thank you for your answer. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but it should be N x N, since I want all the pairwise combinations of N different areas and not the pairwise combinations of Area-Bank (which would be N x K) .
– nda
Nov 15 '18 at 0:16
add a comment |
I have an unbalanced panel data set that gives me information on how much banks lend in different areas. Geography id and bank id are numeric variables that were created using a Stata command like egen id=group(var)
.
The geography id goes from 1 to n and the bank id goes from 1 to k. To give you a more concrete idea of how my data look:
Geography ID (gid) | Bank ID (bid) | lending
-----------------------------------------------
1 | 1 | 25
1 | 2 | 32
1 | 4 | 83
----------------------------------------------
2 | 1 | 76
2 | 3 | 22
---------------------------------------------
3 | 2 | 42
3 | 3 | 12
3 | 5 | 22
--------------------------------------------
My final goal is to create a dataframe that has all the pairwise combinations of the geographical areas such that:
1 2 3 ......... n
-------------------------------
1|(1,1) (1,2) (1,3)......(1,n)
2|(2,1) (2,2) (2,3)......(2,n)
.| . . .
n|(n,1) . ......(n,n)
Such that entry (i,j)
gives me:
(i,j)=(Lending from Banks Operating in Area i and j)/(Total Lending in Area i and j)
So for instance given the above data
(1,1)=1 (1,2)=(25+76)/(25+32+83+76+22) (1,3)=(32+42)/(25+32+83+42+12+22)
I have a feeling that as a first step I should use levelsof
and bysort
in a loop but I am unsure on how exactly to tackle the problem.
Even if you can't provide an exact solution I would be extremely grateful receiving any help or suggestion. Although I prefer Stata I also have some knowledge of Matlab/R, so if you think it would be more suitable for that problem I am open to suggestions.
r matlab stata
I have an unbalanced panel data set that gives me information on how much banks lend in different areas. Geography id and bank id are numeric variables that were created using a Stata command like egen id=group(var)
.
The geography id goes from 1 to n and the bank id goes from 1 to k. To give you a more concrete idea of how my data look:
Geography ID (gid) | Bank ID (bid) | lending
-----------------------------------------------
1 | 1 | 25
1 | 2 | 32
1 | 4 | 83
----------------------------------------------
2 | 1 | 76
2 | 3 | 22
---------------------------------------------
3 | 2 | 42
3 | 3 | 12
3 | 5 | 22
--------------------------------------------
My final goal is to create a dataframe that has all the pairwise combinations of the geographical areas such that:
1 2 3 ......... n
-------------------------------
1|(1,1) (1,2) (1,3)......(1,n)
2|(2,1) (2,2) (2,3)......(2,n)
.| . . .
n|(n,1) . ......(n,n)
Such that entry (i,j)
gives me:
(i,j)=(Lending from Banks Operating in Area i and j)/(Total Lending in Area i and j)
So for instance given the above data
(1,1)=1 (1,2)=(25+76)/(25+32+83+76+22) (1,3)=(32+42)/(25+32+83+42+12+22)
I have a feeling that as a first step I should use levelsof
and bysort
in a loop but I am unsure on how exactly to tackle the problem.
Even if you can't provide an exact solution I would be extremely grateful receiving any help or suggestion. Although I prefer Stata I also have some knowledge of Matlab/R, so if you think it would be more suitable for that problem I am open to suggestions.
r matlab stata
r matlab stata
edited Nov 15 '18 at 9:12
Nick Cox
25.1k42038
25.1k42038
asked Nov 14 '18 at 23:56
ndanda
82
82
In R that could be accomplished withxtabs( Lending ~ Geograph_ID + Bank_ID, data=dat)
. Or possible something with tapply if there are multiple entries in any given cell (which is not presented in the data schema you displayed.) It would be an N x K matrix, not an N x N one. It's not clear how there could be different total in an i-j combo than a single item in that same combo.
