Large amount of lists concatenation [duplicate]










9















This question already has an answer here:



  • Merge lists that share common elements

    13 answers



I'm trying to make a function which concatenate multiple list if one element is the same in 2 or more different list.



Example :



[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]] would become [[1,2],[0,3,4,5]



[[1],[1,2],[0,2]] would become [[0,1,2]]



[[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]] would become [[1,2,3,4]]



In fact we just regroup the list if they have a common element and we delete one of the two element. The finals lists must have unique elements.



I tried to make the following function. It works, but when using big list (around 100 or 200 lists of list), I got the following recursion error :
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of an object



def concat(L):
break_cond = False
print(L)
for L1 in L:
for L2 in L:
if (bool(set(L1) & set(L2)) and L1 != L2):
break_cond = True
if (break_cond):
i, j = 0, 0
while i < len(L):
while j < len(L):
if (bool(set(L[i]) & set(L[j])) and i != j):
L[i] = sorted(L[i] + list(set(L[j]) - set(L[i])))
L.pop(j)
j += 1
i += 1
return concat(L)


Moreover, I would like to do it using only basic python and not that much library. Any idea ? Thanks



Example of list where I get the error :



[[0, 64], [1, 120, 172], [2, 130], [3, 81, 102], [5, 126], [6, 176], [7, 21, 94], [8, 111, 167], [9, 53, 60, 138], [10, 102, 179], [11, 45, 72], [12, 53, 129], [14, 35, 40, 58, 188], [15, 86], [18, 70, 94], [19, 28], [20, 152], [21, 24], [22, 143, 154], [23, 110, 171], [24, 102, 144], [25, 73, 106, 187], [26, 189], [28, 114, 137], [29, 148], [30, 39], [31, 159], [33, 44, 132, 139], [34, 81, 100, 136, 185], [35, 53], [37, 61, 138], [38, 144, 147, 165], [41, 42, 174], [42, 74, 107, 162], [43, 99, 123], [44, 71, 122, 126], [45, 74, 144], [47, 94, 151], [48, 114, 133], [49, 130, 144], [50, 51], [51, 187], [52, 124, 142, 146, 167, 184], [54, 97], [55, 94], [56, 88, 128, 166], [57, 63, 80], [59, 89], [60, 106, 134, 142], [61, 128, 145], [62, 70], [63, 73, 76, 101, 106], [64, 80, 176], [65, 187, 198], [66, 111, 131, 150], [67, 97, 128, 159], [68, 85, 128], [69, 85, 169], [70, 182], [71, 123], [72, 85, 94], [73, 112, 161], [74, 93, 124, 151, 191], [75, 163], [76, 99, 106, 129, 138, 152, 179], [77, 89, 92], [78, 146, 156], [79, 182], [82, 87, 130, 179], [83, 148], [84, 110, 146], [85, 98, 137, 177], [86, 198], [87, 101], [88, 134, 149], [89, 99, 107, 130, 193], [93, 147], [95, 193], [96, 98, 109], [104, 105], [106, 115, 154, 167, 190], [107, 185, 193], [111, 144, 153], [112, 128, 188], [114, 136], [115, 146], [118, 195], [119, 152], [121, 182], [124, 129, 177], [125, 156], [126, 194], [127, 198], [128, 149], [129, 153], [130, 164, 196], [132, 140], [133, 181], [135, 165, 170, 171], [136, 145], [141, 162], [142, 170, 187], [147, 171], [148, 173], [150, 180], [153, 191], [154, 196], [156, 165], [157, 177], [158, 159], [159, 172], [161, 166], [162, 192], [164, 184, 197], [172, 199], [186, 197], [187, 192]]









share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by River, tink, Matthieu Brucher, Makyen, eyllanesc python
Users with the  python badge can single-handedly close python questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
    – Daniel Mesejo
    2 days ago










  • @DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be [[1,2,3,4]]
    – Kamloops
    2 days ago











  • I don't get your code. If break_cond is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?
    – dyukha
    2 days ago






  • 1




    What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
    – Parag S. Chandakkar
    2 days ago















9















This question already has an answer here:



  • Merge lists that share common elements

    13 answers



I'm trying to make a function which concatenate multiple list if one element is the same in 2 or more different list.



Example :



[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]] would become [[1,2],[0,3,4,5]



[[1],[1,2],[0,2]] would become [[0,1,2]]



[[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]] would become [[1,2,3,4]]



In fact we just regroup the list if they have a common element and we delete one of the two element. The finals lists must have unique elements.



I tried to make the following function. It works, but when using big list (around 100 or 200 lists of list), I got the following recursion error :
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of an object



def concat(L):
break_cond = False
print(L)
for L1 in L:
for L2 in L:
if (bool(set(L1) & set(L2)) and L1 != L2):
break_cond = True
if (break_cond):
i, j = 0, 0
while i < len(L):
while j < len(L):
if (bool(set(L[i]) & set(L[j])) and i != j):
L[i] = sorted(L[i] + list(set(L[j]) - set(L[i])))
L.pop(j)
j += 1
i += 1
return concat(L)


Moreover, I would like to do it using only basic python and not that much library. Any idea ? Thanks



Example of list where I get the error :



