Large amount of lists concatenation [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
Merge lists that share common elements
13 answers
I'm trying to make a function which concatenate multiple list if one element is the same in 2 or more different list.
Example :
[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
would become [[1,2],[0,3,4,5]
[[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
would become [[0,1,2]]
[[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
would become [[1,2,3,4]]
In fact we just regroup the list if they have a common element and we delete one of the two element. The finals lists must have unique elements.
I tried to make the following function. It works, but when using big list (around 100 or 200 lists of list), I got the following recursion error : RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of an object
def concat(L):
break_cond = False
print(L)
for L1 in L:
for L2 in L:
if (bool(set(L1) & set(L2)) and L1 != L2):
break_cond = True
if (break_cond):
i, j = 0, 0
while i < len(L):
while j < len(L):
if (bool(set(L[i]) & set(L[j])) and i != j):
L[i] = sorted(L[i] + list(set(L[j]) - set(L[i])))
L.pop(j)
j += 1
i += 1
return concat(L)
Moreover, I would like to do it using only basic python and not that much library. Any idea ? Thanks
Example of list where I get the error :
[[0, 64], [1, 120, 172], [2, 130], [3, 81, 102], [5, 126], [6, 176], [7, 21, 94], [8, 111, 167], [9, 53, 60, 138], [10, 102, 179], [11, 45, 72], [12, 53, 129], [14, 35, 40, 58, 188], [15, 86], [18, 70, 94], [19, 28], [20, 152], [21, 24], [22, 143, 154], [23, 110, 171], [24, 102, 144], [25, 73, 106, 187], [26, 189], [28, 114, 137], [29, 148], [30, 39], [31, 159], [33, 44, 132, 139], [34, 81, 100, 136, 185], [35, 53], [37, 61, 138], [38, 144, 147, 165], [41, 42, 174], [42, 74, 107, 162], [43, 99, 123], [44, 71, 122, 126], [45, 74, 144], [47, 94, 151], [48, 114, 133], [49, 130, 144], [50, 51], [51, 187], [52, 124, 142, 146, 167, 184], [54, 97], [55, 94], [56, 88, 128, 166], [57, 63, 80], [59, 89], [60, 106, 134, 142], [61, 128, 145], [62, 70], [63, 73, 76, 101, 106], [64, 80, 176], [65, 187, 198], [66, 111, 131, 150], [67, 97, 128, 159], [68, 85, 128], [69, 85, 169], [70, 182], [71, 123], [72, 85, 94], [73, 112, 161], [74, 93, 124, 151, 191], [75, 163], [76, 99, 106, 129, 138, 152, 179], [77, 89, 92], [78, 146, 156], [79, 182], [82, 87, 130, 179], [83, 148], [84, 110, 146], [85, 98, 137, 177], [86, 198], [87, 101], [88, 134, 149], [89, 99, 107, 130, 193], [93, 147], [95, 193], [96, 98, 109], [104, 105], [106, 115, 154, 167, 190], [107, 185, 193], [111, 144, 153], [112, 128, 188], [114, 136], [115, 146], [118, 195], [119, 152], [121, 182], [124, 129, 177], [125, 156], [126, 194], [127, 198], [128, 149], [129, 153], [130, 164, 196], [132, 140], [133, 181], [135, 165, 170, 171], [136, 145], [141, 162], [142, 170, 187], [147, 171], [148, 173], [150, 180], [153, 191], [154, 196], [156, 165], [157, 177], [158, 159], [159, 172], [161, 166], [162, 192], [164, 184, 197], [172, 199], [186, 197], [187, 192]]
python
marked as duplicate by River, tink, Matthieu Brucher, Makyen, eyllanesc
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |Â
This question already has an answer here:
Merge lists that share common elements
13 answers
I'm trying to make a function which concatenate multiple list if one element is the same in 2 or more different list.
Example :
[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
would become [[1,2],[0,3,4,5]
[[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
would become [[0,1,2]]
[[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
would become [[1,2,3,4]]
In fact we just regroup the list if they have a common element and we delete one of the two element. The finals lists must have unique elements.