– 42-
Nov 15 '18 at 0:09
Thank you for your answer. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but it should be N x N, since I want all the pairwise combinations of N different areas and not the pairwise combinations of Area-Bank (which would be N x K) .
– nda
Nov 15 '18 at 0:16
add a comment |
In R that could be accomplished withxtabs( Lending ~ Geograph_ID + Bank_ID, data=dat)
. Or possible something with tapply if there are multiple entries in any given cell (which is not presented in the data schema you displayed.) It would be an N x K matrix, not an N x N one. It's not clear how there could be different total in an i-j combo than a single item in that same combo.
– 42-
Nov 15 '18 at 0:09
Thank you for your answer. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but it should be N x N, since I want all the pairwise combinations of N different areas and not the pairwise combinations of Area-Bank (which would be N x K) .
– nda
Nov 15 '18 at 0:16
In R that could be accomplished with
xtabs( Lending ~ Geograph_ID + Bank_ID, data=dat)
. Or possible something with tapply if there are multiple entries in any given cell (which is not presented in the data schema you displayed.) It would be an N x K matrix, not an N x N one. It's not clear how there could be different total in an i-j combo than a single item in that same combo.– 42-
Nov 15 '18 at 0:09
In R that could be accomplished with
xtabs( Lending ~ Geograph_ID + Bank_ID, data=dat)
. Or possible something with tapply if there are multiple entries in any given cell (which is not presented in the data schema you displayed.) It would be an N x K matrix, not an N x N one. It's not clear how there could be different total in an i-j combo than a single item in that same combo.– 42-
Nov 15 '18 at 0:09
Thank you for your answer. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but it should be N x N, since I want all the pairwise combinations of N different areas and not the pairwise combinations of Area-Bank (which would be N x K) .
– nda
Nov 15 '18 at 0:16
Thank you for your answer. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but it should be N x N, since I want all the pairwise combinations of N different areas and not the pairwise combinations of Area-Bank (which would be N x K) .
– nda
Nov 15 '18 at 0:16
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Here's an R method:
x <- data.frame(
geoid = c(1,1,1, 2,2, 3,3,3),
bankid = c(1,2,4, 1,3, 2,3,5),
lending = c(25,32,83, 76,22, 42,12,22)
)
myfunc <- function(x, i, j)
geos <- x$geoid %in% c(i, j)
banks <- with(x, intersect(bankid[geoid == i], bankid[geoid == j]))
with(x, sum(lending[geos & bankid %in% banks]) / sum(lending[geos]))
outer(unique(x$geoid), unique(x$geoid),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, list(x), i, j))
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] 1.0000000 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 1.0000000 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 1.0000000
It's not the most efficient, but it's a start. It's difficult (I think) to do this truly vectorized, since each subset requires intersections, though I'm sure this could be optimized to not require re-calculating intersect(bankid...)
twice for each equivalent pair (if that's a performance factor).
Edit: slightly more efficient process that does not re-calculate equivalent pairs of geoid
:
Split the data by geo:
geox <- split(x, x$geoid)
myfunc <- function(i, j)
if (i >= j) return(NA)
banks <- intersect(geox[[i]]$bankid, geox[[j]]$bankid)
sum(with(geox[[i]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ]),
with(geox[[j]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ])) /
sum(geox[[i]]$lending, geox[[j]]$lending)
o <- outer(seq_along(geox), seq_along(geox),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, i, j))
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] NA NA 0.1954023
# [3,] NA NA NA
(Just to prove we only calculated the minimum set.) Now, flip the upper triangle's data to lower triangle:
o[which(lower.tri(o),TRUE)] <- o[which(upper.tri(o),TRUE)]
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 NA 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 NA
And assign the known-value of 1 to the diagonal:
diag(o) <- 1
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53310540%2fcoding-help-on-stata%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here's an R method:
x <- data.frame(
geoid = c(1,1,1, 2,2, 3,3,3),
bankid = c(1,2,4, 1,3, 2,3,5),
lending = c(25,32,83, 76,22, 42,12,22)
)
myfunc <- function(x, i, j)
geos <- x$geoid %in% c(i, j)
banks <- with(x, intersect(bankid[geoid == i], bankid[geoid == j]))
with(x, sum(lending[geos & bankid %in% banks]) / sum(lending[geos]))
outer(unique(x$geoid), unique(x$geoid),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, list(x), i, j))
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] 1.0000000 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 1.0000000 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 1.0000000
It's not the most efficient, but it's a start. It's difficult (I think) to do this truly vectorized, since each subset requires intersections, though I'm sure this could be optimized to not require re-calculating intersect(bankid...)