[[0, 64], [1, 120, 172], [2, 130], [3, 81, 102], [5, 126], [6, 176], [7, 21, 94], [8, 111, 167], [9, 53, 60, 138], [10, 102, 179], [11, 45, 72], [12, 53, 129], [14, 35, 40, 58, 188], [15, 86], [18, 70, 94], [19, 28], [20, 152], [21, 24], [22, 143, 154], [23, 110, 171], [24, 102, 144], [25, 73, 106, 187], [26, 189], [28, 114, 137], [29, 148], [30, 39], [31, 159], [33, 44, 132, 139], [34, 81, 100, 136, 185], [35, 53], [37, 61, 138], [38, 144, 147, 165], [41, 42, 174], [42, 74, 107, 162], [43, 99, 123], [44, 71, 122, 126], [45, 74, 144], [47, 94, 151], [48, 114, 133], [49, 130, 144], [50, 51], [51, 187], [52, 124, 142, 146, 167, 184], [54, 97], [55, 94], [56, 88, 128, 166], [57, 63, 80], [59, 89], [60, 106, 134, 142], [61, 128, 145], [62, 70], [63, 73, 76, 101, 106], [64, 80, 176], [65, 187, 198], [66, 111, 131, 150], [67, 97, 128, 159], [68, 85, 128], [69, 85, 169], [70, 182], [71, 123], [72, 85, 94], [73, 112, 161], [74, 93, 124, 151, 191], [75, 163], [76, 99, 106, 129, 138, 152, 179], [77, 89, 92], [78, 146, 156], [79, 182], [82, 87, 130, 179], [83, 148], [84, 110, 146], [85, 98, 137, 177], [86, 198], [87, 101], [88, 134, 149], [89, 99, 107, 130, 193], [93, 147], [95, 193], [96, 98, 109], [104, 105], [106, 115, 154, 167, 190], [107, 185, 193], [111, 144, 153], [112, 128, 188], [114, 136], [115, 146], [118, 195], [119, 152], [121, 182], [124, 129, 177], [125, 156], [126, 194], [127, 198], [128, 149], [129, 153], [130, 164, 196], [132, 140], [133, 181], [135, 165, 170, 171], [136, 145], [141, 162], [142, 170, 187], [147, 171], [148, 173], [150, 180], [153, 191], [154, 196], [156, 165], [157, 177], [158, 159], [159, 172], [161, 166], [162, 192], [164, 184, 197], [172, 199], [186, 197], [187, 192]]









share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by River, tink, Matthieu Brucher, Makyen, eyllanesc python
Users with the  python badge can single-handedly close python questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
    – Daniel Mesejo
    2 days ago










  • @DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be [[1,2,3,4]]
    – Kamloops
    2 days ago











  • I don't get your code. If break_cond is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?
    – dyukha
    2 days ago






  • 1




    What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
    – Parag S. Chandakkar
    2 days ago













9












9








9


2






This question already has an answer here:



  • Merge lists that share common elements

    13 answers



I'm trying to make a function which concatenate multiple list if one element is the same in 2 or more different list.



Example :



[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]] would become [[1,2],[0,3,4,5]



[[1],[1,2],[0,2]] would become [[0,1,2]]



[[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]] would become [[1,2,3,4]]



In fact we just regroup the list if they have a common element and we delete one of the two element. The finals lists must have unique elements.



I tried to make the following function. It works, but when using big list (around 100 or 200 lists of list), I got the following recursion error :
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of an object



def concat(L):
break_cond = False
print(L)
for L1 in L:
for L2 in L:
if (bool(set(L1) & set(L2)) and L1 != L2):
break_cond = True
if (break_cond):
i, j = 0, 0
while i < len(L):
while j < len(L):
if (bool(set(L[i]) & set(L[j])) and i != j):
L[i] = sorted(L[i] + list(set(L[j]) - set(L[i])))
L.pop(j)
j += 1
i += 1
return concat(L)


Moreover, I would like to do it using only basic python and not that much library. Any idea ? Thanks



Example of list where I get the error :



[[0, 64], [1, 120, 172], [2, 130], [3, 81, 102], [5, 126], [6, 176], [7, 21, 94], [8, 111, 167], [9, 53, 60, 138], [10, 102, 179], [11, 45, 72], [12, 53, 129], [14, 35, 40, 58, 188], [15, 86], [18, 70, 94], [19, 28], [20, 152], [21, 24], [22, 143, 154], [23, 110, 171], [24, 102, 144], [25, 73, 106, 187], [26, 189], [28, 114, 137], [29, 148], [30, 39], [31, 159], [33, 44, 132, 139], [34, 81, 100, 136, 185], [35, 53], [37, 61, 138], [38, 144, 147, 165], [41, 42, 174], [42, 74, 107, 162], [43, 99, 123], [44, 71, 122, 126], [45, 74, 144], [47, 94, 151], [48, 114, 133], [49, 130, 144], [50, 51], [51, 187], [52, 124, 142, 146, 167, 184], [54, 97], [55, 94], [56, 88, 128, 166], [57, 63, 80], [59, 89], [60, 106, 134, 142], [61, 128, 145], [62, 70], [63, 73, 76, 101, 106], [64, 80, 176], [65, 187, 198], [66, 111, 131, 150], [67, 97, 128, 159], [68, 85, 128], [69, 85, 169], [70, 182], [71, 123], [72, 85, 94], [73, 112, 161], [74, 93, 124, 151, 191], [75, 163], [76, 99, 106, 129, 138, 152, 179], [77, 89, 92], [78, 146, 156], [79, 182], [82, 87, 130, 179], [83, 148], [84, 110, 146], [85, 98, 137, 177], [86, 198], [87, 101], [88, 134, 149], [89, 99, 107, 130, 193], [93, 147], [95, 193], [96, 98, 109], [104, 105], [106, 115, 154, 167, 190], [107, 185, 193], [111, 144, 153], [112, 128, 188], [114, 136], [115, 146], [118, 195], [119, 152], [121, 182], [124, 129, 177], [125, 156], [126, 194], [127, 198], [128, 149], [129, 153], [130, 164, 196], [132, 140], [133, 181], [135, 165, 170, 171], [136, 145], [141, 162], [142, 170, 187], [147, 171], [148, 173], [150, 180], [153, 191], [154, 196], [156, 165], [157, 177], [158, 159], [159, 172], [161, 166], [162, 192], [164, 184, 197], [172, 199], [186, 197], [187, 192]]









share|improve this question
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Merge lists that share common elements

    13 answers



I'm trying to make a function which concatenate multiple list if one element is the same in 2 or more different list.