I tried to make the following function. It works, but when using big list (around 100 or 200 lists of list), I got the following recursion error : RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of an object
def concat(L):
break_cond = False
print(L)
for L1 in L:
for L2 in L:
if (bool(set(L1) & set(L2)) and L1 != L2):
break_cond = True
if (break_cond):
i, j = 0, 0
while i < len(L):
while j < len(L):
if (bool(set(L[i]) & set(L[j])) and i != j):
L[i] = sorted(L[i] + list(set(L[j]) - set(L[i])))
L.pop(j)
j += 1
i += 1
return concat(L)
Moreover, I would like to do it using only basic python and not that much library. Any idea ? Thanks
Example of list where I get the error :
[[0, 64], [1, 120, 172], [2, 130], [3, 81, 102], [5, 126], [6, 176], [7, 21, 94], [8, 111, 167], [9, 53, 60, 138], [10, 102, 179], [11, 45, 72], [12, 53, 129], [14, 35, 40, 58, 188], [15, 86], [18, 70, 94], [19, 28], [20, 152], [21, 24], [22, 143, 154], [23, 110, 171], [24, 102, 144], [25, 73, 106, 187], [26, 189], [28, 114, 137], [29, 148], [30, 39], [31, 159], [33, 44, 132, 139], [34, 81, 100, 136, 185], [35, 53], [37, 61, 138], [38, 144, 147, 165], [41, 42, 174], [42, 74, 107, 162], [43, 99, 123], [44, 71, 122, 126], [45, 74, 144], [47, 94, 151], [48, 114, 133], [49, 130, 144], [50, 51], [51, 187], [52, 124, 142, 146, 167, 184], [54, 97], [55, 94], [56, 88, 128, 166], [57, 63, 80], [59, 89], [60, 106, 134, 142], [61, 128, 145], [62, 70], [63, 73, 76, 101, 106], [64, 80, 176], [65, 187, 198], [66, 111, 131, 150], [67, 97, 128, 159], [68, 85, 128], [69, 85, 169], [70, 182], [71, 123], [72, 85, 94], [73, 112, 161], [74, 93, 124, 151, 191], [75, 163], [76, 99, 106, 129, 138, 152, 179], [77, 89, 92], [78, 146, 156], [79, 182], [82, 87, 130, 179], [83, 148], [84, 110, 146], [85, 98, 137, 177], [86, 198], [87, 101], [88, 134, 149], [89, 99, 107, 130, 193], [93, 147], [95, 193], [96, 98, 109], [104, 105], [106, 115, 154, 167, 190], [107, 185, 193], [111, 144, 153], [112, 128, 188], [114, 136], [115, 146], [118, 195], [119, 152], [121, 182], [124, 129, 177], [125, 156], [126, 194], [127, 198], [128, 149], [129, 153], [130, 164, 196], [132, 140], [133, 181], [135, 165, 170, 171], [136, 145], [141, 162], [142, 170, 187], [147, 171], [148, 173], [150, 180], [153, 191], [154, 196], [156, 165], [157, 177], [158, 159], [159, 172], [161, 166], [162, 192], [164, 184, 197], [172, 199], [186, 197], [187, 192]]
python
marked as duplicate by River, tink, Matthieu Brucher, Makyen, eyllanesc
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
â Daniel Mesejo
2 days ago
@DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be[[1,2,3,4]]
â Kamloops
2 days ago
I don't get your code. Ifbreak_cond
is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?
â dyukha
2 days ago
1
What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
This question already has an answer here:
Merge lists that share common elements
13 answers
I'm trying to make a function which concatenate multiple list if one element is the same in 2 or more different list.
Example :
[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
would become [[1,2],[0,3,4,5]
[[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
would become [[0,1,2]]
[[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
would become [[1,2,3,4]]
In fact we just regroup the list if they have a common element and we delete one of the two element. The finals lists must have unique elements.
