Mock Data using MOQ Framework without Interface in N units










1















I want to test the communication between some methods using mock. The only problem is that I want to do it without implementing an interface. Is that possible? I just read a lot of topics and some tutorials about mock objects, but all of them used to mock interfaces, and not the classes. I tried to use Moq frameworks.










share|improve this question






















  • Good question, but already asked and answered several times. For example here: stackoverflow.com/questions/12174304/…

    – johey
    Nov 16 '18 at 8:08















1















I want to test the communication between some methods using mock. The only problem is that I want to do it without implementing an interface. Is that possible? I just read a lot of topics and some tutorials about mock objects, but all of them used to mock interfaces, and not the classes. I tried to use Moq frameworks.










share|improve this question






















  • Good question, but already asked and answered several times. For example here: stackoverflow.com/questions/12174304/…

    – johey
    Nov 16 '18 at 8:08













1












1








1








I want to test the communication between some methods using mock. The only problem is that I want to do it without implementing an interface. Is that possible? I just read a lot of topics and some tutorials about mock objects, but all of them used to mock interfaces, and not the classes. I tried to use Moq frameworks.










share|improve this question














I want to test the communication between some methods using mock. The only problem is that I want to do it without implementing an interface. Is that possible? I just read a lot of topics and some tutorials about mock objects, but all of them used to mock interfaces, and not the classes. I tried to use Moq frameworks.







.net






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 16 '18 at 7:17









Sai shankarSai shankar

61




61












  • Good question, but already asked and answered several times. For example here: stackoverflow.com/questions/12174304/…

    – johey
    Nov 16 '18 at 8:08

















  • Good question, but already asked and answered several times. For example here: stackoverflow.com/questions/12174304/…

    – johey
    Nov 16 '18 at 8:08
















Good question, but already asked and answered several times. For example here: stackoverflow.com/questions/12174304/…

– johey
Nov 16 '18 at 8:08





Good question, but already asked and answered several times. For example here: stackoverflow.com/questions/12174304/…

– johey
Nov 16 '18 at 8:08












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I have to less reputations for a comment. Please check out the SOLID principle. You should really use interfaces.
If you really don´t want to use interfaces just make your methods or properties virtual and moq is able to override it with the setup.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53333125%2fmock-data-using-moq-framework-without-interface-in-n-units%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I have to less reputations for a comment. Please check out the SOLID principle. You should really use interfaces.
    If you really don´t want to use interfaces just make your methods or properties virtual and moq is able to override it with the setup.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      I have to less reputations for a comment. Please check out the SOLID principle. You should really use interfaces.
      If you really don´t want to use interfaces just make your methods or properties virtual and moq is able to override it with the setup.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        I have to less reputations for a comment. Please check out the SOLID principle. You should really use interfaces.
        If you really don´t want to use interfaces just make your methods or properties virtual and moq is able to override it with the setup.






        share|improve this answer













        I have to less reputations for a comment. Please check out the SOLID principle. You should really use interfaces.
        If you really don´t want to use interfaces just make your methods or properties virtual and moq is able to override it with the setup.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 16 '18 at 17:28









        RichyP7RichyP7

        315




        315





























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53333125%2fmock-data-using-moq-framework-without-interface-in-n-units%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64

            ReactJS Fetched API data displays live - need Data displayed static

            Evgeni Malkin