Example :



[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]] would become [[1,2],[0,3,4,5]



[[1],[1,2],[0,2]] would become [[0,1,2]]



[[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]] would become [[1,2,3,4]]



In fact we just regroup the list if they have a common element and we delete one of the two element. The finals lists must have unique elements.



I tried to make the following function. It works, but when using big list (around 100 or 200 lists of list), I got the following recursion error :
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of an object



def concat(L):
break_cond = False
print(L)
for L1 in L:
for L2 in L:
if (bool(set(L1) & set(L2)) and L1 != L2):
break_cond = True
if (break_cond):
i, j = 0, 0
while i < len(L):
while j < len(L):
if (bool(set(L[i]) & set(L[j])) and i != j):
L[i] = sorted(L[i] + list(set(L[j]) - set(L[i])))
L.pop(j)
j += 1
i += 1
return concat(L)


Moreover, I would like to do it using only basic python and not that much library. Any idea ? Thanks



Example of list where I get the error :



[[0, 64], [1, 120, 172], [2, 130], [3, 81, 102], [5, 126], [6, 176], [7, 21, 94], [8, 111, 167], [9, 53, 60, 138], [10, 102, 179], [11, 45, 72], [12, 53, 129], [14, 35, 40, 58, 188], [15, 86], [18, 70, 94], [19, 28], [20, 152], [21, 24], [22, 143, 154], [23, 110, 171], [24, 102, 144], [25, 73, 106, 187], [26, 189], [28, 114, 137], [29, 148], [30, 39], [31, 159], [33, 44, 132, 139], [34, 81, 100, 136, 185], [35, 53], [37, 61, 138], [38, 144, 147, 165], [41, 42, 174], [42, 74, 107, 162], [43, 99, 123], [44, 71, 122, 126], [45, 74, 144], [47, 94, 151], [48, 114, 133], [49, 130, 144], [50, 51], [51, 187], [52, 124, 142, 146, 167, 184], [54, 97], [55, 94], [56, 88, 128, 166], [57, 63, 80], [59, 89], [60, 106, 134, 142], [61, 128, 145], [62, 70], [63, 73, 76, 101, 106], [64, 80, 176], [65, 187, 198], [66, 111, 131, 150], [67, 97, 128, 159], [68, 85, 128], [69, 85, 169], [70, 182], [71, 123], [72, 85, 94], [73, 112, 161], [74, 93, 124, 151, 191], [75, 163], [76, 99, 106, 129, 138, 152, 179], [77, 89, 92], [78, 146, 156], [79, 182], [82, 87, 130, 179], [83, 148], [84, 110, 146], [85, 98, 137, 177], [86, 198], [87, 101], [88, 134, 149], [89, 99, 107, 130, 193], [93, 147], [95, 193], [96, 98, 109], [104, 105], [106, 115, 154, 167, 190], [107, 185, 193], [111, 144, 153], [112, 128, 188], [114, 136], [115, 146], [118, 195], [119, 152], [121, 182], [124, 129, 177], [125, 156], [126, 194], [127, 198], [128, 149], [129, 153], [130, 164, 196], [132, 140], [133, 181], [135, 165, 170, 171], [136, 145], [141, 162], [142, 170, 187], [147, 171], [148, 173], [150, 180], [153, 191], [154, 196], [156, 165], [157, 177], [158, 159], [159, 172], [161, 166], [162, 192], [164, 184, 197], [172, 199], [186, 197], [187, 192]]




This question already has an answer here:



  • Merge lists that share common elements

    13 answers







python






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago

























asked 2 days ago









Kamloops

756




756




marked as duplicate by River, tink, Matthieu Brucher, Makyen, eyllanesc python
Users with the  python badge can single-handedly close python questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by River, tink, Matthieu Brucher, Makyen, eyllanesc python
Users with the  python badge can single-handedly close python questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
    – Daniel Mesejo
    2 days ago










  • @DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be [[1,2,3,4]]
    – Kamloops
    2 days ago











  • I don't get your code. If break_cond is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?
    – dyukha
    2 days ago






  • 1




    What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
    – Parag S. Chandakkar
    2 days ago
















  • What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
    – Daniel Mesejo
    2 days ago










  • @DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be [[1,2,3,4]]
    – Kamloops
    2 days ago











  • I don't get your code. If break_cond is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?
    – dyukha
    2 days ago






  • 1




    What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
    – Parag S. Chandakkar
    2 days ago















What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
– Daniel Mesejo
2 days ago




What is the expected output for [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]?
– Daniel Mesejo
2 days ago












@DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be [[1,2,3,4]]
– Kamloops
2 days ago





@DanielMesejo I added the answer in my question and added more explanation, it would be [[1,2,3,4]]
– Kamloops
2 days ago













I don't get your code. If break_cond is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?
– dyukha
2 days ago




I don't get your code. If break_cond is false, what do you return? Why do you need to use recursion instead of while loop?
– dyukha
2 days ago




1




1




What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
– Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago




What about the input [[0,1],[2,3],[1,2]]? Will the output be [[0,1],[1,2,3]] or [[0,1,2,3]]?
– Parag S. Chandakkar
2 days ago