I tried to make the following function. It works, but when using big list (around 100 or 200 lists of list), I got the following recursion error : RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of an object
def concat(L):
break_cond = False
print(L)
for L1 in L:
for L2 in L:
if (bool(set(L1) & set(L2)) and L1 != L2):
break_cond = True
if (break_cond):
i, j = 0, 0
while i < len(L):
while j < len(L):
if (bool(set(L[i]) & set(L[j])) and i != j):
L[i] = sorted(L[i] + list(set(L[j]) - set(L[i])))
L.pop(j)
j += 1
i += 1
return concat(L)
Moreover, I would like to do it using only basic python and not that much library. Any idea ? Thanks
Example of list where I get the error :
[[0, 64], [1, 120, 172], [2, 130], [3, 81, 102], [5, 126], [6, 176], [7, 21, 94], [8, 111, 167], [9, 53, 60, 138], [10, 102, 179], [11, 45, 72], [12, 53, 129], [14, 35, 40, 58, 188], [15, 86], [18, 70, 94], [19, 28], [20, 152], [21, 24], [22, 143, 154], [23, 110, 171], [24, 102, 144], [25, 73, 106, 187], [26, 189], [28, 114, 137], [29, 148], [30, 39], [31, 159], [33, 44, 132, 139], [34, 81, 100, 136, 185], [35, 53], [37, 61, 138], [38, 144, 147, 165], [41, 42, 174], [42, 74, 107, 162], [43, 99, 123], [44, 71, 122, 126], [45, 74, 144], [47, 94, 151], [48, 114, 133], [49, 130, 144], [50, 51], [51, 187], [52, 124, 142, 146, 167, 184], [54, 97], [55, 94], [56, 88, 128, 166], [57, 63, 80], [59, 89], [60, 106, 134, 142], [61, 128, 145], [62, 70], [63, 73, 76, 101, 106], [64, 80, 176], [65, 187, 198], [66, 111, 131, 150], [67, 97, 128, 159], [68, 85, 128], [69, 85, 169], [70, 182], [71, 123], [72, 85, 94], [73, 112, 161], [74, 93, 124, 151, 191], [75, 163], [76, 99, 106, 129, 138, 152, 179], [77, 89, 92], [78, 146, 156], [79, 182], [82, 87, 130, 179], [83, 148], [84, 110, 146], [85, 98, 137, 177], [86, 198], [87, 101], [88, 134, 149], [89, 99, 107, 130, 193], [93, 147], [95, 193], [96, 98, 109], [104, 105], [106, 115, 154, 167, 190], [107, 185, 193], [111, 144, 153], [112, 128, 188], [114, 136], [115, 146], [118, 195], [119, 152], [121, 182], [124, 129, 177], [125, 156], [126, 194], [127, 198], [128, 149], [129, 153], [130, 164, 196], [132, 140], [133, 181], [135, 165, 170, 171], [136, 145], [141, 162], [142, 170, 187], [147, 171], [148, 173], [150, 180], [153, 191], [154, 196], [156, 165], [157, 177], [158, 159], [159, 172], [161, 166], [162, 192], [164, 184, 197], [172, 199], [186, 197], [187, 192]]
python
This question already has an answer here:
Merge lists that share common elements
13 answers
I'm trying to make a function which concatenate multiple list if one element is the same in 2 or more different list.
Example :
[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
would become [[1,2],[0,3,4,5]
[[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
would become [[0,1,2]]
[[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
would become [[1,2,3,4]]
In fact we just regroup the list if they have a common element and we delete one of the two element. The finals lists must have unique elements.
