Archiving part of Nexus repository










-1














We have old releases taking up needed disk space in Nexus. We very likely won't use these releases again but need to keep them for compliance reasons.



I would like to be able to move away some artefacts to a larger, slower storage location without:



1) confusing Nexus in any way (e.g. internal state, any metadata/DB etc.).
2) losing the ability to restore them later.



I don't think the existing Nexus clean-up tasks will achieve this, nor any of the ad-hoc deletion scripts I've seen (which seem to predate the tasks and/or deal with shortcomings).



Is there a good way to achieve this?



We are using Sonatype Nexus 2.11.3-01.










share|improve this question




























    -1














    We have old releases taking up needed disk space in Nexus. We very likely won't use these releases again but need to keep them for compliance reasons.



    I would like to be able to move away some artefacts to a larger, slower storage location without:



    1) confusing Nexus in any way (e.g. internal state, any metadata/DB etc.).
    2) losing the ability to restore them later.



    I don't think the existing Nexus clean-up tasks will achieve this, nor any of the ad-hoc deletion scripts I've seen (which seem to predate the tasks and/or deal with shortcomings).



    Is there a good way to achieve this?



    We are using Sonatype Nexus 2.11.3-01.










    share|improve this question


























      -1












      -1








      -1







      We have old releases taking up needed disk space in Nexus. We very likely won't use these releases again but need to keep them for compliance reasons.



      I would like to be able to move away some artefacts to a larger, slower storage location without:



      1) confusing Nexus in any way (e.g. internal state, any metadata/DB etc.).
      2) losing the ability to restore them later.



      I don't think the existing Nexus clean-up tasks will achieve this, nor any of the ad-hoc deletion scripts I've seen (which seem to predate the tasks and/or deal with shortcomings).



      Is there a good way to achieve this?



      We are using Sonatype Nexus 2.11.3-01.










      share|improve this question















      We have old releases taking up needed disk space in Nexus. We very likely won't use these releases again but need to keep them for compliance reasons.



      I would like to be able to move away some artefacts to a larger, slower storage location without:



      1) confusing Nexus in any way (e.g. internal state, any metadata/DB etc.).
      2) losing the ability to restore them later.



      I don't think the existing Nexus clean-up tasks will achieve this, nor any of the ad-hoc deletion scripts I've seen (which seem to predate the tasks and/or deal with shortcomings).



      Is there a good way to achieve this?



      We are using Sonatype Nexus 2.11.3-01.







      nexus






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 12 at 15:45

























      asked Nov 12 at 14:17









      Sam Brightman

      1,35331926




      1,35331926






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          I can think of two possible solutions:



          1) Since NXRM2 is on a file system, you should be able to write some sort of script to look at artifact age and then copy the artifacts away. Then you could use the built in cleanup as normal.



          2) While I haven't tried this/may be dangerous, if the scheduled tasks meet your needs for FINDING items but not for saving them, you could empty trash, run the tasks and then everything in the trash folder should be what you want to save. Definitely make sure you don't have an auto delete trash or any other trash in there if going with this option.



          Neither of these are built in, so are kind of hacking around but I think they'd work (without trying).






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53264066%2farchiving-part-of-nexus-repository%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            I can think of two possible solutions:



            1) Since NXRM2 is on a file system, you should be able to write some sort of script to look at artifact age and then copy the artifacts away. Then you could use the built in cleanup as normal.



            2) While I haven't tried this/may be dangerous, if the scheduled tasks meet your needs for FINDING items but not for saving them, you could empty trash, run the tasks and then everything in the trash folder should be what you want to save. Definitely make sure you don't have an auto delete trash or any other trash in there if going with this option.



            Neither of these are built in, so are kind of hacking around but I think they'd work (without trying).






            share|improve this answer

























              0














              I can think of two possible solutions:



              1) Since NXRM2 is on a file system, you should be able to write some sort of script to look at artifact age and then copy the artifacts away. Then you could use the built in cleanup as normal.



              2) While I haven't tried this/may be dangerous, if the scheduled tasks meet your needs for FINDING items but not for saving them, you could empty trash, run the tasks and then everything in the trash folder should be what you want to save. Definitely make sure you don't have an auto delete trash or any other trash in there if going with this option.



              Neither of these are built in, so are kind of hacking around but I think they'd work (without trying).






              share|improve this answer























                0












                0








                0






                I can think of two possible solutions:



                1) Since NXRM2 is on a file system, you should be able to write some sort of script to look at artifact age and then copy the artifacts away. Then you could use the built in cleanup as normal.



                2) While I haven't tried this/may be dangerous, if the scheduled tasks meet your needs for FINDING items but not for saving them, you could empty trash, run the tasks and then everything in the trash folder should be what you want to save. Definitely make sure you don't have an auto delete trash or any other trash in there if going with this option.



                Neither of these are built in, so are kind of hacking around but I think they'd work (without trying).






                share|improve this answer












                I can think of two possible solutions:



                1) Since NXRM2 is on a file system, you should be able to write some sort of script to look at artifact age and then copy the artifacts away. Then you could use the built in cleanup as normal.



                2) While I haven't tried this/may be dangerous, if the scheduled tasks meet your needs for FINDING items but not for saving them, you could empty trash, run the tasks and then everything in the trash folder should be what you want to save. Definitely make sure you don't have an auto delete trash or any other trash in there if going with this option.



                Neither of these are built in, so are kind of hacking around but I think they'd work (without trying).







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 28 at 23:32









                joedragons

                590713




                590713



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53264066%2farchiving-part-of-nexus-repository%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64

                    政党

                    天津地下鉄3号線