6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















6














As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:



from itertools import combinations


def bfs(graph, start):
visited, queue = set(), [start]
while queue:
vertex = queue.pop(0)
if vertex not in visited:
visited.add(vertex)
queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
return visited


def connected_components(G):
seen = set()
for v in G:
if v not in seen:
c = set(bfs(G, v))
yield c
seen.update(c)


def graph(edge_list):
result =
for source, target in edge_list:
result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
return result


def concat(l):
edges =
s = list(map(set, l))
for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
edges.append((i, j))
G = graph(edges)

result =
unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
for component in connected_components(G):
union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
result.append(sorted(union))
unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]

result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))

return result


print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))


Output



[[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
[[0, 1, 2]]
[[1, 2, 3, 4]]





share|improve this answer
















  • 3




    Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
    – Kamloops
    2 days ago


















6














You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:



import networkx as nx

l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
#l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
#l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]

G = nx.Graph()

#Add nodes to Graph
G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))

#Create edges from list of nodes
q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]

for i in q:

#Add edges to Graph
G.add_edges_from(i)

#Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
[list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]


Output:



[[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]


Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:



[[0, 1, 2]]


Likewise for line 3:



[[1, 2, 3, 4]]





share|improve this answer






























    1














    Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.



    original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]

    mapping =
    rev_mapping =

    for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
    sentinel = -1
    for item in candidate:
    if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
    merge_pos = mapping[item]
    #update previous list with all new candidates
    for item in candidate:
    mapping[item] = merge_pos
    rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
    break
    else:
    for item in candidate:
    mapping[item] = i
    rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)

    result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
    print(result)


    Output:



    [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]





    share|improve this answer




























      0














      You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:



      def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
      if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
      yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
      for i in d:
      if i not in _master_seen:
      yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
      else:
      for i in d:
      if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
      yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])

      def join_data(_data):
      _final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
      return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]

      c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
      print(list(map(join_data, c)))


      Output:



      [
      [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
      [[0, 1, 2]],
      [[1, 2, 3, 4]]
      ]





      share|improve this answer






















      • I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert the yield from statement as shown here.
        – Parag S. Chandakkar
        2 days ago










      • @ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
        – Ajax1234
        2 days ago











      • Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
        – Parag S. Chandakkar
        2 days ago










      • Why the downvote?
        – Ajax1234
        2 days ago


















      0














      if you want it in simple form here is solution :



      def concate(l):
      len_l = len(l)
      i = 0
      while i < (len_l - 1):
      for j in range(i + 1, len_l):

      # i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
      # elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
      # may change as we iterate

      i_set = set(l[i])
      j_set = set(l[j])

      if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
      # Remove these two from list
      l.pop(j)
      l.pop(i)

      # Merge them and append to the orig. list
      ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
      l.append(ij_union)

      # len(l) has changed
      len_l -= 1

      # adjust 'i' because elements shifted
      i -= 1

      # abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
      break

      i += 1
      return l





      share|improve this answer


















      • 1




        This isn't what the OP wants.
        – Scott Boston
        2 days ago










      • @ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
        – prashant rana
        2 days ago










      • He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
        – Scott Boston
        2 days ago










      • @ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
        – prashant rana
        2 days ago










      • @ScottBoston check this solution
        – prashant rana
        2 days ago


















      0














      You can use a connectivity matrix:



      import numpy

      def Concatenate(L):
      result =
      Ls_length = len(L)
      conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
      check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array

      idx1 = 0
      while idx1 < Ls_length:
      idx2 = idx1 + 1
      conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
      while idx2 < Ls_length:
      if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
      conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
      conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
      idx2 += 1
      idx1 += 1
      print (conn_mat)

      idx = 0
      while idx < Ls_length:
      if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
      idx += 1
      continue

      connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
      r = set()
      for idx_ in connected:
      r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
      check_vector[idx_] = 1

      result.append(list(r))

      return result

      def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
      # the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
      connected = [idx]
      i = 0
      idx_ = idx
      while i < len(connected):
      j = 0
      while j < Ls_length:
      if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
      if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
      j += 1
      i += 1
      if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]

      return list(set(connected))


      Then you just:



      L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
      r = Concatenate(L)
      print(r)





      share|improve this answer





























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        6














        As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:



        from itertools import combinations


        def bfs(graph, start):
        visited, queue = set(), [start]
        while queue:
        vertex = queue.pop(0)
        if vertex not in visited:
        visited.add(vertex)
        queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
        return visited


        def connected_components(G):
        seen = set()
        for v in G:
        if v not in seen:
        c = set(bfs(G, v))
        yield c
        seen.update(c)


        def graph(edge_list):
        result =
        for source, target in edge_list:
        result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
        result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
        return result


        def concat(l):
        edges =
        s = list(map(set, l))
        for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
        if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
        edges.append((i, j))
        G = graph(edges)

        result =
        unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
        for component in connected_components(G):
        union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
        result.append(sorted(union))
        unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]

        result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))

        return result


        print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
        print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
        print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))


        Output



        [[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
        [[0, 1, 2]]
        [[1, 2, 3, 4]]





        share|improve this answer
















        • 3




          Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
          – Kamloops
          2 days ago















        6














        As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:



        from itertools import combinations


        def bfs(graph, start):
        visited, queue = set(), [start]
        while queue:
        vertex = queue.pop(0)
        if vertex not in visited:
        visited.add(vertex)
        queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
        return visited


        def connected_components(G):
        seen = set()
        for v in G:
        if v not in seen:
        c = set(bfs(G, v))
        yield c
        seen.update(c)


        def graph(edge_list):
        result =
        for source, target in edge_list:
        result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
        result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
        return result


        def concat(l):
        edges =
        s = list(map(set, l))
        for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
        if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
        edges.append((i, j))
        G = graph(edges)

        result =
        unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
        for component in connected_components(G):
        union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
        result.append(sorted(union))
        unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]

        result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))

        return result


        print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
        print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
        print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))