I tried to make the following function. It works, but when using big list (around 100 or 200 lists of list), I got the following recursion error : RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of an object
def concat(L):
break_cond = False
print(L)
for L1 in L:
for L2 in L:
if (bool(set(L1) & set(L2)) and L1 != L2):
break_cond = True
if (break_cond):
i, j = 0, 0
while i < len(L):
while j < len(L):
if (bool(set(L[i]) & set(L[j])) and i != j):
L[i] = sorted(L[i] + list(set(L[j]) - set(L[i])))
L.pop(j)
j += 1
i += 1
return concat(L)
Moreover, I would like to do it using only basic python and not that much library. Any idea ? Thanks
Example of list where I get the error :
[[0, 64], [1, 120, 172], [2, 130], [3, 81, 102], [5, 126], [6, 176], [7, 21, 94], [8, 111, 167], [9, 53, 60, 138], [10, 102, 179], [11, 45, 72], [12, 53, 129], [14, 35, 40, 58, 188], [15, 86], [18, 70, 94], [19, 28], [20, 152], [21, 24], [22, 143, 154], [23, 110, 171], [24, 102, 144], [25, 73, 106, 187], [26, 189], [28, 114, 137], [29, 148], [30, 39], [31, 159], [33, 44, 132, 139], [34, 81, 100, 136, 185], [35, 53], [37, 61, 138], [38, 144, 147, 165], [41, 42, 174], [42, 74, 107, 162], [43, 99, 123], [44, 71, 122, 126], [45, 74, 144], [47, 94, 151], [48, 114, 133], [49, 130, 144], [50, 51], [51, 187], [52, 124, 142, 146, 167, 184], [54, 97], [55, 94], [56, 88, 128, 166], [57, 63, 80], [59, 89], [60, 106, 134, 142], [61, 128, 145], [62, 70], [63, 73, 76, 101, 106], [64, 80, 176], [65, 187, 198], [66, 111, 131, 150], [67, 97, 128, 159], [68, 85, 128], [69, 85, 169], [70, 182], [71, 123], [72, 85, 94], [73, 112, 161], [74, 93, 124, 151, 191], [75, 163], [76, 99, 106, 129, 138, 152, 179], [77, 89, 92], [78, 146, 156], [79, 182], [82, 87, 130, 179], [83, 148], [84, 110, 146], [85, 98, 137, 177], [86, 198], [87, 101], [88, 134, 149], [89, 99, 107, 130, 193], [93, 147], [95, 193], [96, 98, 109], [104, 105], [106, 115, 154, 167, 190], [107, 185, 193], [111, 144, 153], [112, 128, 188], [114, 136], [115, 146], [118, 195], [119, 152], [121, 182], [124, 129, 177], [125, 156], [126, 194], [127, 198], [128, 149], [129, 153], [130, 164, 196], [132, 140], [133, 181], [135, 165, 170, 171], [136, 145], [141, 162], [142, 170, 187], [147, 171], [148, 173], [150, 180], [153, 191], [154, 196], [156, 165], [157, 177], [158, 159], [159, 172], [161, 166], [162, 192], [164, 184, 197], [172, 199], [186, 197], [187, 192]]
This question already has an answer here:
Merge lists that share common elements
13 answers
python
python
edited 2 days ago
asked 2 days ago
Kamloops
756
756
marked as duplicate by River, tink, Matthieu Brucher, Makyen, eyllanesc
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by River, tink, Matthieu Brucher, Makyen, eyllanesc
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
â Daniel Mesejo
2 days ago
@DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be[[1,2,3,4]]
â Kamloops
2 days ago
I don't get your code. Ifbreak_cond
is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?
â dyukha
2 days ago
1
What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
â Daniel Mesejo
2 days ago
@DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be[[1,2,3,4]]
â Kamloops
2 days ago
I don't get your code. Ifbreak_cond
is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?
â dyukha
2 days ago
1
What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
â Daniel Mesejo
2 days ago
What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
â Daniel Mesejo
2 days ago
@DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be
[[1,2,3,4]]
â Kamloops
2 days ago
@DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be
[[1,2,3,4]]
â Kamloops
2 days ago
I don't get your code. If
break_cond
is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?â dyukha
2 days ago
I don't get your code. If
break_cond
is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?â dyukha
2 days ago
1
1
What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:
from itertools import combinations
def bfs(graph, start):
visited, queue = set(), [start]
while queue:
vertex = queue.pop(0)
if vertex not in visited:
visited.add(vertex)
queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
return visited
def connected_components(G):
seen = set()
for v in G:
if v not in seen:
c = set(bfs(G, v))
yield c
seen.update(c)
def graph(edge_list):
result =
for source, target in edge_list:
result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
return result
def concat(l):
edges =
s = list(map(set, l))
for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
edges.append((i, j))
G = graph(edges)
result =
unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
for component in connected_components(G):
union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
result.append(sorted(union))
unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]
result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))
return result
print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))
Output
[[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
[[0, 1, 2]]
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
3
Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
â Kamloops
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:
import networkx as nx
l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
#l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
#l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
G = nx.Graph()
#Add nodes to Graph
G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))
#Create edges from list of nodes
q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]
for i in q:
#Add edges to Graph
G.add_edges_from(i)
#Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
[list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:
[[0, 1, 2]]
Likewise for line 3:
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
add a comment |Â
Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.