twice for each equivalent pair (if that's a performance factor).
Edit: slightly more efficient process that does not re-calculate equivalent pairs of geoid
:
Split the data by geo:
geox <- split(x, x$geoid)
myfunc <- function(i, j)
if (i >= j) return(NA)
banks <- intersect(geox[[i]]$bankid, geox[[j]]$bankid)
sum(with(geox[[i]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ]),
with(geox[[j]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ])) /
sum(geox[[i]]$lending, geox[[j]]$lending)
o <- outer(seq_along(geox), seq_along(geox),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, i, j))
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] NA NA 0.1954023
# [3,] NA NA NA
(Just to prove we only calculated the minimum set.) Now, flip the upper triangle's data to lower triangle:
o[which(lower.tri(o),TRUE)] <- o[which(upper.tri(o),TRUE)]
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 NA 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 NA
And assign the known-value of 1 to the diagonal:
diag(o) <- 1
add a comment |
Here's an R method:
x <- data.frame(
geoid = c(1,1,1, 2,2, 3,3,3),
bankid = c(1,2,4, 1,3, 2,3,5),
lending = c(25,32,83, 76,22, 42,12,22)
)
myfunc <- function(x, i, j)
geos <- x$geoid %in% c(i, j)
banks <- with(x, intersect(bankid[geoid == i], bankid[geoid == j]))
with(x, sum(lending[geos & bankid %in% banks]) / sum(lending[geos]))
outer(unique(x$geoid), unique(x$geoid),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, list(x), i, j))
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] 1.0000000 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 1.0000000 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 1.0000000
It's not the most efficient, but it's a start. It's difficult (I think) to do this truly vectorized, since each subset requires intersections, though I'm sure this could be optimized to not require re-calculating intersect(bankid...)
twice for each equivalent pair (if that's a performance factor).
Edit: slightly more efficient process that does not re-calculate equivalent pairs of geoid
:
Split the data by geo:
geox <- split(x, x$geoid)
myfunc <- function(i, j)
if (i >= j) return(NA)
banks <- intersect(geox[[i]]$bankid, geox[[j]]$bankid)
sum(with(geox[[i]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ]),
with(geox[[j]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ])) /
sum(geox[[i]]$lending, geox[[j]]$lending)
o <- outer(seq_along(geox), seq_along(geox),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, i, j))
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] NA NA 0.1954023
# [3,] NA NA NA
(Just to prove we only calculated the minimum set.) Now, flip the upper triangle's data to lower triangle:
o[which(lower.tri(o),TRUE)] <- o[which(upper.tri(o),TRUE)]
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 NA 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 NA
And assign the known-value of 1 to the diagonal:
diag(o) <- 1
add a comment |
Here's an R method:
x <- data.frame(
geoid = c(1,1,1, 2,2, 3,3,3),
bankid = c(1,2,4, 1,3, 2,3,5),
lending = c(25,32,83, 76,22, 42,12,22)
)
myfunc <- function(x, i, j)
geos <- x$geoid %in% c(i, j)
banks <- with(x, intersect(bankid[geoid == i], bankid[geoid == j]))
with(x, sum(lending[geos & bankid %in% banks]) / sum(lending[geos]))
outer(unique(x$geoid), unique(x$geoid),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, list(x), i, j))
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] 1.0000000 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 1.0000000 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 1.0000000
It's not the most efficient, but it's a start. It's difficult (I think) to do this truly vectorized, since each subset requires intersections, though I'm sure this could be optimized to not require re-calculating intersect(bankid...)
twice for each equivalent pair (if that's a performance factor).
