WikiProject Women writers	(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)	Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.  Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Books	(Rated C-class)	BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.  C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.

The information included is certainly relevant, however, it is not detailed enough to give the reader a good understanding of what the book is about or its origins. The details need to be elaborated on and information could be structured in a more clear way. The language can also be changed. There are spots where most of the information included is in the form of quotes that are not explained or explored. This also presents a more narrow interpretation of the work as a whole, after establishing that Woolfe attempted to cover a variety of topics. These topics should also be elaborated on in their own sections or paragraphs.

The article is neutral.

The reception section focuses heavily on the response of one person. This response is relevant, as it is the response of someone credited with helping inspire the text, but other responses are not considered in any kind of detail or nuance.

More sources could definitely help elaborate on the reception of the book and I do not think the letter that inspired the text itself is referenced, which it should be. The sources that are used seem to be well cited and trustworthy.

This is a C-Class article in the interest group of women writers. There did not seem to be much activity on the talk page at all despite its Mid-importance rating. Kcowherd (talk) 17:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)