Passing number of parameters vs passing map, which is better while writing a method?
0
While writing a method, what is better calling a method with number of parameters or creating a Map and passing it as 1 parameter.
java java-ee collections hashmap
asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:16
HarsH1610
2993722
add a comment |
0
While writing a method, what is better calling a method with number of parameters or creating a Map and passing it as 1 parameter.
java java-ee collections hashmap
asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:16
HarsH1610
2993722
add a comment |
0
0
0
While writing a method, what is better calling a method with number of parameters or creating a Map and passing it as 1 parameter.
java java-ee collections hashmap
asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:16
HarsH1610
2993722
While writing a method, what is better calling a method with number of parameters or creating a Map and passing it as 1 parameter.
java java-ee collections hashmap
java java-ee collections hashmap
asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:16
HarsH1610
2993722
asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:16
HarsH1610
2993722
asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:16
HarsH1610
2993722
asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:16
HarsH1610
2993722
asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:16
HarsH1610
2993722
2993722
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
3
You may also consider using an argument class with a builder.
myMethod(MyArgument.newBuilder().withFirstArg("arg1").build());
- It is long and tedious
- You are safe against maps having misspelt keys
- You can mandatory and optional parameters
- Your method is cleaner as it accesses methods directly instead of having to check if the map containsKey
Alternatively, you could try using the fluent interface.
myMethod("arg1").invokeWith("arg2").anotherOne("arg3").andOneMore("arg4").andTheLastOne("arg5");
answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:12
sid
588
add a comment |
0
If your method requires
- dynamic number of arguments (e.g. which are based on the user input), then a Map is a good solution
- fixed number of arguments and there are many of them (e.g. more than 5) then probably it means it does too much and should be split into a few methods
answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:23
Adam Siemion
11.7k13368
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53270889%2fpassing-number-of-parameters-vs-passing-map-which-is-better-while-writing-a-met%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
3
You may also consider using an argument class with a builder.
myMethod(MyArgument.newBuilder().withFirstArg("arg1").build());
- It is long and tedious
- You are safe against maps having misspelt keys
- You can mandatory and optional parameters
- Your method is cleaner as it accesses methods directly instead of having to check if the map containsKey
Alternatively, you could try using the fluent interface.
myMethod("arg1").invokeWith("arg2").anotherOne("arg3").andOneMore("arg4").andTheLastOne("arg5");
answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:12
sid
588
add a comment |
3
You may also consider using an argument class with a builder.
myMethod(MyArgument.newBuilder().withFirstArg("arg1").build());
- It is long and tedious
- You are safe against maps having misspelt keys
- You can mandatory and optional parameters
- Your method is cleaner as it accesses methods directly instead of having to check if the map containsKey
Alternatively, you could try using the fluent interface.
myMethod("arg1").invokeWith("arg2").anotherOne("arg3").andOneMore("arg4").andTheLastOne("arg5");
answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:12
sid
588
add a comment |
3
3
3
You may also consider using an argument class with a builder.
myMethod(MyArgument.newBuilder().withFirstArg("arg1").build());
- It is long and tedious
- You are safe against maps having misspelt keys
- You can mandatory and optional parameters
- Your method is cleaner as it accesses methods directly instead of having to check if the map containsKey
Alternatively, you could try using the fluent interface.
myMethod("arg1").invokeWith("arg2").anotherOne("arg3").andOneMore("arg4").andTheLastOne("arg5");
answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:12
sid
588
You may also consider using an argument class with a builder.
myMethod(MyArgument.newBuilder().withFirstArg("arg1").build());
- It is long and tedious
- You are safe against maps having misspelt keys
- You can mandatory and optional parameters
- Your method is cleaner as it accesses methods directly instead of having to check if the map containsKey
Alternatively, you could try using the fluent interface.
myMethod("arg1").invokeWith("arg2").anotherOne("arg3").andOneMore("arg4").andTheLastOne("arg5");
answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:12
sid
588
answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:12
sid
588
answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:12
sid
588
answered Nov 12 '18 at 23:12
sid
588
588
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
If your method requires
- dynamic number of arguments (e.g. which are based on the user input), then a Map is a good solution
- fixed number of arguments and there are many of them (e.g. more than 5) then probably it means it does too much and should be split into a few methods
answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:23
Adam Siemion
11.7k13368
add a comment |
0
If your method requires
- dynamic number of arguments (e.g. which are based on the user input), then a Map is a good solution
- fixed number of arguments and there are many of them (e.g. more than 5) then probably it means it does too much and should be split into a few methods
answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:23
Adam Siemion
11.7k13368
add a comment |
0
0
0
If your method requires
- dynamic number of arguments (e.g. which are based on the user input), then a Map is a good solution
- fixed number of arguments and there are many of them (e.g. more than 5) then probably it means it does too much and should be split into a few methods
answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:23
Adam Siemion
11.7k13368
If your method requires
- dynamic number of arguments (e.g. which are based on the user input), then a Map is a good solution
- fixed number of arguments and there are many of them (e.g. more than 5) then probably it means it does too much and should be split into a few methods
answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:23
Adam Siemion
11.7k13368
answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:23
Adam Siemion
11.7k13368
answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:23
Adam Siemion
11.7k13368
answered Nov 12 '18 at 22:23
Adam Siemion
11.7k13368
11.7k13368
add a comment |
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53270889%2fpassing-number-of-parameters-vs-passing-map-which-is-better-while-writing-a-met%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