original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
mapping =
rev_mapping =
for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
sentinel = -1
for item in candidate:
if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
merge_pos = mapping[item]
#update previous list with all new candidates
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = merge_pos
rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
break
else:
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = i
rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)
result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
print(result)
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
add a comment |Â
You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:
def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
for i in d:
if i not in _master_seen:
yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
else:
for i in d:
if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])
def join_data(_data):
_final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]
c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
print(list(map(join_data, c)))
Output:
[
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
[[0, 1, 2]],
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
]
I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert theyield from
statement as shown here.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
@ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
Why the downvote?
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
if you want it in simple form here is solution :
def concate(l):
len_l = len(l)
i = 0
while i < (len_l - 1):
for j in range(i + 1, len_l):
# i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
# elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
# may change as we iterate
i_set = set(l[i])
j_set = set(l[j])
if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
# Remove these two from list
l.pop(j)
l.pop(i)
# Merge them and append to the orig. list
ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
l.append(ij_union)
# len(l) has changed
len_l -= 1
# adjust 'i' because elements shifted
i -= 1
# abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
break
i += 1
return l
1
This isn't what the OP wants.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
â prashant rana
2 days ago
He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
â prashant rana
2 days ago
@ScottBoston check this solution
â prashant rana
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
You can use a connectivity matrix:
import numpy
def Concatenate(L):
result =
Ls_length = len(L)
conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array
idx1 = 0
while idx1 < Ls_length:
idx2 = idx1 + 1
conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
while idx2 < Ls_length:
if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
idx2 += 1
idx1 += 1
print (conn_mat)
idx = 0
while idx < Ls_length:
if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
idx += 1
continue
connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
r = set()
for idx_ in connected:
r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
check_vector[idx_] = 1
result.append(list(r))
return result
def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
# the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
connected = [idx]
i = 0
idx_ = idx
while i < len(connected):
j = 0
while j < Ls_length:
if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
j += 1
i += 1
if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]
return list(set(connected))
Then you just:
L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
r = Concatenate(L)
print(r)
add a comment |Â
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:
from itertools import combinations
def bfs(graph, start):
visited, queue = set(), [start]
while queue:
vertex = queue.pop(0)
if vertex not in visited:
visited.add(vertex)
queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
return visited
def connected_components(G):
seen = set()
for v in G:
if v not in seen:
c = set(bfs(G, v))
yield c
seen.update(c)
def graph(edge_list):
result =
for source, target in edge_list:
result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
return result
def concat(l):
edges =
s = list(map(set, l))
for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
edges.append((i, j))
G = graph(edges)
result =
unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
for component in connected_components(G):
union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
result.append(sorted(union))
unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]
result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))
return result
print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))
Output
[[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
[[0, 1, 2]]
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
3
Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
â Kamloops
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:
from itertools import combinations
def bfs(graph, start):
visited, queue = set(), [start]
while queue:
vertex = queue.pop(0)
if vertex not in visited:
visited.add(vertex)
queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
return visited
def connected_components(G):
seen = set()
for v in G:
if v not in seen:
c = set(bfs(G, v))
yield c
seen.update(c)
def graph(edge_list):
result =
for source, target in edge_list:
result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
return result
def concat(l):
edges =
s = list(map(set, l))
for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
edges.append((i, j))
G = graph(edges)
result =
unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
for component in connected_components(G):
union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
result.append(sorted(union))
unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]
result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))
return result
print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))
Output
[[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
[[0, 1, 2]]
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
3
Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
â Kamloops
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:
from itertools import combinations
def bfs(graph, start):
visited, queue = set(), [start]
while queue:
vertex = queue.pop(0)
if vertex not in visited:
visited.add(vertex)
queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
return visited
def connected_components(G):
seen = set()
for v in G:
if v not in seen:
c = set(bfs(G, v))
yield c
seen.update(c)
def graph(edge_list):
result =
for source, target in edge_list:
result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
return result
def concat(l):
edges =
s = list(map(set, l))
for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
edges.append((i, j))
G = graph(edges)
result =
unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
for component in connected_components(G):
union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
result.append(sorted(union))
unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]
result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))
return result
print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))
Output
[[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
[[0, 1, 2]]
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:
from itertools import combinations
def bfs(graph, start):
visited, queue = set(), [start]
while queue:
vertex = queue.pop(0)
if vertex not in visited:
visited.add(vertex)
queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
return visited
def connected_components(G):
seen = set()
for v in G:
if v not in seen:
c = set(bfs(G, v))
yield c
seen.update(c)
def graph(edge_list):
result =
for source, target in edge_list:
result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
return result
def concat(l):
edges =
s = list(map(set, l))
for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
edges.append((i, j))
G = graph(edges)
result =
unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
for component in connected_components(G):
union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
result.append(sorted(union))
unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]
result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))
return result
print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))
Output
[[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
[[0, 1, 2]]
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
answered 2 days ago
Daniel Mesejo
12.9k11024
12.9k11024
3
Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
â Kamloops
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
3
Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
â Kamloops
2 days ago
3
3
Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
â Kamloops
2 days ago
Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
â Kamloops
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:
import networkx as nx
l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
#l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
#l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
G = nx.Graph()
#Add nodes to Graph
G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))
#Create edges from list of nodes
q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]
for i in q:
#Add edges to Graph
G.add_edges_from(i)
#Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
[list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:
[[0, 1, 2]]
Likewise for line 3:
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
add a comment |Â
You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:
import networkx as nx
l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
#l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
#l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
G = nx.Graph()
#Add nodes to Graph
G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))
#Create edges from list of nodes
q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]
for i in q:
#Add edges to Graph
G.add_edges_from(i)
#Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
[list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:
[[0, 1, 2]]
Likewise for line 3:
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
add a comment |Â
You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:
import networkx as nx
l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
#l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
#l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
G = nx.Graph()
#Add nodes to Graph
G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))
#Create edges from list of nodes
q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]
for i in q:
#Add edges to Graph
G.add_edges_from(i)
#Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
[list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:
[[0, 1, 2]]
Likewise for line 3:
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:
import networkx as nx
l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
#l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
#l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]
G = nx.Graph()
#Add nodes to Graph
G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))
#Create edges from list of nodes
q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]
for i in q:
#Add edges to Graph
G.add_edges_from(i)
#Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
[list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:
[[0, 1, 2]]
Likewise for line 3:
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
edited 22 hours ago
answered 2 days ago
Scott Boston
51.2k72955
51.2k72955
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.
original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
mapping =
rev_mapping =
for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
sentinel = -1
for item in candidate:
if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
merge_pos = mapping[item]
#update previous list with all new candidates
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = merge_pos
rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
break
else:
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = i
rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)
result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
print(result)
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
add a comment |Â
Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.
original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
mapping =
rev_mapping =
for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
sentinel = -1
for item in candidate:
if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
merge_pos = mapping[item]
#update previous list with all new candidates
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = merge_pos
rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
break
else:
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = i
rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)
result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
print(result)
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
add a comment |Â
Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.
original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
mapping =
rev_mapping =
for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
sentinel = -1
for item in candidate:
if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
merge_pos = mapping[item]
#update previous list with all new candidates
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = merge_pos
rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
break
else:
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = i
rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)
result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
print(result)
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.
original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
mapping =
rev_mapping =
for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
sentinel = -1
for item in candidate:
if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
merge_pos = mapping[item]
#update previous list with all new candidates
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = merge_pos
rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
break
else:
for item in candidate:
mapping[item] = i
rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)
result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
print(result)
Output:
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]
answered 2 days ago
Paritosh Singh
1,142113
1,142113
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:
def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
for i in d:
if i not in _master_seen:
yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
else:
for i in d:
if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])
def join_data(_data):
_final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]
c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
print(list(map(join_data, c)))
Output:
[
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
[[0, 1, 2]],
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
]
I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert theyield from
statement as shown here.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
@ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
Why the downvote?