        Output



        [[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
        [[0, 1, 2]]
        [[1, 2, 3, 4]]





        share|improve this answer
















        • 3




          Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
          – Kamloops
          2 days ago













        6












        6








        6






        As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:



        from itertools import combinations


        def bfs(graph, start):
        visited, queue = set(), [start]
        while queue:
        vertex = queue.pop(0)
        if vertex not in visited:
        visited.add(vertex)
        queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
        return visited


        def connected_components(G):
        seen = set()
        for v in G:
        if v not in seen:
        c = set(bfs(G, v))
        yield c
        seen.update(c)


        def graph(edge_list):
        result =
        for source, target in edge_list:
        result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
        result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
        return result


        def concat(l):
        edges =
        s = list(map(set, l))
        for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
        if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
        edges.append((i, j))
        G = graph(edges)

        result =
        unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
        for component in connected_components(G):
        union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
        result.append(sorted(union))
        unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]

        result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))

        return result


        print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
        print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
        print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))


        Output



        [[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
        [[0, 1, 2]]
        [[1, 2, 3, 4]]





        share|improve this answer












        As mentioned by @ScottBoston this is a graph problem, known as connected components, I suggest you used networkx as indicated by @ScottBoston, in case you cannot here is a version without networkx:



        from itertools import combinations


        def bfs(graph, start):
        visited, queue = set(), [start]
        while queue:
        vertex = queue.pop(0)
        if vertex not in visited:
        visited.add(vertex)
        queue.extend(graph[vertex] - visited)
        return visited


        def connected_components(G):
        seen = set()
        for v in G:
        if v not in seen:
        c = set(bfs(G, v))
        yield c
        seen.update(c)


        def graph(edge_list):
        result =
        for source, target in edge_list:
        result.setdefault(source, set()).add(target)
        result.setdefault(target, set()).add(source)
        return result


        def concat(l):
        edges =
        s = list(map(set, l))
        for i, j in combinations(range(len(s)), r=2):
        if s[i].intersection(s[j]):
        edges.append((i, j))
        G = graph(edges)

        result =
        unassigned = list(range(len(s)))
        for component in connected_components(G):
        union = set().union(*(s[i] for i in component))
        result.append(sorted(union))
        unassigned = [i for i in unassigned if i not in component]

        result.extend(map(sorted, (s[i] for i in unassigned)))

        return result


        print(concat([[1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [0, 4]]))
        print(concat([[1], [1, 2], [0, 2]]))
        print(concat([[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]))


        Output



        [[0, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2]]
        [[0, 1, 2]]
        [[1, 2, 3, 4]]






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Daniel Mesejo

        12.9k11024




        12.9k11024







        • 3




          Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
          – Kamloops
          2 days ago












        • 3




          Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
          – Kamloops
          2 days ago







        3




        3




        Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
        – Kamloops
        2 days ago




        Thanks a lot ! I already knew about networkx, actually the problem I want to solve is a graph problem and that's why I needed a concat function. But I needed to do it from scratch, thanks again !
        – Kamloops
        2 days ago













        6














        You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:



        import networkx as nx

        l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
        #l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
        #l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]

        G = nx.Graph()

        #Add nodes to Graph
        G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))

        #Create edges from list of nodes
        q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]

        for i in q:

        #Add edges to Graph
        G.add_edges_from(i)

        #Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
        [list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]


        Output:



        [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]


        Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:



        [[0, 1, 2]]


        Likewise for line 3:



        [[1, 2, 3, 4]]





        share|improve this answer



























          6














          You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:



          import networkx as nx

          l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
          #l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
          #l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]

          G = nx.Graph()

          #Add nodes to Graph
          G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))

          #Create edges from list of nodes
          q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]

          for i in q:

          #Add edges to Graph
          G.add_edges_from(i)

          #Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
          [list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]


          Output:



          [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]


          Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:



          [[0, 1, 2]]


          Likewise for line 3:



          [[1, 2, 3, 4]]





          share|improve this answer

























            6












            6








            6






            You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:



            import networkx as nx

            l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
            #l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
            #l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]

            G = nx.Graph()

            #Add nodes to Graph
            G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))

            #Create edges from list of nodes
            q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]

            for i in q:

            #Add edges to Graph
            G.add_edges_from(i)

            #Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
            [list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]


            Output:



            [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]


            Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:



            [[0, 1, 2]]


            Likewise for line 3:



            [[1, 2, 3, 4]]





            share|improve this answer














            You can use networkx library because is a graph theory and connected components problem:



            import networkx as nx

            l = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
            #l = [[1],[1,2],[0,2]]
            #l = [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]

            G = nx.Graph()

            #Add nodes to Graph
            G.add_nodes_from(sum(l, ))

            #Create edges from list of nodes
            q = [[(s[i],s[i+1]) for i in range(len(s)-1)] for s in l]

            for i in q:

            #Add edges to Graph
            G.add_edges_from(i)

            #Find all connnected components in graph and list nodes for each component
            [list(i) for i in nx.connected_components(G)]


            Output:



            [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]


            Output if uncomment line 2 and comment line 1:



            [[0, 1, 2]]


            Likewise for line 3:



            [[1, 2, 3, 4]]






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 22 hours ago

























            answered 2 days ago









            Scott Boston

            51.2k72955




            51.2k72955





















                1














                Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.



                original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]

                mapping =
                rev_mapping =

                for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
                sentinel = -1
                for item in candidate:
                if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
                merge_pos = mapping[item]
                #update previous list with all new candidates
                for item in candidate:
                mapping[item] = merge_pos
                rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
                break
                else:
                for item in candidate:
                mapping[item] = i
                rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)

                result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
                print(result)


                Output:



                [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]





                share|improve this answer

























                  1














                  Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.



                  original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]

                  mapping =
                  rev_mapping =

                  for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
                  sentinel = -1
                  for item in candidate:
                  if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
                  merge_pos = mapping[item]
                  #update previous list with all new candidates
                  for item in candidate:
                  mapping[item] = merge_pos
                  rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
                  break
                  else:
                  for item in candidate:
                  mapping[item] = i
                  rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)

                  result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
                  print(result)


                  Output:



                  [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]





                  share|improve this answer























                    1












                    1








                    1






                    Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.



                    original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]

                    mapping =
                    rev_mapping =

                    for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
                    sentinel = -1
                    for item in candidate:
                    if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
                    merge_pos = mapping[item]
                    #update previous list with all new candidates
                    for item in candidate:
                    mapping[item] = merge_pos
                    rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
                    break
                    else:
                    for item in candidate:
                    mapping[item] = i
                    rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)

                    result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
                    print(result)


                    Output:



                    [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]





                    share|improve this answer












                    Here's an iterative approach, should be about as efficient as you can probably get in pure python. One thing is having to spend an extra pass removing duplicates at the end.



                    original_list = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]

                    mapping =
                    rev_mapping =

                    for i, candidate in enumerate(original_list):
                    sentinel = -1
                    for item in candidate:
                    if mapping.get(item, -1) != -1:
                    merge_pos = mapping[item]
                    #update previous list with all new candidates
                    for item in candidate:
                    mapping[item] = merge_pos
                    rev_mapping[merge_pos].extend(candidate)
                    break
                    else:
                    for item in candidate:
                    mapping[item] = i
                    rev_mapping.setdefault(i, ).extend(candidate)

                    result = [list(set(item)) for item in rev_mapping.values()]
                    print(result)


                    Output:



                    [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]]






                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 days ago









                    Paritosh Singh

                    1,142113




                    1,142113





















                        0














                        You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:



                        def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
                        if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
                        yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
                        for i in d:
                        if i not in _master_seen:
                        yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
                        else:
                        for i in d:
                        if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
                        yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])

                        def join_data(_data):
                        _final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
                        return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]

                        c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
                        print(list(map(join_data, c)))


                        Output:



                        [
                        [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
                        [[0, 1, 2]],
                        [[1, 2, 3, 4]]
                        ]





                        share|improve this answer






















                        • I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert the yield from statement as shown here.
                          – Parag S. Chandakkar
                          2 days ago










                        • @ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
                          – Ajax1234
                          2 days ago











                        • Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
                          – Parag S. Chandakkar
                          2 days ago










                        • Why the downvote?
                          – Ajax1234
                          2 days ago















                        0














                        You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:



                        def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
                        if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
                        yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
                        for i in d:
                        if i not in _master_seen:
                        yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
                        else:
                        for i in d:
                        if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
                        yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])

                        def join_data(_data):
                        _final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
                        return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]

                        c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
                        print(list(map(join_data, c)))


                        Output:



                        [
                        [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
                        [[0, 1, 2]],
                        [[1, 2, 3, 4]]
                        ]





                        share|improve this answer






















                        • I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert the yield from statement as shown here.
                          – Parag S. Chandakkar
                          2 days ago










                        • @ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
                          – Ajax1234
                          2 days ago











                        • Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
                          – Parag S. Chandakkar
                          2 days ago










                        • Why the downvote?
                          – Ajax1234
                          2 days ago













                        0












                        0








                        0






                        You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:



                        def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
                        if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
                        yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
                        for i in d:
                        if i not in _master_seen:
                        yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
                        else:
                        for i in d:
                        if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
                        yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])

                        def join_data(_data):
                        _final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
                        return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]

                        c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
                        print(list(map(join_data, c)))


                        Output:



                        [
                        [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
                        [[0, 1, 2]],
                        [[1, 2, 3, 4]]
                        ]





                        share|improve this answer














                        You can use a recursive version of the breadth-first search with no imports:



                        def group_vals(d, current, _groups, _seen, _master_seen):
                        if not any(set(current)&set(i) for i in d if i not in _seen):
                        yield list(i for b in _groups for i in b)
                        for i in d:
                        if i not in _master_seen:
                        yield from group_vals(d, i, [i], [i], _master_seen+[i])
                        else:
                        for i in d:
                        if i not in _seen and set(current)&set(i):
                        yield from group_vals(d, i, _groups+[i], _seen+[i], _master_seen+[i])

                        def join_data(_data):
                        _final_result = list(group_vals(_data, _data[0], [_data[0]], [_data[0]], ))
                        return [a for i, a in enumerate(_final_result) if a not in _final_result[:i]]

                        c = [[[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]], [[1],[1,2],[0,2]], [[1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]]]
                        print(list(map(join_data, c)))


                        Output:



                        [
                        [[1, 2], [0, 3, 4, 5]],
                        [[0, 1, 2]],
                        [[1, 2, 3, 4]]
                        ]






                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited 2 days ago

























                        answered 2 days ago









                        Ajax1234

                        40k42653




                        40k42653











                        • I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert the yield from statement as shown here.
                          – Parag S. Chandakkar
                          2 days ago










                        • @ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
                          – Ajax1234
                          2 days ago











                        • Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
                          – Parag S. Chandakkar
                          2 days ago










                        • Why the downvote?
                          – Ajax1234
                          2 days ago
















                        • I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert the yield from statement as shown here.
                          – Parag S. Chandakkar
                          2 days ago










                        • @ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
                          – Ajax1234
                          2 days ago











                        • Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
                          – Parag S. Chandakkar
                          2 days ago










                        • Why the downvote?
                          – Ajax1234
                          2 days ago















                        I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert the yield from statement as shown here.
                        – Parag S. Chandakkar
                        2 days ago




                        I can't get your code to work on the bigger test case that the OP has posted. Also for other readers who are running this code in Python 2.7, you have to convert the yield from statement as shown here.
                        – Parag S. Chandakkar
                        2 days ago












                        @ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
                        – Ajax1234
                        2 days ago





                        @ParagS.Chandakkar the recursion introduces a slight delay for longer input lists. Your answer fails on the last list the OP posted BTW.
                        – Ajax1234
                        2 days ago













                        Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
                        – Parag S. Chandakkar
                        2 days ago




                        Yes, I know, even my answer fails for the longer test case. I was just wondering where the flaw is in my approach. I looked at your approach and it also faces the same issue.
                        – Parag S. Chandakkar
                        2 days ago












                        Why the downvote?
                        – Ajax1234
                        2 days ago




                        Why the downvote?
                        – Ajax1234
                        2 days ago











                        0














                        if you want it in simple form here is solution :



                        def concate(l):
                        len_l = len(l)
                        i = 0
                        while i < (len_l - 1):
                        for j in range(i + 1, len_l):

                        # i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
                        # elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
                        # may change as we iterate

                        i_set = set(l[i])
                        j_set = set(l[j])

                        if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
                        # Remove these two from list
                        l.pop(j)
                        l.pop(i)

                        # Merge them and append to the orig. list
                        ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
                        l.append(ij_union)

                        # len(l) has changed
                        len_l -= 1

                        # adjust 'i' because elements shifted
                        i -= 1

                        # abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
                        break

                        i += 1
                        return l





                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 1




                          This isn't what the OP wants.
                          – Scott Boston
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago










                        • He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
                          – Scott Boston
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston check this solution
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago















                        0














                        if you want it in simple form here is solution :



                        def concate(l):
                        len_l = len(l)
                        i = 0
                        while i < (len_l - 1):
                        for j in range(i + 1, len_l):

                        # i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
                        # elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
                        # may change as we iterate

                        i_set = set(l[i])
                        j_set = set(l[j])

                        if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
                        # Remove these two from list
                        l.pop(j)
                        l.pop(i)

                        # Merge them and append to the orig. list
                        ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
                        l.append(ij_union)

                        # len(l) has changed
                        len_l -= 1

                        # adjust 'i' because elements shifted
                        i -= 1

                        # abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
                        break

                        i += 1
                        return l





                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 1




                          This isn't what the OP wants.
                          – Scott Boston
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago










                        • He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
                          – Scott Boston
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston check this solution
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago













                        0












                        0








                        0






                        if you want it in simple form here is solution :



                        def concate(l):
                        len_l = len(l)
                        i = 0
                        while i < (len_l - 1):
                        for j in range(i + 1, len_l):

                        # i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
                        # elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
                        # may change as we iterate

                        i_set = set(l[i])
                        j_set = set(l[j])

                        if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
                        # Remove these two from list
                        l.pop(j)
                        l.pop(i)

                        # Merge them and append to the orig. list
                        ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
                        l.append(ij_union)

                        # len(l) has changed
                        len_l -= 1

                        # adjust 'i' because elements shifted
                        i -= 1

                        # abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
                        break

                        i += 1
                        return l





                        share|improve this answer














                        if you want it in simple form here is solution :



                        def concate(l):
                        len_l = len(l)
                        i = 0
                        while i < (len_l - 1):
                        for j in range(i + 1, len_l):

                        # i,j iterate over all pairs of l's elements including new
                        # elements from merged pairs. We use len_l because len(l)
                        # may change as we iterate

                        i_set = set(l[i])
                        j_set = set(l[j])

                        if len(i_set.intersection(j_set)) > 0:
                        # Remove these two from list
                        l.pop(j)
                        l.pop(i)

                        # Merge them and append to the orig. list
                        ij_union = list(i_set.union(j_set))
                        l.append(ij_union)

                        # len(l) has changed
                        len_l -= 1

                        # adjust 'i' because elements shifted
                        i -= 1

                        # abort inner loop, continue with next l[i]
                        break

                        i += 1
                        return l






                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited 2 days ago

























                        answered 2 days ago









                        prashant rana

                        520213




                        520213







                        • 1




                          This isn't what the OP wants.
                          – Scott Boston
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago










                        • He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
                          – Scott Boston
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston check this solution
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago












                        • 1




                          This isn't what the OP wants.
                          – Scott Boston
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago










                        • He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
                          – Scott Boston
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago










                        • @ScottBoston check this solution
                          – prashant rana
                          2 days ago







                        1




                        1




                        This isn't what the OP wants.
                        – Scott Boston
                        2 days ago




                        This isn't what the OP wants.
                        – Scott Boston
                        2 days ago












                        @ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
                        – prashant rana
                        2 days ago




                        @ScottBoston i have saw his example he given , what he want . . still confuse how example 1 and 3 are different
                        – prashant rana
                        2 days ago












                        He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
                        – Scott Boston
                        2 days ago




                        He is looking to combine lists of connected part.
                        – Scott Boston
                        2 days ago












                        @ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
                        – prashant rana
                        2 days ago




                        @ScottBoston ok i got it, unable to saw that he want common element in between
                        – prashant rana
                        2 days ago












                        @ScottBoston check this solution
                        – prashant rana
                        2 days ago




                        @ScottBoston check this solution
                        – prashant rana
                        2 days ago











                        0














                        You can use a connectivity matrix:



                        import numpy

                        def Concatenate(L):
                        result =
                        Ls_length = len(L)
                        conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
                        check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array

                        idx1 = 0
                        while idx1 < Ls_length:
                        idx2 = idx1 + 1
                        conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
                        while idx2 < Ls_length:
                        if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
                        conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
                        conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
                        idx2 += 1
                        idx1 += 1
                        print (conn_mat)

                        idx = 0
                        while idx < Ls_length:
                        if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
                        idx += 1
                        continue

                        connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
                        r = set()
                        for idx_ in connected:
                        r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
                        check_vector[idx_] = 1

                        result.append(list(r))

                        return result

                        def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
                        # the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
                        connected = [idx]
                        i = 0
                        idx_ = idx
                        while i < len(connected):
                        j = 0
                        while j < Ls_length:
                        if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
                        if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
                        j += 1
                        i += 1
                        if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]

                        return list(set(connected))


                        Then you just:



                        L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
                        r = Concatenate(L)
                        print(r)





                        share|improve this answer



























                          0














                          You can use a connectivity matrix:



                          import numpy

                          def Concatenate(L):
                          result =
                          Ls_length = len(L)
                          conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
                          check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array

                          idx1 = 0
                          while idx1 < Ls_length:
                          idx2 = idx1 + 1
                          conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
                          while idx2 < Ls_length:
                          if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
                          conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
                          conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
                          idx2 += 1
                          idx1 += 1
                          print (conn_mat)

                          idx = 0
                          while idx < Ls_length:
                          if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
                          idx += 1
                          continue

                          connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
                          r = set()
                          for idx_ in connected:
                          r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
                          check_vector[idx_] = 1

                          result.append(list(r))

                          return result

                          def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
                          # the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
                          connected = [idx]
                          i = 0
                          idx_ = idx
                          while i < len(connected):
                          j = 0
                          while j < Ls_length:
                          if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
                          if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
                          j += 1
                          i += 1
                          if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]

                          return list(set(connected))


                          Then you just:



                          L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
                          r = Concatenate(L)
                          print(r)





                          share|improve this answer

























                            0












                            0








                            0






                            You can use a connectivity matrix:



                            import numpy

                            def Concatenate(L):
                            result =
                            Ls_length = len(L)
                            conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
                            check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array

                            idx1 = 0
                            while idx1 < Ls_length:
                            idx2 = idx1 + 1
                            conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
                            while idx2 < Ls_length:
                            if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
                            conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
                            conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
                            idx2 += 1
                            idx1 += 1
                            print (conn_mat)

                            idx = 0
                            while idx < Ls_length:
                            if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
                            idx += 1
                            continue

                            connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
                            r = set()
                            for idx_ in connected:
                            r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
                            check_vector[idx_] = 1

                            result.append(list(r))

                            return result

                            def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
                            # the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
                            connected = [idx]
                            i = 0
                            idx_ = idx
                            while i < len(connected):
                            j = 0
                            while j < Ls_length:
                            if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
                            if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
                            j += 1
                            i += 1
                            if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]

                            return list(set(connected))


                            Then you just:



                            L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
                            r = Concatenate(L)
                            print(r)





                            share|improve this answer














                            You can use a connectivity matrix:



                            import numpy

                            def Concatenate(L):
                            result =
                            Ls_length = len(L)
                            conn_mat = numpy.zeros( [Ls_length, Ls_length] ) # you can use a list of lists instead of a numpy array
                            check_vector = numpy.zeros( Ls_length ) # you can use a list instead of a numpy array

                            idx1 = 0
                            while idx1 < Ls_length:
                            idx2 = idx1 + 1
                            conn_mat[idx1,idx1] = 1 # the diaginal is always 1 since every set intersects itself.
                            while idx2 < Ls_length:
                            if bool(set(L[idx1]) & set(L[idx2]) ): # 1 if the sets idx1 idx2 intersect, and 0 if they don't.
                            conn_mat[idx1,idx2] = 1 # this is clearly a symetric matrix.
                            conn_mat[idx2,idx1] = 1
                            idx2 += 1
                            idx1 += 1
                            print (conn_mat)

                            idx = 0
                            while idx < Ls_length:
                            if check_vector[idx] == 1: # check if we already concatenate the idx element of L.
                            idx += 1
                            continue

                            connected = GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length)
                            r = set()
                            for idx_ in connected:
                            r = r.union(set(L[idx_]))
                            check_vector[idx_] = 1

                            result.append(list(r))

                            return result

                            def GetAllPositiveIntersections(idx, conn_mat, Ls_length):
                            # the elements that intersect idx are coded with 1s in the ids' row (or column, since it's a symetric matrix) of conn_mat.
                            connected = [idx]
                            i = 0
                            idx_ = idx
                            while i < len(connected):
                            j = 0
                            while j < Ls_length:
                            if bool(conn_mat[idx_][j]):
                            if j not in connected: connected.append(j)
                            j += 1
                            i += 1
                            if i < len(connected): idx_ = connected[i]

                            return list(set(connected))


                            Then you just:



                            L = [[1,2],[3,4,5],[0,4]]
                            r = Concatenate(L)
                            print(r)






                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited yesterday

























                            answered 2 days ago









                            mm_

                            1341117




                            1341117













                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Top Tejano songwriter Luis Silva dead of heart attack at 64

                                ReactJS Fetched API data displays live - need Data displayed static

                                Evgeni Malkin