Edit: slightly more efficient process that does not re-calculate equivalent pairs of geoid
:
Split the data by geo:
geox <- split(x, x$geoid)
myfunc <- function(i, j)
if (i >= j) return(NA)
banks <- intersect(geox[[i]]$bankid, geox[[j]]$bankid)
sum(with(geox[[i]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ]),
with(geox[[j]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ])) /
sum(geox[[i]]$lending, geox[[j]]$lending)
o <- outer(seq_along(geox), seq_along(geox),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, i, j))
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] NA NA 0.1954023
# [3,] NA NA NA
(Just to prove we only calculated the minimum set.) Now, flip the upper triangle's data to lower triangle:
o[which(lower.tri(o),TRUE)] <- o[which(upper.tri(o),TRUE)]
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 NA 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 NA
And assign the known-value of 1 to the diagonal:
diag(o) <- 1
Here's an R method:
x <- data.frame(
geoid = c(1,1,1, 2,2, 3,3,3),
bankid = c(1,2,4, 1,3, 2,3,5),
lending = c(25,32,83, 76,22, 42,12,22)
)
myfunc <- function(x, i, j)
geos <- x$geoid %in% c(i, j)
banks <- with(x, intersect(bankid[geoid == i], bankid[geoid == j]))
with(x, sum(lending[geos & bankid %in% banks]) / sum(lending[geos]))
outer(unique(x$geoid), unique(x$geoid),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, list(x), i, j))
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] 1.0000000 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 1.0000000 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 1.0000000
It's not the most efficient, but it's a start. It's difficult (I think) to do this truly vectorized, since each subset requires intersections, though I'm sure this could be optimized to not require re-calculating intersect(bankid...)
twice for each equivalent pair (if that's a performance factor).
Edit: slightly more efficient process that does not re-calculate equivalent pairs of geoid
:
Split the data by geo:
geox <- split(x, x$geoid)
myfunc <- function(i, j)
if (i >= j) return(NA)
banks <- intersect(geox[[i]]$bankid, geox[[j]]$bankid)
sum(with(geox[[i]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ]),
with(geox[[j]], lending[ bankid %in% banks ])) /
sum(geox[[i]]$lending, geox[[j]]$lending)
o <- outer(seq_along(geox), seq_along(geox),
function(i,j) mapply(myfunc, i, j))
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] NA NA 0.1954023
# [3,] NA NA NA
(Just to prove we only calculated the minimum set.) Now, flip the upper triangle's data to lower triangle:
o[which(lower.tri(o),TRUE)] <- o[which(upper.tri(o),TRUE)]
o
# [,1] [,2] [,3]
# [1,] NA 0.4243697 0.3425926
# [2,] 0.4243697 NA 0.1954023
# [3,] 0.3425926 0.1954023 NA
And assign the known-value of 1 to the diagonal:
diag(o) <- 1
edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:46
answered Nov 15 '18 at 0:14
r2evansr2evans
27.1k33058
27.1k33058
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53310540%2fcoding-help-on-stata%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
In R that could be accomplished with
xtabs( Lending ~ Geograph_ID + Bank_ID, data=dat)
. Or possible something with tapply if there are multiple entries in any given cell (which is not presented in the data schema you displayed.) It would be an N x K matrix, not an N x N one. It's not clear how there could be different total in an i-j combo than a single item in that same combo.– 42-
Nov 15 '18 at 0:09
Thank you for your answer. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but it should be N x N, since I want all the pairwise combinations of N different areas and not the pairwise combinations of Area-Bank (which would be N x K) .
– nda
Nov 15 '18 at 0:16