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:
def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
for i in d:
if i not in _master_seen:
yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
else:
for i in d:
if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])
def join_data(_data):
_final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]
c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
print(list(map(join_data, c)))
Output:
[
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
[[0, 1, 2]],
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
]
I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert theyield from
statement as shown here.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
@ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
Why the downvote?
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:
def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
for i in d:
if i not in _master_seen:
yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
else:
for i in d:
if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])
def join_data(_data):
_final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]
c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
print(list(map(join_data, c)))
Output:
[
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
[[0, 1, 2]],
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
]
You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:
def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
for i in d:
if i not in _master_seen:
yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
else:
for i in d:
if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])
def join_data(_data):
_final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]
c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
print(list(map(join_data, c)))
Output:
[
[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
[[0, 1, 2]],
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]
]
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Ajax1234
40k42653
40k42653
I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert theyield from
statement as shown here.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
@ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
Why the downvote?
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert theyield from
statement as shown here.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
@ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
Why the downvote?
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert the
yield from
statement as shown here.â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert the
yield from
statement as shown here.â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
@ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
@ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago
Why the downvote?
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
Why the downvote?
â Ajax1234
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
if you want it in simple form here is solution :
def concate(l):
len_l = len(l)
i = 0
while i < (len_l - 1):
for j in range(i + 1, len_l):
# i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
# elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
# may change as we iterate
i_set = set(l[i])
j_set = set(l[j])
if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
# Remove these two from list
l.pop(j)
l.pop(i)
# Merge them and append to the orig. list
ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
l.append(ij_union)
# len(l) has changed
len_l -= 1
# adjust 'i' because elements shifted
i -= 1
# abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
break
i += 1
return l
1
This isn't what the OP wants.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
â prashant rana
2 days ago
He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
â prashant rana
2 days ago
@ScottBoston check this solution
â prashant rana
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
if you want it in simple form here is solution :
def concate(l):
len_l = len(l)
i = 0
while i < (len_l - 1):
for j in range(i + 1, len_l):
# i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
# elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
# may change as we iterate
i_set = set(l[i])
j_set = set(l[j])
if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
# Remove these two from list
l.pop(j)
l.pop(i)
# Merge them and append to the orig. list
ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
l.append(ij_union)
# len(l) has changed
len_l -= 1
# adjust 'i' because elements shifted
i -= 1
# abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
break
i += 1
return l
1
This isn't what the OP wants.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
â prashant rana
2 days ago
He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
â prashant rana
2 days ago
@ScottBoston check this solution
â prashant rana
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
if you want it in simple form here is solution :
def concate(l):
len_l = len(l)
i = 0
while i < (len_l - 1):
for j in range(i + 1, len_l):
# i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
# elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
# may change as we iterate
i_set = set(l[i])
j_set = set(l[j])
if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
# Remove these two from list
l.pop(j)
l.pop(i)
# Merge them and append to the orig. list
ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
l.append(ij_union)
# len(l) has changed
len_l -= 1
# adjust 'i' because elements shifted
i -= 1
# abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
break
i += 1
return l
if you want it in simple form here is solution :
def concate(l):
len_l = len(l)
i = 0
while i < (len_l - 1):
for j in range(i + 1, len_l):
# i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
# elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
# may change as we iterate
i_set = set(l[i])
j_set = set(l[j])
if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
# Remove these two from list
l.pop(j)
l.pop(i)
# Merge them and append to the orig. list
ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
l.append(ij_union)
# len(l) has changed
len_l -= 1
# adjust 'i' because elements shifted
i -= 1
# abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
break
i += 1
return l
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
prashant rana
520213
520213
1
This isn't what the OP wants.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
â prashant rana
2 days ago
He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
â prashant rana
2 days ago
@ScottBoston check this solution
â prashant rana
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
1
This isn't what the OP wants.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
â prashant rana
2 days ago
He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
â prashant rana
2 days ago
@ScottBoston check this solution
â prashant rana
2 days ago
1
1
This isn't what the OP wants.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
This isn't what the OP wants.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
â prashant rana
2 days ago
@ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
â prashant rana
2 days ago
He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
â Scott Boston
2 days ago
@ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
â prashant rana
2 days ago
@ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
â prashant rana
2 days ago
@ScottBoston check this solution
â prashant rana
2 days ago
@ScottBoston check this solution
â prashant rana
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
You can use a connectivity matrix:
import numpy
def Concatenate(L):
result =
Ls_length = len(L)
conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array
idx1 = 0
while idx1 < Ls_length:
idx2 = idx1 + 1
conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
while idx2 < Ls_length:
if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
idx2 += 1
idx1 += 1
print (conn_mat)
idx = 0
while idx < Ls_length:
if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
idx += 1
continue
connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
r = set()
for idx_ in connected:
r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
check_vector[idx_] = 1
result.append(list(r))
return result
def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
# the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
connected = [idx]
i = 0
idx_ = idx
while i < len(connected):
j = 0
while j < Ls_length:
if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
j += 1
i += 1
if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]
return list(set(connected))
Then you just:
L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
r = Concatenate(L)
print(r)
add a comment |Â
You can use a connectivity matrix:
import numpy
def Concatenate(L):
result =
Ls_length = len(L)
conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array
idx1 = 0
while idx1 < Ls_length:
idx2 = idx1 + 1
conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
while idx2 < Ls_length:
if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
idx2 += 1
idx1 += 1
print (conn_mat)
idx = 0
while idx < Ls_length:
if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
idx += 1
continue
connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
r = set()
for idx_ in connected:
r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
check_vector[idx_] = 1
result.append(list(r))
return result
def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
# the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
connected = [idx]
i = 0
idx_ = idx
while i < len(connected):
j = 0
while j < Ls_length:
if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
j += 1
i += 1
if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]
return list(set(connected))
Then you just:
L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
r = Concatenate(L)
print(r)
add a comment |Â
You can use a connectivity matrix:
import numpy
def Concatenate(L):
result =
Ls_length = len(L)
conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array
idx1 = 0
while idx1 < Ls_length:
idx2 = idx1 + 1
conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
while idx2 < Ls_length:
if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
idx2 += 1
idx1 += 1
print (conn_mat)
idx = 0
while idx < Ls_length:
if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
idx += 1
continue
connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
r = set()
for idx_ in connected:
r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
check_vector[idx_] = 1
result.append(list(r))
return result
def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
# the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
connected = [idx]
i = 0
idx_ = idx
while i < len(connected):
j = 0
while j < Ls_length:
if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
j += 1
i += 1
if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]
return list(set(connected))
Then you just:
L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
r = Concatenate(L)
print(r)
You can use a connectivity matrix:
import numpy
def Concatenate(L):
result =
Ls_length = len(L)
conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array
idx1 = 0
while idx1 < Ls_length:
idx2 = idx1 + 1
conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
while idx2 < Ls_length:
if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
idx2 += 1
idx1 += 1
print (conn_mat)
idx = 0
while idx < Ls_length:
if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
idx += 1
continue
connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
r = set()
for idx_ in connected:
r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
check_vector[idx_] = 1
result.append(list(r))
return result
def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
# the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
connected = [idx]
i = 0
idx_ = idx
while i < len(connected):
j = 0
while j < Ls_length:
if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
j += 1
i += 1
if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]
return list(set(connected))
Then you just:
L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
r = Concatenate(L)
print(r)
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
mm_
1341117
1341117
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
â Daniel Mesejo
2 days ago
@DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be
[[1,2,3,4]]
â Kamloops
2 days ago
I don't get your code. If
break_cond
is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?â dyukha
2 days ago
1
What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
â Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago